1008

Norway has succeeded in getting the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) to make permanent and extend across Europe its ban on Meta (Facebook's parent company) harvesting user data for targeted ads on Facebook and Instagram.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 158 points 10 months ago

Watch them cry foul, threaten to pull out, start a legal fight, then go nowhere like the abusive type they are.

[-] nicetriangle@kbin.social 79 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I wish they would pull out. It's fucking ridiculous that so much of Europe is apparently just ok with using a Meta product for the defacto texting platform (WhatsApp).

[-] Damage@feddit.it 46 points 10 months ago

Eh, it's not like we started using it because it was Meta's. They bought it when it was already popular, and switching everyone to something else is difficult.

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 9 points 10 months ago

Yeah, WhatsApp was ported to basically every single platform that was relevant in 2009-2010 when it launched: iOS, Android, Blackberry, Symbian, Series 40 and Windows Phone. Supporting Blackberry and Nokia mobile OS which were huge at the time as well as the new smartphone OS's was genius.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nicetriangle@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

Sure I understand the reasons why it's this way, but it doesn't make it a good idea.

[-] TheGreenGolem@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

Oh, it's Messenger in Hungary. Not that it's any better, just saying.

[-] nicetriangle@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I mean that’s basically the same difference. It’s owned by the same company.

[-] IndefiniteBen@leminal.space 4 points 10 months ago

But Messenger has always been Facebook, so those users "chose" a Facebook product. WhatsApp users mostly signed up before Facebook bought them (getting those users is why Facebook bought WhatsApp).

The choice to use a Facebook product was made for existing WhatsApp users by the sale. You can personally choose a different service, but then you also have to get all your contacts to make the same choice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 6 points 10 months ago

Meta is the cancer of the internet. The sooner they leave the better.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 104 points 10 months ago

Meta's practices also collected protected data like race, religion, and sexual orientation. Meta disputed that it needed explicit consent, arguing that agreeing to terms of service was enough, but courts rejected this.

Oh please let this be the beginning of a global backlash against corporate EULA's and the start of a path towards a few well understood EULA's, similar to how we have a few well understood FOSS licenses.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago
[-] casmael@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago
[-] amio@kbin.social 38 points 10 months ago

[chuckles evilly in Norwegian]

[-] levi@aussie.zone 32 points 10 months ago

This is awesome but I don't really understand.

The purported issue is that they don't have explicit consent for some data points. They apparently responded by saying they were going to charge a subscription.

Why wouldn't they just get consent? I'm sure most fb users will just agree to anything put in front of them.

[-] Krapulaolut@sopuli.xyz 68 points 10 months ago

Facebook collects data from various sites and doesn't care if you are a user or not.

How can you get a consent from someone who doesn't even know facebook collects data from?

[-] ra1d3n@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago

This is the funny thing. You don't. It has to be informed consent. ヾ(⌐■_■)ノ♪

[-] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Which makes Meta’s entire business illegal in the EU, thus the lawsuits and bans

[-] MrOxiMoron@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago

It's about the part where they can't hide the data collection in the terms and conditions of the site. You have to have a separate clear consent step for them to collect the data.

[-] kubica@kbin.social 24 points 10 months ago

However, regulators have questioned whether the prices are too high to give users a real choice.

[-] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

I bet there is something like what of they don’t consent? Then they have the choice to pay the subscription instead of being denied access to the site and therefore not make any money for Meta.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 10 months ago

I'd just like to thank the EU for having the data privacy laws that I suspect most Americans want but can't have because of the fact our country is owned by corporations

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tischkante@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 10 months ago

They're already starting their paid ad-free $10 a month tiers for Europe only. They'll stop showing advertising to underage people "for now". They're going to flood Europe with garbage ads and maximize subscribers that way.

[-] yoz@aussie.zone 18 points 10 months ago

I can't fathom people willing to pay $10 for Facebook and twitter .

[-] funktion@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Addiction is a hell of a thing

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] themurphy@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Hopefully they'll do that, so people would stop using their platform and move to a less money-hungry unetichal alternative.

[-] pufferfischerpulver@feddit.de 10 points 10 months ago

What would the alternative be? A genuine question. I'm not a Facebook fan at all but here in Denmark so much is on Facebook. Announcements of the local playground, cafés, events, almost everyone uses messenger. It's insane. And if it's not on FB then it's on Instagram.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] IndefiniteBen@leminal.space 6 points 10 months ago

Seems to be working for YouTube!

[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 11 points 10 months ago

And Amazon. Oh, and nowadays Microsoft has decided to join the club too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

a targeted advertising ban would kill just about every social media platform

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 16 points 10 months ago

They could just run contextual ads for much less effort and privacy violations, and still get the same or better result.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] dx1@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dx1@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Nice. As someone who deals with compliance I know it's gonna be a huge pain for them to deal with, which makes it even better.

[-] UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 10 months ago

Must be nice living in countries where the government works for humans instead of corporations.

[-] erranto@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

I will only believe it when I see it. It has been a few years since the EU is threatening a ban and meta threatening to leave the EU, so far none has committed any action.

[-] themurphy@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

EU didn't ban them because Meta complied. (the data protection bill, GDPR)

They will comply again, unfortunately. We could use a ban.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
1008 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

58137 readers
7137 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS