this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
141 points (99.3% liked)

Fuck AI

3065 readers
964 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ilixtze@lemm.ee 36 points 1 day ago

it hallucinates with easy problems as well.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’ll just copy / pasta my comment from a different AI article from earlier today:

It’s about time that we call the hype machine what it is. Ed Zitron has been calling this out for more than a year in his newsletter and on his podcast. These charlatans pretend we’re on the edge of thinking machines. Bullshit. They are statistical word generators. Can they be made to be useful beyond that? It appears so[0], but useful other things are not available to be mass-adopted so far. Curing cancer certainly doesn’t appear to be near.

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, advanced AI is more accurate than humans at identifying the things it's specialized in and it's an invaluable tool in many domains. LLMs, on the other hand, are not made to be accurate in anything in particular, and anyone expecting them to be just doesn't understand how they work.

[–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 3 points 15 hours ago

Well, then just call it what it is, linear regression.

[–] backgroundcow@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

It is fully possible, quite likely even, for models to both be "more accurate than humans" on average while at the same time suffer occasional "accuracy collapses".

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago

"Study finds"

How about "Anyone who knows anything about anything and actually tried to get an LLM to do anything with any level of complexity"?