this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
122 points (93.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

30409 readers
1399 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With the boycott for Teslas seemingly going strong I was wondering if anyone has successfully removed the proprietary software off any of the models or removed it from the Tesla network?

Considering that the cameras send data to other cars on the network to be processed (using the customers power instead of the company's) this seems better than just reselling to me.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skysurfer@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

The main things are removing the cellular connection and disabling the connection back to the Tesla services. Back in the old days you could pull the SIM card, root the center and driver's displays, setup firewall rules to block traffic to/from the Tesla servers, and disable the VPN.

This is more difficult with the newer models. You can still pull the SIM, but would need to get creative for root access since it is a continuous game of whack-a-mole between the root methods and patches.

[–] mortalic@lemmy.world 75 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Ok since no one here is giving actual information, there was a guy on Rich Rebuilds channel a few years ago that had done a lot of work in this space. I think it was this video: https://youtu.be/o-7b1waoj9Q

Any way, at the time he had made a ton of progress on the hardware. I don't have the mental energy right now to dig in to see how it's gone, but feel free to do so and post back.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 4 days ago (2 children)

the world following the end of the era where you could fix and work on your car

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 23 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Not necessarily. Even modern ICE V8 engines share little with their predecessors from the 1950s outside of their basic designs, yet people figured these systems out and are able to tune them with their laptops using third party software to achieve performance you'd never see from an old carbed small block Chevy with mechanical ignition. This era could be a new frontier in performance modifications.

[–] mortalic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Maybe you don't realize but one of the major issues with modern cars is firmware compatibility. Porsche is super egregious about it, others do it. But basically let's say you take a gearbox out of a specific car because it's wrecked. You need a laptop from a dealer to pair the replacement. They not only will not sell you the software or connector, they have legal protections that say they don't have to.

[–] DrownedRats@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

That's pretty cool honesty.

However, I'm personally more concerned about the move away from cheap, off the shelf, replacement parts and simple, standardised designs, and more towards costly assemblies, highly integrated mechanical designs that are very complex to disassemble and repair, and deliberately anti-repair preactices that push consumers back towards manufacturers like how phones and laptops have become recently.

I was talking to a coworker the other day about how even simple things like car headlights have become severely integrated and expensive.

When an led in his headlight blew and took out half of the series strip and rendered the entire indicator on one side of his car entirely dead, the only replacement part you could get for it was a replacement headlight cluster, all lights included, for around £500. To replace the cluster meant borderline stripping the front end of the car including the radiator to access 5 screws holding it in place.

On my old car from the mid 2000s, if an indicator light blew, I could fit a new one for £2.50 in under 10 mins. If the cluster smashed a brand new unit would set me back £25 now or around £50 back when it was new. The whole job could be completed though the open bonnet with only a screwdriver.

[–] mortalic@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Hell, even DRIVE your car.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Here's the guy's channel, Rich Rebuilds, if anyone is curious- invidious link: https://iv.ggtyler.dev/channel/UCfV0_wbjG8KJADuZT2ct4SA

or yt if you are into that place: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfV0_wbjG8KJADuZT2ct4SA

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What is in invidious and ggtyler.dev?

[–] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Invidious is an alternative to YouTube. It scrapes the content and presents it to you without trackers or googlerithms, or adverts.

So obviously in a big cat-mouse game with Google over it working or not.

Edit: it's federated, I think - or at least instance based, so anyone* can set one up and stick it online.

*anyone with servers and the hacker chops to be a network admin

[–] AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Feel ya on that energy part

[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 51 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like it would require a huge amount of reverse engineering and during the process you don't have a usable car.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 30 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Or before, since Elon Musk can personally disable your vehicle remotely if he wants to, and has done so.

[–] invertedspear@lemm.ee 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’ve seen a few classic cars retro fitted with Tesla batteries and engines from junkyard teslas. A common thread in that space is that you don’t get high speed charging. There weren’t really alternatives to super chargers at that time, so maybe they can use the other high speed chargers these days. Anyway, that’s tells me it’s possible, but that’s an extreme end of it. Just removing software probably requires a lot of specialized knowledge.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Oh that probably is a good place to look into. I know for some cars changing out the whole ECU is needed to go FOSS, so buying parts might just be what's needed if the DRM sucks to much on them. Junked Tesla rebuilds or retrofits using them probably have all sorts of what to use if you don't have (or in this don't want to use) XYZ part

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Lol, second post about this in a week. Guess nobody wants to buy a used Tesla?

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago

I can only imagine lol Honestly just looking for alternatives for people that can't afford to sell it and scraping it is a waste of the hard work people put into making it.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 25 points 4 days ago

I recall some of them having a chip flaw that allowed root access. If memory serves me it was something that could not be patched. I stopped following Tesla stuff after that because of Elon and deciding not to support him.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

With the boycott for Teslas seemingly going strong I was wondering if anyone has successfully removed the proprietary software off any of the models

This will be a herculean effort.

or removed it from the Tesla network?

This one should be fairly straight forward. There are a number of radios in the car. Some could be disabled or neutered fairly easily. Others would require workarounds to preserve require functionality.

As far as I know there are four radios:

  • Mobile phone network - (AT&T in the USA I think). This is not required for the car to function. Antennas could be disconnected and shorted at the board connector
  • Wifi - this is pretty easy. Simply remove any configured Wifi connections configured in the car. The one exception to this is I've heard some Superchargers have "free wifi" which means if you're in range of one of these, your car could attach to it as these may be preconfigred
  • NFC - this one isn't really a risk as its such low range, and as far as I know, its only used for key access to get in the car or put it in drive when Bluetooth auth isn't detected. No modification needed to this, and no risk to keeping it in place as is. bluetooth LE
  • Bluetooth - this one may be the most difficult because its used by most users as the keys to unlock the car. These radios are also capable of high speed data transfer at decent range up to 100 meters. While I don't have any knowledge this is used currently for data transfer outside of the car to the Tesla mothership, it certainly has the possibility of doing so with software changes in the future. The antennas for these are in the rear view mirrors, so they could be disconnected/shorted to neuter it.
[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 11 points 4 days ago (5 children)

What do they use to do the OTA updates for many of their recalls? I would assume the 4G connection, but if that were disabled, the car still functions the same?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

OTA updates default to wifi first. If you don't have wifi configured to a site, you'll still get notified of an OTA update via the 4G. If enough time goes by they will force the OTA update to download over the 4G then nag you whenever the car is put in drive to apply the update.

So yes, leaving wifi unconfigured (avoiding superchargers with free wifi) and disabling the 4G will prevent any future updates and the car still functions.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DudeDudenson 8 points 3 days ago

A lot of V8 Teslas on YouTube that seem to work alright

Reminds me of a documentary i watched about deprogramming the hitler youth

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

what does hacking a tesla have to do with not buying a tesla?

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Selling your tesla means someone else has to buy it. I think hacking a tesla to turn it into something different (like turning a mac into a hackinotsh) is a morally acceptable alternative. Bonus points for putting a new badge on it.

[–] DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A hackintosh is running MacOS on non-Mac hardware

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My bad.

Didn't know anyone wanted to do that. /s

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why wouldn't you want to do that? Besides legal and hardware compatibility

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There's a whole world out there and you'd willingly sit in jail? Sorry, I mean sit in a walled garden?

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago

Afaik you can still use any compatible software you want on a Mac; with the apple silicon chips that may be changing, and they might require installs from the apple store. IDK if it is-- you tell me. Big sad if it is.

For me a big draw of using Linux on my PC was to have another option for the OS and desktop environment, even if getting software I wanted was more difficult or impossible. I would be into trying this with Mac, if it weren't so difficult / expensive (to do it legally).

load more comments
view more: next ›