this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
884 points (98.8% liked)

memes

13373 readers
2829 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 130 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The 2024 animated movie Flow was done entirely in Blender. It is an incredible movie, highly recommend.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Blender was also used a bit in Everything Everywhere All At Once

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago

And Into the Spiderverse for some stuff

[–] OR3X@lemm.ee 72 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Running FOSS on closed source systems. Classic.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 71 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It'a a start! Makes the switch much easier.

[–] herrvogel@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No. You either go full Stallman and inject Gentoo directly into your aorta, or you might as well be deep throating Satya Nutella while bouncing on Tim Apple's lap. Filthy casual.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Noob, I snort pure Colombian and run LFS directly in my brain using the power of cryptic dreams and messages handed down to me directly by Lord RMS

[–] null@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So you're saying your prefrontal cortex doesn't even have a Holy C✝ compiler? Terry looks down on you in shame.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Agreed, OSS purity is silly. I am running an open source client (Thunder) to this open source service on my Pixel 9 running GraphineOS, the low level firmware is still absolutely proprietary.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Actually, to be clear, I don't think FOSS purity is bad. I just mean that denigrating what others are doing because they're using something non-free while they're making steps in the right direction is dumb and counterproductive.

To my mind, FOSS is the only way forward for a healthy, functioning society, and the fact that so much of our digital landscape is being gradually replaced with it is to me evidence of that. I think the end goal should always be pure FOSS, but that doesn't (necessarily) mean immediately jumping to all FOSS; it just means taking steps to cut out proprietary software wherever you reasonably can.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Running Linux on closed source hardware. Classic.

I bet you aren't even using your own open RISC-V based SBC, with fully open-source peripherals. Is your computer monitor even running an open-source firmware or are you just a FOSS poser?

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Using computers with closed source biology. Classic.

I bet you haven't even engineered your own DNA-II, fully-sequenced, libre-licensed microbiome with open source biochemical pathways. Are your eyes even running an open-source neural firmware, or are you just a FOSS poser?

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Using biology on closed source chemistry. Classic. I bet you didn't even roll your own proton mass or bother configuring your own valence shells. Are you even running your own coulomb law policies, or are you just a FOSS poser?

[–] rosco385@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago

I don't have a witty reply, but these kinds of threads were the best part of reddit. So glad to have shitposters like you all here on Lemmy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Hot take: I hate when software just extracts an executable.
Fucking install it so that it's registered with the software updater and uninstaller. Don't make me remember that I have to go hunting in the folder to delete this one app.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Some people prefer it.

I maintain a small piece of Windows software and originally just provided an installer, but I received enough requests for it that now when I publish releases I provide both an installer and a zipped portable build.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kopasz7@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Having no package manager be like:

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)
  1. You don't need an uninstaller if deleting the folder suffices
  2. You don't want some software to update.
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Assuming you are on Windows, the proper install method is to run

winget install -e --id BlenderFoundation.Blender

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Kind of a moot point since most windows programs don't have a centralized hub for updates either, even when "properly installed" in program files.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tfowinder@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Oh it's free so it lacks features

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Exactly! And every proprietary software is by definition perfect cause it is subject to the forces of the open market. Subway eat fresh and freeze, scumbag!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you don't count professional software, nowadays it's actually the opposite. Very often in proprietary software there are features removed with no alternative provided by developers, or there's one but actually it has nothing to do with what you actually want.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Shipairtime@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

I just got blender after having last looked at it ten years ago. It looks so much better! I had an easy time finding stuff. If you tried it in the past and are afraid of how ugly it was it is worth another shot. Also look up the doughnut tutorial.

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd like to make it like that for my projects, but I don't use windows so I can't do well with packaging them. And sometimes when I try it runs in the computer, but then doesn't run in other computers because of missing dlls or some other things.

Anyone have good idea how to make it easy. Using windows VM is such a hassle to install and such just for tiny programs I make.

[–] hangonasecond@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Make them in a portable language. Something like Java for example. Or you can write in rust and compile for each target.

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It's in rust. Problem is the gtk part, it has to be installed in the system, which makes it run there. But how do I distribute the program without having everyone install gtk on their computer. In Linux it's just a dependency so it's not a problem, for windows I can't seem to make it work.

Edit: also, I need gtk because people around me who uses windows aren't going to use CLI program at all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SleepyPie@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Me running Godot on a new computer yesterday

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Bravo. Truly an exceptional meme.

load more comments
view more: next ›