this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
400 points (93.7% liked)

politics

22011 readers
4148 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If anyone wants some good rage material, watch the Pod Save America interview with Harris staffers

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (19 children)

She was elected, not appointed. She could say and do what she wanted and theres not much Biden could have done about it.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] AidsKitty@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

She is her own person and has to live with the consequences of her choices like everybody else. It's all in the past now and just a footnote in history.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 194 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Let's blame Joe so Kamala can run again.

Not fooling me, DNC. I smell what you're cooking.

[–] robbinhood@lemmy.world 75 points 2 days ago (25 children)

I want to tell myself that there's no way in hell they would let this happen, let alone make it happen.

Then I remember it's the DNC.

[–] thepresentpast@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

I don't think this is even close to possible. She has removed herself from public view for a reason. On a personal level, she's done. If she had any intentions to run for any kind of office, she would have emerged by now as an opposition leader.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s not like they colluded to kneecap Bernie’s campaign. Wait…

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Honestly this behavior is going to keep getting highlighted from Biden because he was an absolute stubborn idiot. He had polling showing him losing to Trump with over 400 electoral votes for MONTHS before dropping out. He blamed his family for staying in as long as he did, obviously it was him or what was left of him.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 2 days ago (6 children)

History will not look kindly on Biden for fucking over his one job of stopping Trump. Didn't arrest him, didn't defeat him, didn't stop most of the Jan 6 protestors, didn't go after the enablers of his actions, didn't really stop anything Trump did to avoid debt and jail and we ended up with him for Round 2, Even Worse This Time.

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago

Look at democrats now. Still doing absolutely nothing. Even if they won they still wouldn’t have stopped Trump or Musk. They’d probably just stand aside if there was another Jan 6.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

more like the megadonors were starting to steer away from biden and harris.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Hillary was going to continue Obamas policies, more or less. its purely sexism why both female candidates never won, sprinkled a little racism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] robbinhood@lemmy.world 126 points 2 days ago (4 children)

To be honest, this is just a signal that she probably wouldn't have been a good leader. Better than Trump, sure, but that bar is so low it's a tripping hazard.

She should have told Biden to pound sand after locking up the nomination.

But we should verify the claim before passing judgement.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 42 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Honestly, her campaign already signaled that. This, if true, just reinforces it. It also reinforces that Biden was a bad leader, which he was.

Obligatory: I voted for Harris and Biden and dems down ticket every election since I've been old enough to vote.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Obligatory: I voted for Harris and Biden and dems down ticket every election since I’ve been old enough to vote.

Man I am getting sick of needing to say this ahead of time/to anyone who goes "well if you criticized our candidates of their serious and actual issues, you must be a Republican!"

[–] Jhuskindle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's refreshingly less common here than reddit. I am so happy to find comrades in "i voted for dems but it was under duress" here.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 76 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It's ridiculous to think that Harris couldn't have done what she wanted. Once you're named the nominee, that's it. They're not going to back out.

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago (7 children)

If she was unwilling to break from him because of his wishes, even if she was theoretically able, that speaks volumes about her as a leader.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 54 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Sounds like an excuse. She could've had a different stance but didn't. Because she's the same thing. She was asked point blank how she's any different than Biden and she couldn't answer.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago

Sounds like she’s a bitch. You’re campaign already started who gives a fuck what Joe Biden wants. Imo it’s good she didn’t win because if she could be that easily controlled then it’s better she stay on the sidelines.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (10 children)

I am wondering if the mods of news@lemmy.world and politics@lemmy.world regret censoring the people who rightfully said these things and it would cost us the election. Like there's mods in here who go "yeah that sucks, I knew it." but also just defended Biden/Harris and removed good faith users who posted citations that even their beloved Media Bias Bot said was a good source.

They did it, banned the people who said it, and then people went "where are all those critics now? i guess putin turned them off! hurr hurr haw haw!"

Genuinely wonder if they question their choices of just doing this for free with literally zero benefit to their website and the country as a whole.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Lunar_Voyager@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The way democrats talk: "We're turning the page and letting the daylight in!"

The way democrats act with a majority: "We couldn't get any daylight this time, but we did pass these bipartisan flashlights which are known to explode occasionally due to republicans demanding amendments be added to the batteries."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

WDYM "let"? What was he gonna do? Sniff her?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (3 children)

His legacy is in the toilet so congratulations advisors.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›