this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
16 points (68.2% liked)

politics

23397 readers
3752 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 44 points 2 weeks ago

Nate Silver? The gambling addict now funded by Peter Thiel to pump out pro-Trump analysis? That Nate Silver? The one who is no longer affiliated with FiveThirtyEight for undisclosed reasons?

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Polling pundit Nate Silver predicts Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) will be the 2028 Democratic presidential nominee.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I kinda dare them to run Trump against AOC. Too bad our voting machines aren't open source so they are transparent and Musk will likely control elections going forward.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Musk will likely control elections going forward

Elections are run by the states themselves even for federal office. Notable race in particular for Musk was the Wisconsin Supreme Court race earlier this month. Musk poured millions to try to make it go the other way and tried to bribe voters with $1 million lotteries if they "signed a petition against activist judges". The Musk backed candidate still lost by 10 points

Don't do his dirty work for him and suppress the vote before anything happens. The fight ain't over till it's over

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

The fight isnt over and I truly dont believe this is lasting 4 years in a similar state. He had access to voting machines in the 2024 election. I am positive there are plans to expand that access.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Trump can't run again, no matter what they keep saying about it. States control their own elections, and will not allow him on the ballot on the majority of the states because they actually give a shit about the constitution.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How much you wanna bet they're gonna do it anyway and red states will go along? Thats four years, though. Might as well be eternity in this climate.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

He literally cannot be President again according to the constitution. They MIGHT try to run someone else with him as VP, then have that person step down, but the Constiris crystal fucking clear on this.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah you also can't deport citizens lol the old world is dead. Theres only a few ways to revive it and they are dwindling fast.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Be a doomer, or get with action. Don't be so lame.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I just need you to realize how serious this is. Dont assume just because I'm admitting a deadline means I'm doing nothing. But 4 years is far too late.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well then your task is at hand, no? Why are you out here yelling at everyone else about it?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago

Gotta rile 'em up, too. Trump wants chaos, eh?

[–] LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Just block and move on. The doomerism is just another form of trolling but you can block the user and it’s like their doomed attitude got sent to El Salvador.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's less about social media interactions, and more being ashamed of people who solely sit online barking at other people rather than get off their asses and try to actually do something. The doomer defeatist attitude is just fucked up when we're about to lose our country.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Colorado's Supreme Court found that he engaged in an insurrection and was therefore ineligible. Then SCOTUS basically said "uh, this gives me the federal feelsies because it's a federal office, so Congress has to do it"

Feels like all Congress has to do is say that the first term didn't count. But to be honest I can see poor health catching up to him first anyway.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think you need a Tim Waltz. You need to peel back some MAGA and a white man would do just that.

We'll see, though, I would love to see AOC at the house.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'd rather her be Speaker of the House or go Senate and be party leader. Progressive needs to be more that a minority that's afraid to push too hard or get shut down by their own party. Plus both of those are more long-term positions of power, and in some ways more powerful than a President (well, legally). She can run for President later to finish off her political career.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

This would be a great path for her.

Yup. Aoc is perfect for a party leader.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

They've already picked newsom.