88

Many Americans, especially on the right, have rallied around two political creeds: support for the police and the right to armed self-defense. But what happens when #BackTheBlue and #StandYourGround conflict?

Consider the trial of Marvin Guy, which begins Monday in Bell County, north of Austin, Texas. In 2014, Killeen Police Department officers suspected he was selling drugs and a SWAT team raided the apartment where he and his girlfriend were asleep. They didn’t knock, and it’s unclear whether they announced themselves before smashing windows. “I fired out the window, having no idea it was the police, thinking it was a robbery, or somebody trying to come into the house to kill us,” Guy told The Washington Post last year. (He has acknowledged it was illegal for him to have firearms, due to a criminal record.) Police found “approximately one gram of suspected cocaine” on the property, according to The New York Times. Amid the exchange of fire, four officers were hit and one, Detective Charles Dinwiddie, was killed.

Prosecutors initially sought the death penalty but dropped it, so Guy faces life in prison on his capital murder charge. The trial will likely focus on whether he knew he was shooting at police. Jurors will undoubtedly be thinking about “stand your ground” and “castle doctrine” laws, which vary by state but generally give people the right to use deadly force when they are unable to retreat or inside their own homes.

Several high-profile shootings recently underscored the risks of these laws. The 2020 killing of Breonna Taylor during a raid in Louisville, Kentucky, ignited protests and led some states and cities to ban or restrict police from descending on a property without announcing themselves. Following Guy’s arrest, Killeen ended no-knock raids in drug cases. His upcoming trial is the latest example of the collision course between laws that give police the ability to surprise people, and laws that give people the right to shoot back.

Searching court records and news articles, I found nearly two dozen people who have been arrested since 1978 for shooting at officers during raids involving forcible entry or surprise. A New York Times analysis found at least 13 officers and 81 civilians had died in “forcible entry” raids from 2010 through 2016, and that even when police announced themselves before a late-night raid, people inside a house might not have heard them. Many were asleep. ...

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

No-knock raids for small time drug dealers is just a ridiculous idea. I can’t think of many scenarios where they do make sense at a private residence. If someone has such a small operation that they can get rid of all the evidence in one flush, they aren’t worth sending a SWAT team (and risking everyone’s life) for in the first place.

Like if it’s one guy suspected of dealing out of his only house, just wait until he goes to put the trash out or something wearing slippers and a bathrobe and have one cop roll up and say, “Hi, I’m Officer Smith. We have a warrant to search your house.” and then radio to your van full of colleagues a few blocks away. Achievement Unlocked: De-escalation.

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Yea but that doesn’t give them a chance to use all their military surplus breach and clear gear

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Imagine if swat showed up to a house that had a car bomb in the driveway. Might temper that zeal a little bit.

[-] BrotherL0v3@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Police found “approximately one gram of suspected cocaine” on the property, according to The New York Times.

  1. One gram is a tiny amount of anything. Being in the same room as Charlie Sheen probably gets 1g of cocaine on your clothes. /s

  2. "Approximately" is doing a lot of lifting if we're already talking about such a small amount.

  3. "Suspected" doesn't mean much. Did they find some white powder and just bag it up? Did they swab it with one of those in famously shitty field testing kits?

Say what you will about the guy outside of that, but pigs kicking in a guy's door and finding "maybe a quarter teaspoon of probably drugs" smells like bullshit.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Does any one know the street value of 1 g of suspected cocaine?

[-] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

About $10 to a high school kid, along with a $20 bag of oregano

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Less than the money spent on fuel to get the police vehicles to the victim's house.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

At least the cop died doing what he loved.

Ruining people's lives over tiny amounts of what might possibly be drugs.

[-] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

It’s not legal to break into peoples’ homes, and if cops or anyone else decides to do it with a weapon… that’s pretty much exactly what stand your ground exists for.

Sounds like a “not guilty” to me, and maybe next time the 4 cops that didn’t get killed will take a different approach.

[-] Talaraine@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

This right here. Activist juries are the only way forward through this stupid shit. They aren't listening otherwise.

[-] Abird1620@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Interestingly, depending on the state, no-knock warrants are used for situations that could be considered "high-risk" for officers. I'm not arguing whether or not it should be legal. I'm just say that as of now, many states allow no-knock warrants.

[-] El_guapazo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

If the issue is whether the police announced themselves, couldn't any future robbers just say that they're police as they break in? They just did a deeper hole.

[-] 1847953620@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Detective Charles Dimwitted, how appropriate.

this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
88 points (93.1% liked)

THE POLICE PROBLEM

2479 readers
145 users here now

    The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.

    99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.

    When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.

    When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."

    When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.

    Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.

    The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.

    All this is a path to a police state.

    In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.

    Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.

    That's the solution.

♦ ♦ ♦

Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.

If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.

Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.

Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.

♦ ♦ ♦

ALLIES

!abolition@slrpnk.net

!acab@lemmygrad.ml

r/ACAB

r/BadCopNoDonut/

Randy Balko

The Civil Rights Lawyer

The Honest Courtesan

Identity Project

MirandaWarning.org

♦ ♦ ♦

INFO

A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions

Adultification

Cops aren't supposed to be smart

Don't talk to the police.

Killings by law enforcement in Canada

Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom

Killings by law enforcement in the United States

Know your rights: Filming the police

Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)

Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.

Police lie under oath, a lot

Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak

Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street

Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States

So you wanna be a cop?

When the police knock on your door

♦ ♦ ♦

ORGANIZATIONS

Black Lives Matter

Campaign Zero

Innocence Project

The Marshall Project

Movement Law Lab

NAACP

National Police Accountability Project

Say Their Names

Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS