this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)

Cybersecurity

6732 readers
233 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Community Rules

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !securitynews@infosec.pub !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Why is Cloudflare monitoring/recording our passwords on the sites they are supposed to be protecting?

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 7 points 7 hours ago

Because Cloudflare users enable the feature?

It's literally opt-in.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

While I understand that password reuse is a problem I also understand that remembering 50+ passwords, because literally everything requires you to make an account, is impossible. And some of these password managers seem shady themselves. And if said manager needs a password that means someone only needs the one password which puts us back at square one.

These days I've resorted to physically writing my passwords down because I straight up don't trust anything that connects to the internet anymore for this kind of information. Like some lame puzzle in a video game where you have to look around the room for the password. But it still feels safer than anything that's connected to the internet.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

How about KeePass then? It's an encrypted local database file you can sync/backup how and where you want. There are clients to open/edit it for Android, Linux and even Windows. The Android version can use fingerprint, if your phone has this hardware.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

My main issue is that it doesn't solve the "borrowing someone's computer" problem. With a hosted password manager, you can login to an online vault to get your passwords, but that's not an option with keepass.

That's a pretty rare use case though, but it is something I run into periodically.

[–] isaaclw@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I use lastpass and have my vault on my phone.

But I have a hard time using someone else's browser these days . .. too many custom plugins.

[–] Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com 4 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

This feels a little too tinfoil-hat for me. The reality is that one strong password is going to be more secure than 50 weak passwords. If you use something like a passphrase with 30+ characters, cracking it with today’s methods will take longer than the heat death of the universe. Yes, it means all of your eggs are in one basket. But that’s why it’s important that basket is protected like Fort Knox.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

And change the master password every year or two, which likely also upgrades the key used to encrypt your secrets. Someone breaking into your password manager is a lot less likely than someone breaking into one of the dozens or even hundreds of services you probably reuse passwords on.

[–] Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Someone breaking into your password manager is a lot less likely than someone breaking into one of the dozens or even hundreds of services you probably reuse passwords on.

Exactly. Without a password manager, every single service you have reuses your password on is a security risk, because any one of them will compromise the rest. And it has repeatedly been demonstrated that even large software companies don’t follow best practices regarding passwords. So any one of them being compromised is a risk. With a password manager, as long as it is properly encrypted and secured with a strong master password, the only point of attack will be your master password.

It’s less about keeping all your eggs in one basket, and more about reducing attack vectors that hackers have access to. With reused passwords, every single individual service is a potential vector of attack.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

And do yourself a favor and get MFA on that password manager. That dramatically increases the skill level needed to hack your master pass.

[–] Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Several of the larger password managers have started requiring MFA on new accounts. Bitwarden, for example, now requires at least an email verification. They encourage you to use other MFA methods instead, like an Authenticator app. But they at least have the email as a last-ditch “fucking fine, you really don’t want to install an Authenticator app? Here, we’re forcing you to use this as the bare minimum” backup.

And that's how it should be. In fact, I switched banks to the only one I could find that had MFA, because I value security as an option.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

This feels a little too tinfoil-hat for me.

Nah a lot of those services are ripe for abuse... The correct answer is to just use your own... keepass for "offline" on a USB stick type of thing... or host your own vaultwarden.