this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
960 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

69845 readers
3975 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 206 points 1 week ago

"You guys aren't gonna use AI for bad stuff, right?"

Tech oligarchs: whaaaaaat no we actually want to be regulated because of how dangerous this technology is!! Also tech oligarchs:

[–] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 184 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"The rules were that you guys weren’t going to fact-check."

Delivering that line with such glee like he thought he had some sort of high ground.

Makes me sick.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 133 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Remember when this stuff was called "the quiet part', and it was considered bad when you said it out loud?

Yeah...good times.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 99 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"what do you mean we can't use fake misleading videos to fuck democracy?"

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago

"The rules were you guys weren't gonna fact check."

[–] kubica@fedia.io 84 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Here the guy that was going to leave politics and go back to Tesla.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now now, fElon was simply placating Tesla investors on a very dark earnings call day.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Somehow I think they all wish for him to stay as far from the Tesla brand as possible.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 82 points 1 week ago

What a fucking chode.

If you need it to be legal to deepfake to manipulate politics you’re the problem.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well, this is a solid admission that they are going to use deep fakes to influence elections.

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Noo we just demand this specific instance of deregulation because... uh, it theoretically might help small businesses!

Also why would you even care about anything other than short-term GDP increase. Are you some kind of communist?!?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This is what the right is doing, while the DNC is censuring their own members for simply encouraging democrats to run against their own apathetic incumbents.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 8 points 1 week ago

You misspelled pathetic.

[–] Eldritch_Alyx@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (6 children)

How isn't this immediately a red flag?

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are so many flags right now it’s just a sea of red undulations. Done by design, so that we don’t notice the death of democracy.

[–] JonEFive@midwest.social 8 points 1 week ago

They overwhelm everyone knowing that 80% of this shit is gonna get outlawed or overturned, but that 20% that gets through is gonna be huge for them.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] phx@lemmy.ca 53 points 1 week ago

Cool. Let's go with criminal impersonation, defamation, and slander/libel instead them!

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago

And the Fake News crowd goes wild! By the way, that's conservatives and all of their media.

[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Can we join forces and spam X with a flood of Informative deep fakes of select individuals?

[–] suite403@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You could, but it would just be limited reach. There is no way to fight back using his own platform beyond just not going there.

[–] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Something that has been bothering me lately. Reasonable people who counter the toxic misinformation leaving the platform only allows the disease to grow and spread. But reality is they weren't reaching the people that needed the dose of reality anyway. And then I realized that the algorithms have always been the disease, my feeds are my own echo chamber to drive engagement, just as theirs are. I've pretty much cut all social networks out. The only way to change minds is honest respectable conversation, and I am not a person to change anyone's mind.

We're fucked

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Elon Musk, Republican President who is literally BANKROLLING THE ENTIRE REPUBLICAN PARTY, SUING because he can't Create Fake News with AI, is PROOF that DEMOCRATS are the Fake News!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

X’s lawsuit claims the law’s “requirements are so vague and unintelligible that social media platforms cannot understand what the statute permits and what it prohibits.”

Vague, overly broad laws are indeed a problem; I’m willing to give him that. ONLY that.

Unfortunately for Musk, this is not vague. If the footage is something you created or manipulated, you know perfectly damn well whether it’s legal or not. He’s trying to confuse the issue, and conflate fraud with free speech. Hopefully, the court will see right through him.

[–] Erasmus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Easy solution would be for the state to show up with an AI generated video of him giving an explanation as to why he (Elon) has no clue what he is talking about and this is obviously the greatest law ever.

Or maybe take the opposite stance…lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] obinice@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why would they want to "influence elections"?

Sounds shady.

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

It's a huge part of the business model. Social Media is valuable for its data on people, and for its ability to manipulate and influence people.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 week ago

“How will we win if we can’t cheat?”

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 week ago

Minnesota scraps that law and uses Elon's deepfakes to claim he wants to destroy Medicare

Elon calls for laws banning deepfakes

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (9 children)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Next up: Elmo challenges laws that prohibit murder and child pornography, all in the name of a better world!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

X’s lawsuit claims the law’s “requirements are so vague and unintelligible that social media platforms cannot understand what the statute permits and what it prohibits.”

The issue with this argument is that social media platforms aren't required to enforce it? https://www.sos.mn.gov/media/5626/deep-fake-overview.pdf

[–] tfowinder@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago

IAs far as I read this correctly, the law prohibits creating such media but does not hold the websites accountable for publishing the media.

It does indeed sound vague as to what the social media site should do.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

can elon and linda hurry up and die already

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Rich people live a lot longer than us.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Wait a minute. Are we the baddies?"

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can place a pretty hefty bet that this thought has not visited Elmos head.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JonEFive@midwest.social 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So is their position that deception via impersonation is free speech?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unrealizedrealities@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

MAY I LIE TO INFLUENCE ELECTIONS? yes, but.... FUCK YOU, I'LL LIE ANYWAY ON AN OVERLY ADVERTISED AND PROMOTED PLATFORM EVERYONE IS FORCED TO USE

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

They did more than influence the past election, and have plans to do the same in the upcoming ones... so ofcourse any regulation against these plans must be taken away.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Gee, I wonder why.

[–] skvlp@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

Elon, go crawl into a hole and stay there for the rest of your life. Ok?

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Something only a childish brat would even think to try

load more comments
view more: next ›