this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
506 points (87.4% liked)

Technology

69726 readers
3628 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 179 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Article is from 2018. Someone must have pasted the url from hacker news where the same story was dug up recently.

[–] nalinna@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Is that to say that it's no longer valid? Or just that it's old news? The list of apps associated with the software is still pretty extensive; Google Assistant even showed up.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Well these days Android asks for more permissions so I guess it would prevent it in many cases by preventing access to the microphone for apps where you don't want to allow it...

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Android also shows an indicator when any app is accessing the microphone or camera now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] thangcuoi@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

7 years is a long time in tech.

Google Assistant is supposed to listen for the "Hey Google" trigger word. How else do you expect to use your device hand-free.

[–] bonsai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago

No, 2018 wasn't 7 years ago... No... Wait please..! :'(

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Old news. It was old news in 2018

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 77 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

Wasn't there just a storey a couple days ago that apps where not doing this but taking screenshots and videos on the screen and sending that. And both iOS and Android have the microphone notification now.

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I know I'm usually on the more paranoid side, but I've always assumed everything I do on a smartphone is potentially being monitored via camera or mics.

If the apps are just taking screenshots, or recording a few seconds of data via mic, it would be almost guaranteed that certain corrupt (and also paranoid) governments that are dismissive of privacy rights could force or bribe those apps to allow them to also access screens, mics, and cameras anyway, right?

I'm in the U.S., and especially with how glitchy my phone has suddenly become over the last few months, I'm just at the point where I just assume that's what's going on.

I had the same android for like 4 years without many issues, then suddenly around February it just became almost impossible to use. Weird glitchy things with the size of the tool bar at the bottom of my screen and the popup keyboard. Redirect notifications all the time for certain websites, and my VPN connection is just constantly interrupted and having to be reset.

I finally was like fuck it, this is an old phone so maybe that's it. Brand new phone, but most of the same issues.

I use signal instead of text most of the time, and switched a lot of things to proton mail, but if someone is potentially recording your screen, does it really matter if what you're doing is encrypted?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] quartz@kbin.earth 71 points 1 week ago (6 children)

ok thanks, but where's the list of these apps?

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 37 points 1 week ago

These type of articles never list the apps they're discussing.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 48 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I used to work for a mobile advertiser, and we installed hella bloatware on phones.

This idea was floated a couple times but was deemed not very effective cause you'd have to store and process hours and hours of audio data that didn't tell us much more than just having a week or so of GPS data, your Facebook profile, and your phone IMEI.

It's pretty easy to see if you're near a Popeyes and what other IMEIs are connecting to the same tower, extrapolate that to you being near your wife and you and your wife thinking about shit on the Popeyes menu.

Boom targeted ad/video for fried chicken.

The rest is general tech paranoia leading to Apophenia.

There's no microphones or cameras, it's just the already gigantic mountain of data anyone who uses a smartphone is constantly broadcasting getting ground through the big data machine that has been the pillar of all tech since the last recession.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

you'd have to store and process hours and hours of audio data that didn't tell us much

I mean that could be solved as simply as a local transcription service...

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

And do what? Sentiment analysis on the conversation you were having?

Remember semantically aware models are still fairly new and even they lack the context for a particular field of text. That's something even the new fancy LLMs struggle with.

Unnecessary when there's way better targeted models trained on years of data that people willingly send as part of everyday smartphone use.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Korne127@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (13 children)

But… they can't access the microphone without the user explicitly allowing

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Tell that to Facebook. Shit, I'll talk about something with my wife and see ads about it ten minutes later. Been happening for years.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I tested this with my Facebook app in 2013. Found a Spanish radio station, set my phone down next to it overnight, and for several weeks I was seeing ads exclusively in Spanish. Deleted the app the first day I saw them in Spanish, and deleted my account not long after that.

My wife still uses them after 5 years together and me pointing out all the times it's obviously eavesdropping on us, and she's even been creeped out by it before. Still uses it...

Unless my microphone and camera have physical switches, I will assume they are being used. Those little "your camera and microphone are off" icons in the corner of the screen don't reassure me.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

That's monitoring you and your closests' other behavior, as well as monitoring then nudging you towards wanting certain things. The ad itself is the last nudge in that chain that tries to go "you wanted this, don't you?" after all of the other thinking it's making a case for your life being better with it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thangcuoi@lemm.ee 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It's more likely that your wife or someone nearby was further researching the same topic you were talking about.

Facebook and other ad companies use your location, relationships, and other data they already had on you to serve you relevant ads.

At this stage, they know more about you than the government, or your wife.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I’ve read about this phenomenon in the past. Generally it’s found that due to audio processing cost and the sheer amount of other data easily gathered, there’s no reason for them to snoop with your microphone because other data is so readily available, much easier to process, store and ship.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] dv48@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I thought Android has a non bypassable green dot in the notification bar when the micro is on ?

[–] SpaceScotsman@startrek.website 14 points 1 week ago

Users need to know what this dot means, and some like children or the elderly will likely not understand the ramifications

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Go ahead, make TVs more smart. We literally removed our TV thus weekend. If you want me to upgrade it, please removed the spyware.

[–] i2ndshenanigans@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (4 children)

My tvs are connected to an SSID that can’t hit the internet. I blocked them before but my dumb ass neighbor left their WiFi unprotected and my tvs just connected to them because it couldn’t get out the internet on my network. So I created an SSID logged them in and blocked it from the internet. It doesn’t bounce to open WiFi anymore. If I block it completely from the network the WiFi just disconnects from the network because it can’t hit anything. I have LG’s.

[–] cevn@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The fact that they just desperately jump on any network is absurd. Its acting like malware.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

That is an insane thing to have to do. Having to manipulate your TV into not doing something you don't want or require it to do.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Right around the confinement my sister and I were talking about getting some seeds for my mom. Neither of us searched for seeds. From that point we both started to get ads for seeds, many for the ones we had talked about in particular. This thing was so unequivocal that it proved to me that our phones listen. Maybe they don't analyze, but they definitely listen for words actionable for an advertising purposes.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I keep my phone in a chip bag and only pull it out to LARP the preparation for the assassination Franz Ferdinand in general terms without naming actual places or names.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

On the other hand, it's amazingly easy for advertisers to figure out what topics / products you're talking about without the need for constantly recording via your microphone. In most instances, it doesn't even really make sense to constantly record audio via the mic to monitor folks, other means are much more cost efficient while being just as effective. That's not to say that some app isn't or hasn't done it, just that historically speaking, it hasn't been as ubiquitous as a lot of people seem to think or imply.

Sometimes with these things, you have to apply Occam's Razor.

I stayed with some family during the holidays a few years ago and they are conspiracy theory fanatics unfortunately. The type that swear their phones are listening to everything they say. They get ads for things they've only ever talked about in person. That sort of thing.

As proof, they pointed out how the prior night the topic of old timey candy from our childhoods came up and all of a sudden they were getting news stories and facebook ads about those liquid filled wax bottle candies. To them, the only plausible explanation is that our phones were listening to us.

Except, as I pointed out, I specifically looked those wax bottle candies up later that night because I was curious if they were still for sale. They live way out in the country and there's limited cellular data, so basically everybody there that night was using the same wifi connection. Which means, our internet activity is all linked because to the outside world, we're all on the same network/IP address. Even more curious, though, nobody got ads for any of the other candy that we talked about and which I didn't specifically look up. So, if our phones were actually recording us and serving up ads based on the things we talked about, then why didn't we get ads for Blackjack gum, wax lips, and Brach's? Only the very specific one I happened to search for.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

Good thing everyone diligently reads the T&A of Pool 3d before using it. You are reading every line of text before you hit agree, and then uninstall, right?

[–] viking@infosec.pub 11 points 1 week ago (13 children)

And people wonder why I keep rooting my Android phones.

Without advanced permission denial and file access restrictions, phones will spy on anything and anyone.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›