34
FDA and RFK Jr. aim to remove ingestible fluoride products used to protect kids’ teeth
(www.denverpost.com)
Right. Because everyone can afford a dentist.
this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
34 points (97.2% liked)
Denver Post Comment Section
380 readers
10 users here now
A place for ex-pats from the Denver Post comment section (closing down in July), as well as people that want to discuss Denver Post articles in general.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Want to now why?
They believe fluoride builds up around "the third eye" (the pineal gland), preventing you from... Idk, something. But clearly it's not good to cover your third eye!
You shouldn't ingest too much fluoride, but you should use it for your teeth. Just don't swallow the paste.
No one needs teeth anyway /S
They're just luxury bones!
Luxury bones for smiling only.
Imagine if you cut off your middle finger in a factory accident, and the doctor would refuse to sew it back unless you pay large amount of money for it. When refusing to pay they'd say your middle finger is only for flipping of other people, and maybe you just flipped off someone already having a bad day, so you pretty much deserved it, and otherwise if it was done for cheap you wouldn't follow standard workplace safety measures. And finally, you'll get a cheaper "alternative" in the form of a non-functioning fake finger.
While allowing higher level of lead and other metals. Fun.