Clinicallydepressedpoochie

If that were the entire story, maybe I agree, but it doesn't sound like that's the entire story.

I need to know if they have broke any laws by doing so. I don't care if it's a judge. I can't be advocating for the trump administration follow rule of law and at the same time advocating anyone democrat leaning bending the rules to their liking. At no point has any one I consider a legal authority laid our the federal governemnts case and the judges case.

I may very well be on OPs side but what I see is a lot of dust getting kicked up and that usually means the trump propaganda machine is ramping up. It's looks like bait to me and it's probably a case the federal government will easily win in the court of public opinion so I'm not going to stick my neck out when it means my credibility is on the line when discussing other, more pressing, matters like Abrego Garcia.

Funding opponents of incumbents you don't like is tantamount to picking winners.

It's fine to do it but not from the position he is in.

I'm not saying any of your points aren't salient but I saw this story and thought nothing of it, at first. Take it for what it is, the details aren't entirely clear to me, yet. I'm not going to be like the GOP and follow marching orders just because I read a comment online.

Edit:

I expected the down votes and it's really sad you won't even hear me out.

Edit2:

How's does it feel to be a victim of media narrative? Just letting them jerk your chain because you have no chill?