this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
135 points (97.2% liked)

Buy European

3949 readers
2106 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

!buycanadian@lemmy.ca

!buyafrican@baraza.africa

!buyFromEU@lemm.ee

!buyfromeu@feddit.org

Buying and Selling:!flohmarkt@lemmy.ca

Boycott:!boycottus@lemmy.ca

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:!stopkillinggames@lemm.ee


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

https://veklar.com/

First time I see this, not sure what they mean

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 85 points 4 days ago (1 children)

For their use case it makes sense.

They want heightened privacy features like making likes and follows private, which is something that is incompatible with the current state of activitypub.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You're telling me I brought this pitchfork all the way over here for nothing ?

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 24 points 4 days ago

You can go turn that garden bed over if ya want.

[–] sinceasdf@lemmy.world 38 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

People probably should be more aware that what happens on here is mostly public and also why that's a better alternative to only giving data to private networks run by companies with trade secrets.

Giving data out to everyone prevents an outsized amount of leverage being given to single companies. Facebook doesn't have anywhere near as much kingmaking power if the same methods can be used by competitors or exposed and mitigated for outright.

Being open source, you also can know exactly what the fediverse is collecting and it's currently a fuck load less than the massive data stream companies like Facebook record.

[–] Isa@feddit.org 32 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, we are an evil and creepy lot, aren't we?Morticia and Gomez Addams, sitting on a sofa. Gomez appearing to be in mid sentence.

[–] Venicon@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This will always be Morticia and Gomez Addams in my head.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] Venicon@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

There's been multiple actors in the parts over the years but these two were perfect I think.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

For those of us that grew up with the TV show, no. John Astin literally named the character he played. Before the television show the characters didn't all have names.

The movies are fine, and there's nothing wrong if you enjoy them. But for myself John Astin and Carolyn Jones are the iconic couple. But then I was born over a decade before the movies. But just two years after the television shows 1975 Halloween special. So it may be a generational thing.

[–] EuropeanMade@feddit.uk 27 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I don't really feel I need protecting from the Fediverse, more from the "regular" social networks

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 13 points 4 days ago

Right!?! I'm ok with anarchy, and a non-commercial, non-corporate social media. Not in any need of being protected, whatsoever.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

To play devils advocate though, any "regular social media company" can tap into the fediverse and harvest all of the data and do whatever fucked up things they want to it. The fediverse doesn't protect you from them, it just puts you outside their algorithm control. Though even that is debatable because it is possible that a lot of posters on Lemmy may have first seen the content from algorithm-driven sources.

[–] EuropeanMade@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You're right, but I feel "regular social media companies" can do this on their own networks too, but pretend they don't.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 2 points 3 days ago

Oh for sure! It is a lose-lose for the general population no matter what way you look at it.

[–] fdrc_ff@www.foxyhole.io 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

@Blaze@feddit.nl they even made a cute little graphic including some niche softwares, so cute

[–] Blaze@feddit.nl 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Definitely the biggest threats around

[–] fdrc_ff@www.foxyhole.io 23 points 4 days ago (2 children)

@Blaze@feddit.nl oh I see
Basically they see the Fediverse as a data breach with no actual control over what happen to data the moment it gets to other servers (actually true) and especially if GAFAM gets involved. I mean, I get this they want to stay super-private. But I think that private social networks is a bit naive as an idea

[–] Charlxmagne@lemm.ee 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

If google actually integrates yt to the fediverse it might genuinely be the best thing they ever did, I genuinely hope they do cuz it's the one centralised social media I actively use and the only google service I use in general.

Plus it goes without saying it objectively has the largest amount of high quality content regularly posted by thousands of people.

It could be the thing that would let a lot of users fully degoogle/decouple from google's monopoly and bring a LOT more eyes onto the fediverse as a whole.

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

But why would Google do that?

[–] Blaze@feddit.nl 11 points 4 days ago

I kind of see where they come from too, but the way they present it just seems strange

[–] tiempo@friendica.world -3 points 4 days ago

@Blaze aaaaaaaaaah..... La frase es como el forro, pero es una incompatibilidad de principios que se traduce en aspectos técnicos (y una critica fuerte al hecho que Meta y google buscan federar)

[–] tiempo@friendica.world -4 points 4 days ago

@Blaze aaaaaaaaaah..... La frase es como el forro, pero es una incompatibilidad de principios que se traduce en aspectos técnicos (y una critica fuerte al hecho que Meta y google buscan federar)

[–] tiempo@friendica.world -4 points 4 days ago
[–] tiempo@friendica.world -4 points 4 days ago