this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
127 points (99.2% liked)

AnarchyChess

5770 readers
5 users here now

Holy hell

Other chess communities:
!Chess@lemmy.ml
!chessbeginners@sh.itjust.works

Matrix space

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wutchilli@feddit.org 30 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Is this a French opening ?

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 14 points 2 months ago

That is the French finale

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 5 points 2 months ago

I dunno the resulting balls are a bit too heavy for tennis.

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 4 points 2 months ago

I always thought the French opening was the Trou-de-cul.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In two moves? I mean, ok, I guess, but I'd prefer to be taken out to dinner first at least.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago

Too many rooks on the dance floor.

[–] Godnroc@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

First we got rid of the king and queen, then the knights had no one to serve, the bishops lost there power over the populace, and then all that remained was the pawns and a bunch of empty castles.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Turned out the castles, or burges, are not that empty and don't need a king to serve.

[–] owl@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Would is not make even more sense of the board was flipped? The pawn on g1 technically can be taken by the king.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago

Is that the royal en passant? In which the king is allowed to move two spaces (and through check)?

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

ah yes, the French Sweet 16