357

Japan decides to strip Unification Church's religious corporation status (japantoday.com)

submitted 1 year ago by alphacyberranger@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 72 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Easily the most effective assassin in recent history. He had a goal, his plan was to kill former PM, and his goal was... achieved?

Kudos.

Also, Shinzo-Abe was a genocide apologist from a family of war criminals. So, I sincerely mean kudos.

His grandfather was a Class A war criminal.

His dad trained as a kamikaze pilot, but the war ended before he got to compete a mission. Real shame.

Edit: here's some extra bonus points:

He didn't kill anyone else

Unification Church (Moonies) are a really disgusting and terrible organization.

Shinzo-Abe was a real piece of shit. Please lookup just his education "reforms", and that's just the fraction of his bad acts.

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 year ago

Recent history? I've never even heard of anything like this in all of human history.

Assassin kills a prominent leader. Public opinion for leader falls and people tend to side with the assassin. Government makes reforms to achieve assassin's goals. Name one other case like that.

Maybe the French Revolution, but that was a large group of people, not one assassin completely changing public opinion for an entire movement.

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

I meant the impact, or effect, not the intent.

Because as far as impact, Archduke Ferdinand, might want a word.

But yes, I agree with everything you said, with just with one big caveat: I'm not a historian.

[-] inconel@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

If there's something to mourn, I'd say the lost oppurtunity to have him procetuted (there was a trial about financial fraud at that time).

[-] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Incredible that the Japanese government effectively sided with a presidential assassin’s cause.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

it helps the public response was akin to "well that makes sense"

[-] Maeve@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Two things can be true at once.

[-] AstroTechie@lemdro.id 37 points 1 year ago

Well, the guy is in jail for what he did, and as bad as his action was the government can't just ignore the issues he uncovered.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

Dude is one of the most successful assassins of all time, not only did he eliminate his target the response was exactly what he hoped to achieve

[-] grte@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2023/10/shinzo-abe-assassination-japan-unification-church-moonies/675114/

I wonder how the assassin is feeling about things right now? Wild story.

[-] x4740N@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theatlantic.com%2Fmagazine%2Farchive%2F2023%2F10%2Fshinzo-abe-assassination-japan-unification-church-moonies%2F675114%2F

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

The link to the article is no longer valid.

[-] TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

Works for me?

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023

357 points (99.7% liked)

World News

38969 readers

2564 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.