530
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 268 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

At least 22 dead and 60 wounded.

To all of you out there who want no gun control. This blood is on your hands. Screw you and your 2nd amendment "rights."

Edit: 18 dead, 13 wounded

[-] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 142 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Still waiting for the good guy with a gun they keep repeating

EDIT: OK everyone, yes he was the good guy with a gun. Thanks to everyone for pointing this out

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 116 points 1 year ago

Apparently, the shooter was a firearms instructor. Aka, good guy with a gun turned bad guy with a gun.

This crap will never end until the tools they use to kill are off the streets.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 74 points 1 year ago

Apparently, the shooter was a firearms instructor.

Every gun owner thinks they're a responsible gun owner.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] variaatio@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Which is the key problem. Everyone is a "responsible gun owner" and "good guy with a gun"...... until sometimes they suddenly aren't anymore. At which point your protection is what was person able to keep under normal circumstances aka what they had in their possession on the moment they had a mental snap.

Was it a semi-auto shoot as fast as your finger pulls rifle with potentially hundreds of rounds in quick swap magazines or do they have a manual action hunting rifle or shotgun with fixed magazine, that need to be manually reloaded.

Do they have a pistol with again potentially hundreds of rounds of quick reload ammunition or don't or maybe a target pistol with fixed magazine.

That is why places around the world have magazine and type restrictions, since they exactly know "checking backgrounds isn't fool proof and now amount of background checking helps again sudden newly emerging situation after the checks have been done".

Sure that 5 round moose hunting rifle will absolutely wreck say those 5 people, but one can't exactly run amock shooting around endlessly with moose rifle. Damage limitation. 5 dead people is better situation, than 22 dead people. As cold calculating as that is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

cough cough Uvalde cough

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

didn't come because his mother aborted him /s

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Yesterday the right said this WAS a good guy. Just let that sink in.

[-] UnspecificGravity 14 points 1 year ago

This guy is exactly the kind of person that the GOP considers a "good guy with a gun". He is a mentally ill veteran firearms instructor. Sounds like a boilerplate Trump supporter. Exactly who they want to have more guns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Army vet and gun instructor... This was the good guy

load more comments (46 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Predicting a failure in background checks here allowing him to get a gun:

Edit

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/family-maine-shooting-suspect-says-mental-health-deteriorated-rapidly-rcna122353

"The weapon believed to have been used in the attack was a sniper rifle with .308 caliber bullets, and it was purchased legally this year, officials said."

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/lewiston-maine-shooting-robert-card-what-know-rcna122262

"Maine court records show that a man named Robert Card who was born on the same date as the person of interest was charged with speeding in 2001 and 2002. No other criminal records were listed in the state's electronic court records system or in several other public records databases."

But also:

"It added that law enforcement said Card 'recently reported mental health issues to include hearing voices and threats to shoot up the National Guard Base in Saco, ME.'

The bulletin said Card was reported to have been committed to a mental health facility for two weeks this summer and then released. NBC News has not been able to independently verify the bulletin's statements about Card's history."

In previous incidents, people committed to mental health facilities didn't have it turn up on their background check unless it was ordered by a judge. That needs to change.

I'm seeing varying reports that he was also convicted of domestic abuse, but this link shows no such charges.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Anyone hearing voices needs to have their guns immediately seized.

[-] TeraFloppy 30 points 1 year ago

That would violate the 1st amendment right to religion.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] UnspecificGravity 16 points 1 year ago

Not very many people have argued that people who have actually made violent threats and been institutionalized should be buying guns.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

The 5th Circuit Court (with at least one judge appointed by Trump) has ruled that removing the guns from a violent domestic abuser violates his rights: https://www.texastribune.org/2023/02/09/guns-domestic-abuse-second-amendment/

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

This guy was a firearms instructor. Literally a good guy with a gun turned into a bad guy with a gun.

[-] UnspecificGravity 26 points 1 year ago

The key point is that he was also recently institutionalized after making threats and SHOULD have had his guns seized, even under existing law.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (154 replies)
[-] Custoslibera@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago

Get rid of guns and you can stop this.

It’s the most basic solution that even conservatives can understand.

They seem to apply the following logic to everything else:

Stop immigrants? Build wall

Stop terrorists? Kill them

Stop homeless? Bus them

Stop poor? Tax cut

Stop mass shootings? Ban guns

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Ok wait a minute. The conservatives are wrong on all 4 of those. So are you saying that logic would be wrong for banning guns also? Not sure which argument you are making here.

[-] Custoslibera@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

What I’m saying is that if you applied their logic it should hold true that they’d just ban guns.

But they don’t, which is weird.

[-] Ado@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

they don't like immigrants, the homeless, poor, etc. They do like guns.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 61 points 1 year ago

Take a bow conservatives. The blood is on your hands.

[-] Princeali311@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

They're cool with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yoz@aussie.zone 61 points 1 year ago
[-] JoeyBalls@lemmynsfw.com 17 points 1 year ago

Definitely not for Maine though. This guy was a military weapons instructor for the army. My cousin was at West Point with him this summer and he is the one who got him a psych eval. One day on the shooting range I guess he had a psychotic breakdown talking about the voices in his head and wanting to shoot up places. The shooter was absolutely pissed about having to get a psych eval. The shooter is still at large and it's terrifying especially because he might be going after my cousin.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 41 points 1 year ago

Does anyone here believe this? Like anyone at all?

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Well, my cousin's brother's sister's step-mom told me...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

I love how ppl who know nothing about guns are talking about how "it can't be full auto because $$$$"

Shut the fuck up u fools ..

U can buy a $20 auto sear online that makes any ar full auto. Yes its illegal. No one cares.

[-] superguy@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

I don't see people saying that.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] iBaz@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] theodewere@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago

this happened at a crowded bowling alley

Lewiston, about 35 miles north of Portland, emerged as a major center for African immigration into Maine. The Somali population, which numbers in the thousands, has changed the demographics of the once overwhelmingly white mill city into one of the most diverse in northern New England.

any indication that the crowd was any particular complexion?

[-] Prettywhooped@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

I haven’t read anything about it, so I can’t say for sure, but I work in the Lewiston area and I’ve heard both the bowling alley and bar to be more “local” oriented businesses.

The Walmart distribution center is a weird one though, because it’s not really a store front.

Whatever his motivations are, it breaks my heart to see it happen in our neck of the woods.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

The maine news was reporting that he had recently sought mental health support for schizophrenia and hearing voices.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cbarrick@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

The shooter is still at large.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
530 points (96.8% liked)

News

23259 readers
3367 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS