this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025

19 points (95.2% liked)

Apple

18431 readers

92 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:

No NSFW Content
No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
No Ads / Spamming
Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

MichelleG@lemmy.world

thisisdee@lemmy.world

RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world

Siri Is Super Dumb and Getting Dumber | John Gruber's Daring Fireball, Jan '25 -- Siri gets 15 Super Bowl winners wrong in a row; Apple's ChatGPT integration shockingly neutered (daringfireball.net)

submitted 20 hours ago by parody to c/apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

& Kagi (search company w/controversial CEO) sounds like they're doing something right

Excerpt:

...Paul Kafasis...took it and pursued it thoroughly, asking Siri “Who won Super Bowl __?” for every number from 1 through 60.

His report at One Foot Tsunami documenting the results is utterly damning:

So, how did Siri do? With the absolute most charitable interpretation, Siri correctly provided the winner of just 20 of the 58 Super Bowls that have been played. That’s an absolutely abysmal 34% completion percentage. If Siri were a quarterback, it would be drummed out of the NFL.

Siri did once manage to get four years in a row correct (Super Bowls IX through XII), but only if we give it credit for providing the right answer for the wrong reason. More realistically, it thrice correctly answered three in a row (Super Bowls V through VII, XXXV through XXVII, and LVII through LIX). At its worst, it got an amazing 15 in a row wrong (Super Bowls XVII through XXXII). Most amusingly, it credited the Philadelphia Eagles with an astonishing 33 Super Bowl wins they haven’t earned, to go with the 1 they have.

Below, I’ve gathered a dozen of my favorite responses, in sequential order.

all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Paul_Harts@mastodon.nl 1 points 4 hours ago

@parody you’re the lucky one because you use Siri in English, I guess. And then the results are deplorable. But, if you use Siri in other languages, say German (spoken by 130 million people) or Dutch (spoken by 25 million people) the results are totally useless or -even worse - completely wrong.

If it wouldn’t be Apple, the efforts would be endearing. But it’s about Apple, so it’s annoying and to the level of totally unbelievable that they messed up so badly.

[+] AcesFullOfKings@feddit.uk 7 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] parody 1 points 3 hours ago

Oh you love it come onnnn

Hey don’t click[*]

Tim wants u2 suffer so don’t let him fool you with his songs of innocence

[*]

Hope some Lemming/you finds this useful someday since Apple doesn’t shout much about Shortcuts

Noting: review actions before running, always for safety of course and in this case to set the light

And nvm if I misunderstood requirement 😉

[–] Infernal_pizza@lemm.ee 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Why not just rename the device to bedroom lights?

[–] korazail@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 9 hours ago

Not OP, but this is a principle thing. We should not have to change our behavior to make the computers work for us. They are unthinking, unfeeling tools, despite anyone's claims around "AI". They change for us.

That runs into a problem of tech literacy, though. If the companies running the tech we use don't have incentive to make it work better, you have to know how to do it yourself and that's generally not trivial. If I were OP, I'd look into self-hosted home automation. There's some overhead and tinkering required, but the customization and privacy gains are likely worth it.

Side note. Anyone have any knowledge of a Google Home Mini repurpose? I'm more of a software guy, and have no clue if or how I can make the hardware mine. I've been slowly removing my reliance on google products lately. I use it mostly as a speaker, though, so worst case is it ends up as e-waste.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 12 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I only use siri to start timers while cooking, do quick math and conversions, and to text my wife that I’m on my way home while driving.

[–] DrCake@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Yeah same here. I’m not sure if I’d use Siri more if it were better, but to be honest I don’t really need all these ChatGPT stuff. Just make Siri better at the basic stuff it can already do.

[–] connaisseur@feddit.org 1 points 16 hours ago

That‘s about the only things it can do accident free indeed.