118
Newt Gingrich can suck a fat chode because he was one of the originators of the “I will have a tantrum until you give me what I want” tactics that the GOP has used for at least 30 years now
He's to blame for the entire thing, lmao. Fuck this fat, adulterous, peice of shit. This is the inevitable outcome of the extreme partisanship he started in the 90s
Massive shitbag complains about other massive shitbags
Why do these societal vampires hang on so long?
This chode was the guy who normalized shutting down the government. He is a Christian Nationalist who raged about how milquetoast Democrats were fascists.
His cholesterol should do the world a favor.
Fuck this guy and every waste-of-carbon republican over the last 50 years. Except maybe chuck hagel and a few like him. Fuck the republican traitor filth.
They did exactly what Putin is paying them to do - sabotage the US Government.
Stop it. He's not paying them a dime, er ruble. He doesn't need to. He's extorting them with all the juicy dirt the dumb fucks had in their emails when the RNC servers got hacked in 2016.
Tbf there can be a carrot AND a stick. We know Russia gave money to the NRA, who in turn donates heavily to republicans. Those juicy campaign donations from the NRA/the threat of them drying up if you go against what Putin wants are also likely levers being used.
The same NRA proven to be funded by overseas (Russian) interests, which acts like a lobby laundering program?
Dude. Stop. Putin isn't literally paying them.
Which btw, makes them seem smarter then they really are.
Their actions are motivated and influenced based on a mix of stupidity, social media, echo chambers, contarianism, and another dose of stupidity.
AKA "useful idiots"
Sure, but that's significantly different then being an actual foreign agent, as evidenced by Sen. Mendez's indictments.
Being a useful idiot isn't a crime by itself, but being an elected official and a foreign agent is.
Newt, you set a great example you worthless fuck.
Shut the fuck up Gingrich nobody cares about your fuckhead opinions.
I didn't know he was still alive. I wonder how old he is.
Welcome to the party you helped create, Newt.
Unleash the furries!
Wait, no they like leashes don’t they…
Leash the furries!
Newt, you practically started this shit. Eat my ass.
Well well, if it isn't the consequences of my actions.
Newt, probably not.
Pot. Kettle. Black.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
“Well right now, [the House] can’t govern, and I think that the eight people who betrayed the conference and joined the Democrats to defeat the 96 percent of the conference unleashed furies that I don’t think they’d even dreamed of, because it gave every person the right to be equally destructive and equally angry,” Gingrich, also a Fox News contributor, told “Fox News Sunday” anchor Shannon Bream.
The former Republican Speaker noted there is a “very real danger” the House could elect someone and in a few weeks, “you’re going to have a group of people blow up and decide to go back into the same mess.”
Republicans now are looking to ensure this can’t happen again, though a resolution of this nature would likely not be possible to vote on until the House elects a new Speaker and returns to its normal functions.
In the days that followed, several Republicans looking to take the Speaker’s gavel were met with internal conflict within the GOP conference preventing some candidates from garnering the 217 votes necessary for the Speakership.
initially clinched the GOP’s support and beat Jordan, but he dropped out a day later when it became apparent he would not reach the 217 votes.
Jordan failed to reach 217 votes on three ballots last week, actually losing more GOP support with each round.
The original article contains 627 words, the summary contains 223 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
118 points (94.7% liked)
politics
19107 readers
3039 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS