this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
204 points (99.5% liked)

News

27476 readers
4644 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A US federal judge has questioned why the Trump administration failed to obey his order halting the deportations of alleged Venezuelan gang members.
White House officials argued in a court filing that they did not defy the ruling. The argued in part that because Boasberg's order was made orally rather than in written form, it was not enforceable - and that the planes had already left the US by the time it was issued.

During a hearing on Monday, Boasberg said he clearly ordered the government to turn the planes around. "You're saying that you felt you could disregard it because it wasn't in a written order?" he asked Department of Justice lawyers.

After lawyers told the judge that planes with deportees already had taken off, he reportedly gave a verbal order for the flights to turn back "immediately", although that directive was not included in a written ruling published shortly thereafter. Nonetheless, a timeline of events reported by US media suggests the Trump administration had the opportunity to stop at least some of the deportations.

Under the US system of checks and balances, government agencies are expected to comply with a federal judge's ruling.

El Salvador has agreed to accept the deportees from the US. The country's president, Nayib Bukele, appeared to mock the judge's ruling. "Oopsie… Too late," he posted on social media, along with a picture of a headline announcing the ruling and a 'crying with laughter' emoji. His team also published footage of some of the detainees inside one of its mega-jails.
According to the White House, El Salvador's government received $6m (£4.62m) to take the detainees, which Leavitt said "is pennies on the dollar" compared to the cost of holding inmates in US prisons.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which brought the lawsuit leading to the judge's order, questioned Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act, a sweeping wartime authority that allows fast-track deportations. "I think we're in very dangerous territory here in the United States with the invocation of this law," said the ACLU's Lee Gelernt.
The Alien Enemies Act only allowed deportations when the US was in a declared war with that foreign government, or was being invaded, Mr Gelernt said. "A gang is not invading," he told BBC News. Making matters worse was the fact "the administration is saying nobody can review what they're doing", Mr Gelernt added.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Stop questioning. Start arresting.

[–] NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago

Who exactly would do the arresting? Do you see all those pigs in the photos? This whole thing is like a cops wet dream.

Remember that there is no order too vile or reprehensible for the police to follow and every nasty law throughout history was ultimately enforced by the police.

[–] circuitloss@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

Questioned it? I think it's pretty clear that fascists don't care about the law

[–] danny801@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Under the US system of checks and balances, government agencies are expected to comply with a federal judge's ruling.

Or what, "or else?" Or else, what?

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

According to the White House, El Salvador’s government received $6m (£4.62m) to take the detainees

Ahhh, that's the part I was missing. I thought the Central American govts caved awfully fast after initially protesting the deportations. This is going to get ugly, if they're basically being turned into a revenue-stream. El Salv will need to ensure they make a profit of some sort on that 6m.

[–] MacAttak8@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s 6 million to keep them there for one year. That’s what was agreed upon, so it likely won’t be the last payment they receive for these deportees.

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I see, thank you for the detail.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

The argued in part that because Boasberg's order was made orally rather than in written form

Some god dammed sov cit shit.

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago

If laws and the constitution are not or can not be enforced, they are mere "optional guidelines" for these people to ignore. Either you take action against blatantly illegal actions, or you might just as well welcome your next dictator with some presents, right now already actually, because it won't get any better when they already start ignoring laws/constitution right now. It's a pure downward spiral from there, and it sends a clear signal to the administration and all of its allies that laws are optional right now. Also, regular people would already be fined/jailed/shot for doing 0.000001% of the wrongdoings of this administration. If there is such a thing like an actual justice system and a system of checks and balances in the US, then wake it the fuck up or it dies in its sleep. Much sooner than later.