this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
491 points (98.6% liked)

politics

23316 readers
2778 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 90 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Oohhhhh

All those Scotus justices making sure trump would be able to become king... Then they get nervous because king start behaving like a king and now king wants to kill them. Would could have seen this coming except everyone who has ever opened a history book?

These supreme Court justices are about as supreme as my ass.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

These supreme Court justices are about as supreme as my ass.

They aren't even as supreme as a chalupa from fucking taco bell.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] halferect@lemmy.world 55 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't understand how the scotus didn't see this coming. What do dictators hate? Anyone who has any possible power over them, so what do dictators do? Arrest or kill any possibility of opposition and number one was always gonna be scotus. They killed themselves

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

See, the thing is that conservatives always believe that they're deeper into the in group than they really are. They can't imagine themselves as part of the out group. Quick example, about five years back, I had a fox news addicted co-worker bitching at me about millennials. I was like "bro, we're in our thirties, we're not kids anymore", because he and I are both the same age, and both millennials. He looked like I just slapped him and said "no, I am NOT a millennial", so, because I physically cannot stop myself from arguing with anyone about anything, I spent five minutes proving to him that he was, in fact, a millennial. He put up the WOKE FAKE NEWS^tm^ defenses, cleared recent history, and was back to griping about millennials before the day was out, still supporting things that hurt millennials and not daring the imagine that Fox News could possibly be talking about him. He's the child of immigrants, he's got his citizenship by his dad being born here and him being born here. He supports rounding up brown people and ending birthright citizenship because he'll still believe right down to his core that they're not talking about him even as they're loading him into the box cars.

I would say it's a crisis of empathy, but I'm not sure that's completely true. I'm not going to fight people on Lemmy about it, but I personally know my own share of conservative people who have no problem with empathy (and many who do have a problem with it, in fairness). I think it's a distinct phenomenon that they really do believe that it could never happen to them, or to anyone who doesn't "deserve it". I've encountered that kind of circular logic quite a bit, where if their policies hurt you, it's probably because you deserved it, and their policies can't possibly hurt them because they know they don't deserve it.

[–] suicidaleggroll@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago

A lot of it comes down to the Just World Fallacy

They believe that, fundamentally, the world is just and good (mostly that stems from religion and a just "god", but not always). This means that when something bad happens, they assume the person must have deserved it, because bad things don't happen to good people. They also believe they are a good person, and therefore bad things won't happen to them. When something bad DOES happen to them, they start screaming from the rooftops that some radical injustice has occurred and somebody needs to do something to make it right! Completely unaware of the fact that nobody from their "tribe" will believe them, because the fact that something bad happened to them meant they must have been a bad person who deserved it.

[–] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I know quite a few spanish speaking people here who are hyper conservative. In general latin america is a greatly more conservative place than the US, so it's kind of amazing seeing the conservatives here targeting them.

Poorer immigrants usually work in conservative spaces for poverty wages especially if they are not fluent in English, but the conservatives want to kick them out and start the white breeding programs to get some more white homegrown poverty cases going in red states.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

They believe the law is always on the side of good, despite much evidence to the contrary, and the mere fact that the law can be changed making it intrinsically not a moral absolute.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 26 points 6 days ago

The SCOTUS justices who voted to make the president a king should've been dropped in a black site immediately upon that decision coming out, but Biden didn't have the fortitude or vision to protect the country from fascism.

Go do it then. Show America what they voted for.

[–] lemmy_acct_id_8647@lemmy.world 48 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I have never seen a face in as much need of meeting a high velocity crowbar as this cunt.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

If a small fraction of us did stuff like that, these problems would be resolved very, very quickly.

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 days ago

The politics of fascism is pure genocidal violence. It’s death camps and slaughter. The only language a fascist understands is violence.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Then you would damage all the gender affirming surgery she got to look pretty enough to be hired by a Trump.

lol good. Either we all have access to gender affirming healthcare or the rich can burn

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee 37 points 6 days ago (4 children)

This is why the Judicial branch needs to have its own fully separate, security forces/armed forces.

[–] arun@ani.social 14 points 6 days ago

In theory, yes. But not the fucking Roberts, Alito, et all court.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] The_Caretaker@lemm.ee 12 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Federal judges can deputize people and make them US Marshals to execute warrants. The federal judges could also send people to arrest Trump. They don't have the balls to do it, but its legal.

[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The federal judges could also send people to arrest Trump.

No, they cannot, because federal authorities won't prosecute a sitting US President. Only the House, by way of Impeachment, and the Senate, by way of conviction can anything be done about Trump now.

Additionally, SCOTUS gave the President total immunity when it comes to "official actions" which is not at all defined in any capacity, so the interpretation is up in the air. All's Trump has to do is argue that these are official actions and nothing can feasibly be done.

So he demands a sitting supreme court justice be arrested and they are. It goes to court and its found Trump can't do that. The judge is released, and nothing happens to Trump at all. So he tries again. And again. And again. Until he's finally successful.

Roe v. Wade was considered the law of the land and no one ever thought it could ever be overturned. Republicans tried for over 50 years to get it reversed which everyone agreed was a fools errand. And then they did... Just because something can't happen doesn't mean it really can't happen.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

3 things:

First off, you literally started an argument explaining that something can't happen, then ended it by saying that something that can't happen can happen, and that hurts my brain a bit.

Secondly, one reason reason a judge can deputize people is for cases where the executive branch or law enforcement has gone rogue and they need to enforce the law outside of the regular channels.

Third, the whole "Can't arrest or charge a sitting President for any crime" thing isn't a law, but a justice department policy. Deputized law enforcement and prosecutors from outside of the justice department wouldn't be bound by that policy.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

It's not even a policy, it's a literal post it note memo with no known author.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Listening to this blonde reincarnation of Ri Chun-hee is ... interesting. So close, she should wear pink. They did show a short statement by her on the BBC, and I counted more lies than sentences. Amazing.

[–] mcv@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Arrest them for corruption, perhaps? (He said hopefully)

Of course not. Only for disagreeing with him or not supporting his illegal crackdown on Americans he doesn't like.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›