this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
452 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

60366 readers
4456 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

Yeah it is similar, but not the same (at least not yet).

China is a one-party state, and the government has control over private enterprise. If you are a Chinese company, the PRC ultimately has control of it, and that means the Chinese military has access to anything you have access to, if they want it.

This is on a different level than anything Snowden released.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

This is on a different level than anything Snowden released.

Snowden released the fact that the major internet companies in the US literally have full time CIA staff and locked rooms with servers

Why is this on a different level? Is it because they're ASIANS?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That Snowden releasing the facts and it being brought up in courts, state congress, and federal congress as well as national news all revolved around it being illegal in the USA.

In the PRC it's only illegal to talk about it.

[–] bilb@lem.monster 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That Snowden releasing the facts and it being brought up in courts, state congress, and federal congress as well as national news all revolved around it being illegal in the USA.

Did it stop?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The specific program Snowden revealed supposedly ended in 2015, it collected information such as who was calling who and for how long. The 9th Circuit actually ruled it clearly illegal in 2020 and Snowden made a Tweet about it in a relatively good mood.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

This is the best news I've heard all day! Thanks.

[–] CharmOffensive@lemm.ee 5 points 7 hours ago

The long and short of it is even leftie Americans have internalised American exceptionalism, even if they aren't cognisant of it. And the right are, well... Racist and don't want to admit it.

[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

One government is actively committing genocide against subsets of their population I’d say it’s a pretty big fucking difference.

[–] holo@lemmy.wtf -3 points 6 hours ago

Yeah the US genocide of black Americans needs the earn them some serious sanctions, but it's not relevant to this discussion.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world -2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Uht oh. Brace yourself for leftists. Prepare to be deemed genocide supporter nazi extraordinaire.

[–] holo@lemmy.wtf -5 points 6 hours ago

There are several hundred political parties in China currently in office.

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

China is a one-party state

I wish you could realise how hilarious it is to read someone comparing the US and China on their number of political parties...

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Oh? So you are saying that there are no functional difference between a federation of 50 states, each with individual (somewhat independent) local and state governments, and the authoritarian CCP?

When I say "China is a one-party state," I'm not referring to political parties as we would understand them in the US (Democrat/Republican). I am referring to the actual structure of the government.

You might want to maybe educate yourself on what a "one-party state" means in this context before trying to make snarky comments.

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

You're right, I'm sorry, I really should educate myself about the US beyond the 40+ years of propaganda I've had to endure and the absolutely constant, never ending stream of shit across all media I'm the grateful recipient of, thanks to the Internet™. But honestly, I'm kinda scared I'd actually die if I came to visit.

Meanwhile, my experience with China over the last ten years or so has left me regularly wondering, in the grand scheme of things, what the fucking difference is. You both are absolutely insane, from where I live.

But yes, I was totally cherry picking your message. I don't disagree with you, to be clear. I'm just amused about your choice of epithet.

[–] lukewarm_ozone@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

What's so hilarious about it?

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 hours ago

I'm being slightly disingenuous by focusing on one expression in the entire message, granted.
But honestly, using "one party state" as an epiteth, like that's what you want to focus on that's badwrong about China? that's amusing to me, reading this from Europe. YMMV.