this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
380 points (99.7% liked)

politics

24106 readers
4370 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The California governor said the troops had been left without food or water in federal buildings

Hundreds of National Guard troops deployed to Los Angeles under Donald Trump's orders are reportedly idle and without clear directives, California Gov. Gavin Newsom revealed, calling the situation a political stunt.

The controversy stems from Trump's decision to send 2,000 Guard troops to Los Angeles over the weekend in response to protests against aggressive ICE operations. On Monday, Newsom said he was informed another 2,000 were en route, even though most of the first wave had not been mobilized.

Only about 300 have been actively deployed, while the rest remained in federal buildings "without orders," according to Newsom. The governor said the troops had been left without food or water, and accused the White House of misusing military resources to bolster Trump's image.

top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 109 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Does any one know where they are being warehoused?

Seems like an opportunity for a geofenced, highly targeted ad campaign., informing service members that they have the right and obligation to resist illegal orders.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 55 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also to have food and water outside for anyone inside who wants to defect.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Free donuts if you promise to not violate the USMJ/ Geneva Conventions (pinky swear required)

Additional ice cream if you reaffirm the oath you took to protect the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 13 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Nothing illegal about sitting around and doing nothing... or riot defense against a building though... Which is the only things I've seen thus far.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

No but its an opportunity to maybe reach some service members and change some hearts and minds.

I mean, I literally started watching Democracy Now! when I was enlisted because I could download it as an MP3 before going underway.

You might be surprised how effective trying to change people can be.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's not relevant. Service members have the right and obligation to resist illegal orders, and they should be reminded of that before those illegal orders are handed down.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm not in the military but I know many service members, I'd be shocked if their commanding officers didn't give them warnings about illegal actions.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 2 days ago

COs need to hear it, too, since they've got the responsibility not to pass those illegal orders down to the boots.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's drilled into our heads over and over in training. Everyone knows it's their duty to refuse illegal orders and there's absolutely no defense for not doing so.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

That was the point I was trying to make.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Using this as an opportunity to re-promote this, but I helped organize this panel back last December because I knew this was coming:

https://youtu.be/HsrwIJcxYWY?t=438

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Their federal mobilization was the illegal act.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Except that they have been illegally deployed.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's not up to the Joe.

And no they haven't. They're under northcom. Northcoms primary duty/role is to respond to these events. My unit was trained for a rotation under for this exact duty back in 2010.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Respond to these events when the governor orders them to. The governor has not ordered them to deploy.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

https://www.justsecurity.org/92568/federalizing-national-guard-domestic-use-military/

There is a long and storied history of federalizing the National Guard.

And there are laws in place to allow it.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/12406

(2) there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States; or

But once again... This is not up to the Joe (the rank and file member of the military) to discern.

Edit: No offense to anyone... but it's clear that none of you have served in any military capacity. Nor have any meaningful knowledge of how any of it works.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There have been reports of them shooting protesters.

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 6 points 2 days ago

That was mostly the LAPD. been watching the livestreams all weekend and NG haven’t done shit besides stand around a fed building.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I read somewhere that they're mostly hanging out around federal buildings.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Got time to lean, got time to ~~clean~~ cruise ticktok and become exposed to furry propaganda.

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 43 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This little stunt cost $134 million dollars.

https://discuss.online/post/21624159

Come on TACO Don. Pump those fees up for making us pay $4 for eggs.

[–] bieren@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Don’t forget the millions for the penis parade. These two events alone are wasting 200 million. Be sure to call your rep and let them know you found negligent government spending.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

And they didn’t even get fed!

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

The good news is all the National Guard members will lose some Medicaid care to cover it. So. It works out.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is this state's rights, small government or fiscal responsibility?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I thought it was killing kings.

Whatever, there's gonna be tacos, right?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So if nobody else is in charge of them, Newsom should take command and order them to go back home.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Order them to protect the protestors from the police. Use their crowd control to keep the cops from using tear gas and rubber bullets on peaceful protestors and reporters.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

"Shield the protestors from the law."

[–] match@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago

Order them to work on wildfire and climate preparedness

[–] Robotsandstuff@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

Hi all, I hope people hear this and the post is not hidden. This is an insecure system, and talking on here about things you want to or will do will be used by the regime.

Please take this as it is meant. I fully appreciate the anger and the pain you are all feeling, and you are totally right to fight, but you must fight smart.

DO NOT LET YOUR ANGER GET THE BEST OF YOU. If this goes the way it's looking like it might, direct fights with whatfever is left of the States' forces is suicide, and the good guys need all the boots on the ground you can muster.

There are many veterans of the war on terror who are literal experts on the tactics needed to win this; seek them out.

Assume all coms are monitored because they are. Look after each other, people.

A friend who knows the score.

[–] AugustWest@lemm.ee 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So...

Time to set up a couple of food trucks, and get some people to talk civics and constitution. Meet some people, make some friends, take the opportunity NOW.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

TACO trucks, even

[–] manxu@piefed.social 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trump got what he wanted. You can be certain that right-wing media will spin this as, "the only reason the troops were idle is that the President's quick action quelled the protests."

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago

Well Trump or Fox's take on the result doesn't matter to me because Trump's going to lie and spin things no matter what happens...

  • Protests stay about the same or increase in intensity: Bringing in the Guard was the right call, look at how this is getting out of control!
  • Protests get less intense: Bringing in the Guard fixed the problem!

The narrative to counter that is that the Guard didn't actually do anything except inflame tensions.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 13 points 2 days ago

I hope this informs their decision whether or not to follow illegal, inhuman orders.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 11 points 2 days ago

Interesting how he sent our troops to a fake 'war' with no real plans or preparedness. Just. Like. Putin.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

...something tells me we don't want them to have orders.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So - just wander around in fatigues? Do a little shopping maybe. Start a pickup game?

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 6 points 2 days ago

Anything that's not "shoot protesters".

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Clownshow country.