this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
511 points (94.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

31159 readers
4918 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Forget the handles because they all suck. The flared outer tines are a sin and the shorter tines on 1 is a war crime. I would take 3. Ergonomically it's not terrible and I can deal.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 6 points 3 days ago

You cannot know the answer without seeing the underside of the forks. How will you know if they correctly conform to the curvature of your thumb and/or fingers.

One of the best gifts my partner got me was completing a set of cutlery I had grown to love via eBay and other random shops. How she found decade old stuff in mint condition is beyond me.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 4 points 2 days ago
[–] ree2@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

#2 and #3 Edit: no just #2

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago
[–] obinice@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Hard to say. It's 1 or 3.

2 has an annoying bulbous handle that upsets the balance and the tines take up too much of the fork space, leaving too little room for the little shovel bit at the back that can hold things that might fall through the tines a bit better,

5 is an utter nightmare of awful.

[–] Mustakrakish@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

How thick are they?

[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shadowDingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i only eat spoons, they taste better

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Korne127@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

Some of y'all don't know about the yogurt test and it shows! 4 is the only correct answer.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago
[–] weariedfae@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago

2 but 3 would do as a second tier choice if 2 was dirty.

Also whoever said the tines of 2 and the handle of 5 is correct.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

2, 5 if there are no clean 2s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago
[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago
[–] skye@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago
  1. 1 is also nice, every other choice is heresy.
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

You come here asking neurodivergents a question and you only give five options?

All of these options are terrible. You should feel ashamed, OP.

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago
  1. But I'd still grab 5 just to watch the world burn.
[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

None of them are usable. If I had to take one, number 3. All the others are a sin.

Edi: I must agree with others though, that the handle of 3 is very bad. Still, the shape of the head is more important to me.

[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

#1 looks like it's for kids.

#3 & #4 aren't dry-fined enough.

A cross between #2 (weird end) & #5 (weird tip) would be perfect. In fact, I think mine at home is like that (on vacation right now so can't check).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RobotZap10000@feddit.nl 7 points 3 days ago

2, if I wanted it to be round, I'd have grabbed a spoon.

[–] Muffi@programming.dev 6 points 3 days ago

Obviously depends on what you're about to eat

[–] spacemanspiffy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

2, obviously

[–] argarath@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Handle of number 1, prongs of number 2.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

5 is an IKEA fork

Source: I have an IKEA fork

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tanuki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

None of these, I refuse to use forks, only sporks.

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

None of them; my forks are best

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ijon_the_human@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Anyone interested in developing a "Find your ideal fork" web app?

I for one would be very interested to see statistical preferences...

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Sounds awesome but I don't know on what metrics you could qualitatively categorize forks, except for some obvious ones like prong length, handle start thickness, handle uniformity, ...

Edit: Darn you, I didn't need yet another project in my long long list. Now I can't stop thinking about it.

[–] ijon_the_human@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Damn, I already have more ideas.

[–] ijon_the_human@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I have a couple of ideas but I don't know which would be the easiest.

We could analyse and break down forks to their design features and then let people mix and match. This would take a lot of time though.

Alternatively we could scrape a bunch of fork images and build a large dataset. Then show two at a time to users and let them pick their preferred one repeatedly until we know the preference hieararchy for that user. Then compare users and divide them into demographics.

I guess it would also be possible to have a visual model and some edit options like make different parts longer / thicker. I feel this is unnecessarily complicated.

Another idea would be to break the fork into two or three parts. Not perfect but faster than exploring all design features. Tines, body, end for instance and let people either mix and match or do some for of a/b testing.

My expertise is in design so I can help with those aspects but coding I unfortunately cannot do. Would be a really fun project designwise too...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Whimsical418@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] funkajunk@lemm.ee 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›