this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
108 points (99.1% liked)

politics

22503 readers
4402 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump announced plans to impose sweeping 25% tariffs on cars from overseas on Wednesday, days before the US president is expected to announce wide-ranging levies on other goods from around the world.

“What we’re going to be doing is a 25% tariff for all cars that are not made in the United States,” Trump said in the Oval Office. “We start off with a 2.5% base, which is what we’re at, and go to 25%.”

The announcement drew swift condemnation from the European Union and from the Canadian prime minister, Mark Carney, who called it a “direct attack” on Canadian workers. “We will defend our workers, we will defend our companies, we will defend our country, and we will defend it together,” Carney said.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Another 25% tax on Americans who purchase foreign-made cars. Glad I don't need a new car now, since I would not buy any shitty Ford / Chevy / GM vehicle made in the USA. My German car is still running great after 10 years of use, has never needed any engine or transmission repair.

Look at the fine print. The US car companies might be the worst hit since the tariffs also apply on various sub-assemblies that mean an additive tariff of 50-100+ on them.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 days ago

Fuck yeah. Ban cars! Great move for humanity and the planet.

[–] blakenong 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I’m all for buying locally made products, but making those products better is the way to get people to buy them.

Trump doesn’t actually care about the economy, he cares about people doing what he says and now he’s got his sights on the rest of the world.

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Fun fact, most of the cars made in the US are from foreign manufacturers.

Domestic manufacturers produce their cars in Mexico and Canada.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm going to laugh when F150s and shit skyrocket in price while Ridgelines and Tacomas drop.

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You mean like they already did?

I'm not sure what the fuck they've been thinking but all three domestic automakers priced their trucks so high they couldn't get them off the lot.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I have noticed that the Honda and Toyota dealers near me are usually pretty empty, while the domestic brands are pretty full.

[–] blakenong 1 points 3 days ago

Looks like I won’t have a problem finding a quality car then

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Do you know why things are made in China? Because safety is expensive. Labor rights are expensive. Environmental protection is expensive. Basic human rights are expensive.

As much "America bad" you have in your head, America still has all those things, and things made in America are expensive.

What sells more, a cheap shirt from Walmart or one from a boutique?

[–] blakenong 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The one from a boutique is probably made in china. The issue is all the manufacturers decided that they could profit more by leaving. You say “labor right are expensive” you mean a fair wage? I mean, it’s not actually that expensive when a company is pulling in billions in profit. If you didn’t know what a corporate shill was, you do now.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think we're agreeing?

Fair wages, not stealing wages, breaks, all that is extremely expensive compared to not.

Expensive means less profits.

[–] blakenong 1 points 3 days ago

Right. Which is fine. Less is actually fine.

[–] The_Caretaker@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I hate cars and anything that makes them more expensive and less desirable is a win as far as I'm concerned. Japan probably won't be happy about this though. Cars are a major export for Japan and the USA is a major buyer of Japanese cars. Trump just keeps fucking America's allies and trade partners.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

A lot of Japanese cars are made in the US. Ironically, most American cars are made in Canada and Mexico.

[–] Idontevenknowanymore@mander.xyz 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A point I saw in another thread is sticking with me: Insurance rates for foreign car owners will go up too because replacement parts are going to get more expensive.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Lol not just foreign cars. Domestic cars have a lot of parts manufactured in Mexico and Canada. Prices are going up for just about everyone.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This isn't even a Trump thing, I'll take the bus or buy a foreign made junker before I'd waste my money on an American car. They're crap.

The only thing we export of any quality are the means of mass murder, and that's something to be ashamed of.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Lmao. I knew the cars I have now would last the rest of my life.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Stick with this one you coward. This is his only policy I approve of so far.

[–] FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because you're anti car? Or what's the resson this one makes sense compared to all the others?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yes, cars undeniably make the world a much worse place and I am in favor of sin taxes. It’s also a fairly easy tariff to avoid by keeping or repairing an older vehicle—or even better, don’t drive one at all for those who can avoid it.

[–] FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Car culture does suck and ideally we could move towards urban areas being much less car dependent. I think we agree there.

Increasing the cost of new vehicles, which are already too high is only going to incentive keeping cars that produce comparatively more emissions on the road. We should be incentizing replacing old gas cars with newer electric vehicles while also working on public transportation and walkable areas where possible.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I just don’t think electric vehicles do enough given the scale of the crisis we’re experiencing, and I think placing economic pressure in car drivers is bound to reduce driving somewhat. Since this is one of or perhaps even the most damaging behavior in American society right now, that can only be a good thing. It will also increase demand for car alternatives which are desperately needed.

Is it the perfect policy or the one I would have pushed for? No, and it’s bound to be economically destructive as well, but it’s still pushing things in the right direction overall.

[–] FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

I get it. I would still rather it just apply to gas guzzlers. Let electrics get a foot hold. To get vehicles off the road let's embrace work from home policies again, instead of forcing everyone to commute in traffic.