108
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The first shot that protects all infants against respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV, won the unanimous backing of an advisory panel to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Thursday.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Anyone with a small child very clearly remembers how brutal last years RSV season was. I bet adoption is going to be high, get it before they have supply constraints.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

It will continue to get worse due to the antivax movement. They will go full swing against this vaccine.

It's unfortunate that in the 21st century, we are moving backward in the world. We should be exploring the universe and cure all diseases. Yet, we have a large majority of Americans who want to take us backward.

[-] gabe@literature.cafe 8 points 1 year ago

And I think it’s going to be completely reasonable when parents of young children state those that refuse the vaccine aren’t going anywhere near their kids

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

My kids got it, I got it.

It took me weeks to recover. I know they say it usually don’t hit adults too hard, but damn I was miserable.

All the jokers who came in my store saying, “I gawts thuh awr ays veeee” knowing I have babies too. If I ever lost my damn mind and just started cracking skulls it would be because some sick jackass knowingly coughs at me.

I’m thankful that parents will have this. My poor little babies just cried and moped for days.

[-] MicroWave@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

RSV is the leading cause of hospitalization among infants in the U.S. The shot, branded under the name Beyfortus, would provide families with a simple option to protect their babies during the respiratory virus season.

[-] TommySalami@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is great news after last year. I saw so many sick babies and miserable kiddos. It'd be great to have something to let them avoid all of that!

[-] gifferqqq@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Note that this is a monoclonal antibody injection and not a vaccine. This means that it will be way more expensive and protection will only last a few months at most. This is still a good thing for that are young and don't mount great immune responses, but an actual vaccine approved for this age group is still needed.

[-] frenchdresses@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

So does that mean that you should wait until the baby catches RSV before injection?

Will the baby's immune system not learn how to fight RSV then?

[-] gifferqqq@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

No this drug is actually approved for prevention and not treatment.

It probably would reduce the chance they would get sick and get natural immunity. However a RSV vaccine for infants is hopefully not far off so they can gain immunity that way.

this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
108 points (100.0% liked)

News

23259 readers
2831 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS