this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
1137 points (99.3% liked)

Uplifting News

14955 readers
1289 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't get why a such law took so long, but late is better than never.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wow, MISSOURI did that???

MISSOURI??!??

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm thinking the tipping point has been reached, the pendulum is now moving away from conservatism, and we'll see little upsets like this as rural states begin to shift back. Missouri is facing a hell of a medicaid cut which they can't afford, that may ripple for a while.

Unfortunately they have short memory spans but eventually they'll flip for a generation, like the New Deal era. People will just give up on MAGA and go the other way.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

No they wont. They'll continue to blame others and refuse to accept responsibility. There will be no pendulum swing because they will keep reinforcing themselves through radical fascist media expansion.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'll be deep in the cold, cold ground before I recognize Missouri.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Republican men are probably throwing a fit that they won’t be able to legally groom and rape children for “family values” anymore

[–] sasquatch7704@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is a new article from 1800, right? right?

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Abolish Marriage.

We don’t need the state or religious authorities dictating our relationships.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Amen, brother.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Need to do something for stuff like inheritance and visitation rights that's currently coupled (pun intended) to marriage.

[–] Sirdubdee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

National Emergency Contact Database. Sign a piece of paper together to make each other emergency contacts in the eyes of the govt. have as many as you’d like!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StonerCowboy@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago

The year is 2025.......

And America is still this ass backwards.

Least some good news for once.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

About fucking time you backasswards rednecks

Bet Republicans are furious

[–] frozenpopsicle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago

Checked if this was an Onion type article. So glad it isn't.

[–] gaja@lemm.ee 87 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Rep. Hardy Billington, R-Poplar Bluff, was among the few who spoke against the bill, arguing that barring pregnant teenagers from getting married would increase abortion rates.

“We all claim to be pro-life here in the body,” Billington said. “Now we’re going to vote on this bill where babies are going to die.”

Disgusting. What a pitiful excuse to enable the trafficking of children. I'm ashamed to live here. There's no fucking guarantee that it would even increase abortion rate, this guy is a closeted pedophile looking out for his ilk.

Apparently he's been spouting this bullshit for at least the past year. Not to mention he's also a homophobe.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Sounds like an old guy from the 50s, who still clings to 50s social mores and stigmas, unaware that being a single mother isn't the massive taboo he remembers it being.

Checks Hardy Billington's Wikipedia page

Born 1952 or 1953 (age 71–72)

Aaaaaand there we have it. Not sure why his exact birthdate isn't known. In fact the only notable thing on that page is about him expressing opposition to another child marriage bill that was proposed last year. Imagine having "strongly endorses child marriage" as the one and only legacy from your 70+ years of life. Gross.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, glad I married off my daughter at 14 last year. Knew that was a good decision

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My other wives are very happy with their new sister-wife, thank you for your spawn. The dowry is in the mail.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 days ago

Still allowed in a lot of US states

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Old enough to marry but too young to divorce. That's the stupidest thing I've heard this week.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Watch the Republicans set their hair on fire in response while introducing legislation to allow more child workers as well.

The party of family values.

Most US states allow it with parental consent.

In theory it's a holdover from times when age based consent was crazy liberal ideology, which for most of the red states means like 1990.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 86 points 3 days ago (5 children)

And if it fails, you know whoever voted for it to not pass is a child predator. Hopefully there's a list of people who voted "no" on it that gets leaked so people, especially parents, know who to cut contact with.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 61 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean, basically every Republican legislature or executive is a child predator. It's like a prerequisite to join the party. Their ratings don't drop when they're exposed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] donuts@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago

Hopefully there's a list of people who voted "no" on it that gets leaked

There is no need for leaks, it's right in the article:

The final version of the bill passed the House by a vote of 129-14, with one member voting present. In the Senate, it passed by a vote of 32-1. Sen. Mike Moon, R-Ash Grove, was the only vote against.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago (10 children)

The next time someone makes fun of shithole countries remind them that hundreds of 12yo are married in the US every year. And I guess their little bodies are ready for motherhood because many of them produce a baby in 4 or 6 mo after the wedding.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] nerv@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 days ago

Where is the loop hole? Emancipation?

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 45 points 3 days ago (4 children)

"in a move that infuriates conservatives..."

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 21 points 3 days ago (9 children)

You mean they hadn't already?!

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I mean... this is reason to celebrate, but at the same time it's like saying you're giving up on blinding orphan puppies. You were doing what?

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Two questions:

  1. What was the age before?

  2. What's the lowest age permitted in all the States?

[–] Patch@feddit.uk 15 points 2 days ago

It was 16 but only with parental consent and only with a marriage partner 21 or younger.

16 with parental consent is quite common. Mississippi I think is 15. Some allow marriage younger than this (some have effectively no minimum age), but with the requirement for consent to also be sought through the courts.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In many it used to be something like with parental permission. Basically child trafficking enshrined in law.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Human trafficking was the foundation of our great nation. Hell, there's still a lively Mail Order Bride market out of the States.

We can't stop. We won't stop.

I'll be curious to see if this law survives contact with the courts. Perhaps we'll even see destination weddings happening on the other side of the Arkansas border.

[–] StepUp2DaStreets@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Dammit man, this hits close to home. I'm from Missouri and we used to talk shit on Arkansans all the time. Now I've lived in Arkansas for over a decade and can confirm... there are some sketchy parts. Lol, I need to escape.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Well, you can always come down and hang with me in Texas. nervous laughter

scrambling to hide from the Abbott gestapo patrol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is PROOF that America is On the DECLINE! We NEED MORE God in School's to REVERSE this COMMUNIST FILTH of OUTLAWING MARRYING CHILDREN! First THIS then what? We CANT have SEX with them?

-School Shooting Advocates AKA Conservatives!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›