this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
223 points (95.9% liked)

Games

18590 readers
589 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 34 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What the fuck? Yes. Yes we fucking are. MAKE ANOTHER ELDER SCROLLS GAME, YOU ASSBAGS!

[–] bilb@lem.monster 20 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's gonna be shitty, expensive, AND buggy.

Look forward to the disappointment or just accept that late stage capitalism has ruined all of our lives and everything that we enjoyed, and it's only going to get worse.

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 5 points 6 days ago

That's how every TES game was: shitty, expensive and buggy. With zero bugs fixed after a decade since the release. Bethesda is extremely consistent, I'll give them that.

The horrible thing is that it doesn't have to suck.

Take Gamebryo, make Skyrim in a new map, new quests, scale it up for modern hardware a little, hire some voice actors and sell it. They could give everyone exactly what they expect.

They just won't. Everything has to be some grandiose overhaul for the sake of bullshit when it comes to Todd Howard and Microsoft.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

It's from 2011, of course it's old.

Maybe an unpopular opinion, but I’m glad no new Elder Scrolls game is coming out. With the enshittification of Bethesda, the announcement of TES6 coming out would just hype everyone only for it to be a buggy, microtransaction-filled trashcan. See Starfield.

I’m more hyped for Skyblivion than for TES6.

I mean it's a 14 year old game isn't it?

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

If I had a dog that was born in 2011 I would call him old.

I personally think games age faster than dogs ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Hafler@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago

It's impossible for it to be old. They keep releasing it, making it new every time. Just last week, they announced that it will be released on my toaster this summer.

[–] Elkot@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

It is an old game, technically it was an old game when it was released

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 117 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Skyrim is older now than Half Life 1 was when Skyrim first released.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Skyrim is older now than Tetris was when Half Life 1 first released.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 5 points 6 days ago

I'm not old, you're old!

[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Thanks to the innovation and progress happening in Bethesda, it's also a new game!

[–] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'm playing Neverwinter Nights right now T_T

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Come on, it came out 11/11/11, that was like 3 years ago right?

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 11 points 1 week ago

Oh my sweet ~~summer~~ winter ~~child~~ geezer.

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 69 points 1 week ago (10 children)

2011 was 14 years ago, the game is more than half my age x3

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do you often formulate math problems spontaneously?

[–] Damage@feddit.it 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

Yeah otherwise that’s a 9 year old posting

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teft@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

When I was really getting into PC gaming in 2003 a game from 14 years before would have been released in 1989. Yes, I'd say that was old!

[–] JackDark@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't like how time works.

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Morrowind to Oblivion to Skyrim was 9 years TOTAL. (2002, 2006, 2011)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Let's put it like this- Skyrim is as old now as Final Fantasy VII was when it came out. If you had asked me then if Final Fantasy VII was an old game when Skyrim came out, I'd have said yeah.

[–] Mallspice@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes but more that that, not just old games should be on GoG, all offline games should be on GoG.

[–] Benaaasaaas@group.lt 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Pretty much all DRM free games are on GoG no matter the age.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

You are inverting the logic there, all games on GoG are DRM free, but not all DRM free games are on GoG.

[–] Mallspice@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. Don’t need DRM unless multiplayer.

[–] Benaaasaaas@group.lt 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Multiplayer games also don't need DRM

[–] Mallspice@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I would say it’s essential for multiplayer games with servers because I wouldn’t want to host my games for free if I were a business and P2P connectivity is more hackable.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What? P2P is more hackable? Hacking just one central server is more difficult than hacking multiple P2P clients that check each other? That seems like strange reasoning. This really depends on the implementation, sure you can make it insecure, but you can also make it more secure.

And why wouldn't you want to host your own games when you want to play them together with others?

Hosting your own games also gives you much more power over it, you can mod it more easily etc.

IMO game developers of multiplayer games should also have to release dedicated servers to anyone that buys their game, so that they are still able to play the game, even if the game developer shuts the servers down, or their country is embargoed by the country where the game developer is located.

[–] Mallspice@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Depends on what you’re doing but yes because with p2p you don’t go through a server to implement a mod and you can break the game with less consequences.

For example it’s way easier to mod Space Marine 2 than Marvel Rivals, even though you can mod Rivals, because the server is required for spotting cheaters and banning them in more serious or competitive settings. Hence why Rivals players can mod skins in with some effort, but are liable to be ip banned if they use an aimbot in comp.

[–] termaxima@jlai.lu 15 points 1 week ago

If they ship it without DRM, they could label literally anything an “Old Game” and that’d be fine by me.

load more comments
view more: next ›