A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.
Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:
If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.
Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.
Pants used to be two parts that were joined by lacing them together like shoes at the crotch. So weaving lashed together from the belly button to the groin to the ass and back up to the lower back.
I believe puffy white undershorts would be worn underneath, and sometimes a codpiece.
Another possibility is that "pants" comes from "pantaloons." Like some other nouns ("scissors" comes to mind), they appear to be plural, and so people tend to attach other designations of plurality to them.
https://www.britannica.com/story/why-do-we-say-a-pair-of-pants
That's a whole image right there .. got any evidence of this?
That's interesting. The Encyclopaedia Britannica appears to contradict this, stating:
However, there doesn’t seem to be much evidence in reference sources to support this theory.
Source: see the reply by @Nougat@fedia.io to you.
It is also true that pants were originally two separate legs, lashed as shown. But that might not be the reason we refer to them as a "pair of pants."
There are plenty of examples on medieval paintings, though.
women wear a pair of panties but only one bra.
🤯
For some items like glasses it's very clear why they are pairs; if you can have a reading glass (which is an antiquated way to refer to a handheld magnifying lens, for example) then you can certainly have a pair of reading glasses because it's the two pieces of glass which are plural.
For trousers there are no certain answers, but I'd suggest it's very much with with how we conceptualise their function. For 90% of their height trousers are split and cover the legs, of which we have two, only joining right at the top.
For shirts you might think it's the same (two arms right?) but it's a completely different story because the primary function of a shirt isn't to cover the arms but to cover the torso. So it's singular. And gloves of course are distinct, so it's back to pairs.
What about a brassiere?
Same logic, the bra itself as a whole is a chest covering, so like a shirt it's not a "pair"
Not that there always has to be logic in these things, etymology sometimes defies that.
A bra does have a "pair of cups", though!
A pair of pliers is just one tool.
And an au pair is just one person, usually a woman, and they aren't made of a piece of gold, much less two.
Checkmate, linguists!
Trousers are plural because originally they were only a pair of legs (without anything between!) and were tied to a belt.
EDIT: Originally Celtic, "Brax" or latinized "Bracae", IIRC.
You can't wear one leg each from two different pairs of jeans and go about your daily business.
Well not with that attitude you can't! I can think of several ways to accomplish this
😂
A pair of scissors. Is this an English grammar rule when 2 parts are connected to function as one it's still a pair.?
I'd say it's less of a grammar rule and more about how things made up of two similar parts can be conceptualised
My two cents, from a french perspectice : we say "a pair of scissors" and "a pair of glasses" but never "a pair of jeans". For the glasses, it kinda make sense since you can wear only one glass at a time though it's highly unpractical. For the scissors it make sense if you consider one scissor to be one blade with a handle. I perfectly understand your rant on the jeans point.
Apologies if this was perceived as a rant .. I'm genuinely interested in discovering why we refer to a pair of jeans.
As for glasses. In the time of monocles that might have made sense, but I've never seen anyone wear two of them.
Im not 100% sure what rant means, I didnt want to imply negativity, sorry for that. This really felt like a legitimate remark to me!
Yup, for the glasses, it's definitely an explanation of why we used to call them that way, the justification does not have much sense nowadays.
Rant:
to speak, write or shout in a loud, uncontrolled, or angry way
Source: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/rant
They're made up of two similar parts which form a pair, unlike a jumper
You have jumpers with one sleeve?
Edit: A bra is symmetrical and has two cups, but it's not called a pair of brassieres.
A jumper is a bad example, because it's not just made up of sleeves.
A bra is a much better example. But I was never making an argument that all things made up of two parts are referred to as a pair, just my thoughts on the rationale behind cases where we do.
Understood.
Could that be because it's a French word and they pluralise differently?
I guess each leg qualifies as its own jean?
A pair of jeans for a pair of legs.
Good jeans are two pieces of jean material, stitched together with an orange threading into a pant shape. Pair of jeans is prob from that.
Calling them "a pant" just sounds awkward tho.
