this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
775 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

68244 readers
6418 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It garbles advertisers' data as a result, but you must disable uBlock Origin to run it; they can't work simultaneously. I recently moved to it and, so far, am never looking back!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lumony 52 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I've been recommending this for awhile, it's nice to see someone else take up the mantle.

Yes, it clicks ads in addition to blocking them. Google removed it from its addon repository even though it wasn't breaking any rules. They just removed it and kept it removed because there wasn't sufficient backlash, the scumbags.

It's the main reason why I use Firefox these days. it's clear that the cabal will not allow anything that legitimately threatens their power structure, and make advertising less-effective for the same price is a gut punch they need.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Automated ad clicks probably are breaking the rules, TBF.

[–] wonderfulvoltaire@lemmy.zip 13 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CPMSP@midwest.social 2 points 34 minutes ago

That comment is correct on so many levels...

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Good start. Now make a version that clicks each ad a random number of times from randomly generated IP addresses.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Ad Networks use browser fingerprinting to detect duplicate clicks, which is tied to your hardware, system locale, installed fonts etc.

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 18 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Sounds like a solvable problem

[–] viking@infosec.pub 24 points 20 hours ago

Chameleon add-on for Firefox, randomly rotates your browser, OS, screen size, timezone, device type, language, and other customizable parameters every x minutes.

I've set it to do so every 5 minutes, and to omit desktop & tablet as device types (else some websites display the respective page) and timezones (messed up 2FA).

I also disabled blackberry and windows phone from the manufacturer ID, that would have the opposite effect from obscuring me.

For the rest of it, it's working great.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 4 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Tell me how, then, because I don't know how to get around the font thing. Everybody's computer has a different set of fonts, and blocking browsers from seeing what fonts you have installed would help identify you even more.

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 10 points 18 hours ago

A browser extension that limits webpages to default Windows fonts only would eliminate that factor from contributing to identification without flagging it as suspicious. A slightly more robust version could frequently cycle between multiple subsets of default Windows fonts. Say Windows comes with 100 fonts. So you could have thousands of configurations with different subsets of those.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That one browser which everyone hates despite it being the best adblocker and anti-surveillance browser out there randomizes your fingerprint.

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 3 points 18 hours ago

"Just" remove a random 2.5% of the fonts, a different random set per request (context).

[–] Tja@programming.dev 46 points 1 day ago (13 children)

That's not how IP addresses work.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

What if we use a Visual Basic UI to hack the IP address by netmask?

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 4 points 16 hours ago

Yes, but this only works if you connect your VPN via 3 block chain proxies.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 13 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

maybe we can setup a botnet to poison advertiser data.

click all the ads, all over the planet!

[–] lumony 6 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Why are you people so concerned about "the data?" Talk about missing the forest for the trees.

This is an effective tool to charge advertisers money without having their ads shoved in our faces. It directly undermines the integrity of the digital advertising ecosystem, and you people are obsessed with "privacy" because your priorities have been decided for you by your oppressors.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

what oppressors want me to worry about privacy? what planet are they in?

those people are literally using it to sell us fascism...

[–] SavageCoconut@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

I liked your post ❤️

[–] randamumaki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 21 hours ago

Feed it SQL injections?

[–] Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Have it form connections to all the other browsers using the extension and they all send a click.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (5 children)

now you've broken the law by creating a botnet.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

"He who save his country does not violate the law" 😏

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago

This would still make a connection to the ad servers that can then track me though.

I guess with a hardened browser and a VPN it would be alright.

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 119 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know this is the good shit because when it first came out a few years back google was running a huge disinformation campaign against it. You'd search for "adnauseum" in google and the first result would be an article from some weird advertising company calling is "insecure" and "malware" without any actual argumentation behind those claims, while no other search engine returned that article (I lost the screenshots, so yall are just gonna have to take my word for it). They also delisted it from the chrome store for not discernible reason. They were afraid.

But nowadays I'm willing to bet that they figured out how to detect adnauseum's fake clicks and filtering it out. Stuff like that needs a talented development team to keep it up to date.

[–] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Has the same limitations as uBlock Origin with Manifest v3 and won't work in Chrome.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 149 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If you're still using chrome at this point that's on you.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 2 points 58 minutes ago

I was actually curious about this as we're forced to use Edge or.Chrome at work.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 day ago

The solution is simple. Chrome ditches manifest v2? Ditch Chrome.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 92 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I always liked using this on the premise of privacy-through-obfuscation. If the powers that be must get information from me, then i'd prefer to give them garbage information.

[–] lumony 8 points 20 hours ago

I always like this on the premise of charging advertisers money while giving them no audience in return.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

Exactly. You can't completely avoid being tracked but you can ensure that your profile is just noise without any value to advertisers

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rimu@piefed.social 86 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Google has put a lot of effort into detecting and blocking stuff like this. They call it "click fraud", if you want to look it up.

It'll just mean they start ignoring clicks from you.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 19 hours ago

Then that achieves the same goal. If they're ignoring clicks from you, and you're blocking their trackers, then they probably don't have a good profile on you, because whatever they do have is either old, poisoned, or both.

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That, I guess, it’s the whole point. Stopping being tracked 🙂

[–] cageythree@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 day ago

This feels like reverse psychology on a little kid.

"That's it, I'm not tracking you anymore! >:("
"Oooh nooo, what have I done! Oh how much I would wish to be tracked :("
"No, you won't convince me to change my mind >:("
"Oh well, guess I'll have to live without being tracked, what a shame that is."

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They call it “click fraud”,

No, click fraud is using botnets to click ads in your site to increase your revenue.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

When Google can't extract money from you that's fraud!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›