240

(Channeling my inner Nelson)- HaHa!!!

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 129 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He should try declaring the vote illegitimate and inciting a mob to take over the House—that’s a good trick!

[-] Ersatz86@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Jokes! We got ‘em!

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Nah, he needs to let some of his Republican colleagues get sexually abused and not say anything about it.

[-] Ersatz86@lemmy.world 76 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And a special cheers to Reuters photog Jonathan Ernst who captured all of the frustration, regret, and failure of the moment in one sour expression: a sweet, sweet nectar!

Pulitzer material right there.

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Should use that as the next cover of Man of the year.

[-] Ersatz86@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Agreed. Suitable for framing.

I barely recognized him with his mouth closed and his jacket on.

More deliciousness here

[-] evatronic@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

He's great at keeping his mouth closed when there's talk of sexually abuse of students.

[-] Ersatz86@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago

Jordan, a man who has not been able to get anything through Congress in three decades. Yeah, that’s a guy you want in charge of a legislative body.

[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Keep in mind that representatives are really still playing high school gossip games as their day-to-day life, and I'm imagining a dialog like:

MAGAists: you'll never elect a speaker without us. That makes it our party and we're the boss.
OldGOP: Everyone else wants to make Steve Scalise the speaker, and you can have these fancy titles if you go along.
MAGAists: Nah, we tried that with whats-his-name. We're the boss now.
OldGOP: *eyeroll* Fine, put up your guy and see what happens.
*Jim Jordan loses*
*surprised pikachu*

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

To be fair, a lot boring old Republicans voted for this guy for the same reason they supported Trump. They’re afraid of being called out by the base and or being primaried for not being right wing enough.

The only people who are standing up are the people in districts that are still purple. And there are fewer and fewer of those because of gerrymandering.

[-] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 8 points 1 year ago

Fox News was actually threatening to sic the base on people who voted against Jordan, according to something I heard on the local community radio earlier. They sent stuff saying like, “Is it true that Representative X is against confirming Jordan? When are you going to let the peoples house open, the people want to know.” To someone at the house. There was another sentence basically threatening to turn their base loose on individual reps if they didn’t flip flop and support Jordan. I’ll have to see if I can dig up an article.

[-] Emma_Gold_Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Just try it another 14 times! Worked last time.

[-] Ersatz86@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

If my tumescence lasts for more than fourteen votes should I call a doctor?

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

By the way, just WHERE is that documentary on him? When is that going to come out?

[-] RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

He's going to go back to his old tried and true methods and help Gaetz avoid repercussions for sex trafficking a minor.

[-] quinkin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Dude looks like a super villain.

[-] Ersatz86@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Meh- I’d say mediocre villain with delusions of grandeur at best. Really just one of a bunch of shitty off-brand Hall-of-Fascists barely-adequate-and-overcompensating villains.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

He's a villain alright. Just not a super one. What's the difference? PRESENTATION!

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

He's not smart enough to be a super villain.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Diet villain.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago

I think they should give Dolly Parton a call. Bet her whip count is better.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Dolly is too busy actually helping Americans to be wasting time on this clown show

[-] autotldr 6 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The loss means that for now the House remains leaderless, as it has been since a handful of Republican hardliners engineered Kevin McCarthy's ouster as speaker two weeks ago.

Many of them are moderates who represent politically competitive districts, while others specialize in negotiating the complex spending bills that keep the U.S. government running, deals that typically require a willingness to compromise.

Four Republicans from the New York City area said they voted against Jordan because he opposed benefits for survivors of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, as well as tax policies and disaster aid that would help their residents.

"He is a patriot, an America First warrior who wins the toughest of fights," Republican Representative Elise Stefanik said as she nominated Jordan for speaker on the House floor.

Democratic Representative Pete Aguilar said on the House floor that Jordan's election would show the U.S.' enemies that "the very people who seek to undermine democracy are rewarded with positions of immense power.

A fixture on conservative media outlets, Jordan has used his perch as chair of the House Judiciary Committee to help lead an impeachment inquiry into Biden that Democrats decry as baseless.


The original article contains 781 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Ersatz86@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago
[-] Uninformed_Tyler@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Do we do that here? Honest question from a transplant.

[-] Ersatz86@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Call me a traditionalist.

Plus an easy way to give ups to the devs.

[-] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Also a transplant. This bot is on virtually every post. No need to give it unneeded praise.

[-] Ersatz86@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Suppose you should refrain then

[-] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Agreed and I do.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
240 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3230 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS