this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
170 points (98.9% liked)

World News

47473 readers
2470 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And one man walked away from that. The mind boggles.

[–] O_R_I_O_N@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

No fucking way. IRL plot armour

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

More like staggered, but yes.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 27 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Looks like it stalled due to lack of thrust. What could have killed both engines right after takeoff?

[–] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's always hard to judge AoA unless you're looking side-on with a horizon for reference, but excessive nose-up attitude caused by cargo incorrectly loaded or not secured properly so it shifted aft during rotation could have caused an aerodynamic stall.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz -1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It’s a passenger plane. I don’t think 200 people slid to the back of the plane after rotation.

[–] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago

While I am a bit of a misanthrope, I do stop short of referring to people as cargo.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Maybe the high-lift devices malfunctioned?

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

I was just thinking about this, perhaps when the aircraft rotated, water or other contaminants got drawn into the fuel system?

Or shifting cargo damaged the fuel lines?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago (11 children)

It seems to climb OK for a little while then suddenly start sinking. There's no sign of an obvious engine problem. Not sure whether we'd be able to see any sign of a bird strike from this far away.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] philpo@feddit.org 10 points 2 days ago (16 children)

Yeah, it's rather strange. There is another one from a perspective where the aircraft almost "overflew" the cameraman (basically at a 5'o clock angle)- it shows them having aileron and elevator control right until they crash. And while the quality is poor, I am somewhat convinced that the RAT has not deployed (yet?)

A bird strike would likely have caused something visible So it doesn't sound like hydraulics or fuel(water in the fueltanks?) or something electronic wise with the engine control. Strange and sad.

load more comments (16 replies)

For multi engine planes it's pretty rare, most likely a fuel system failure, or less likely pilot throttling error. My money would be on something with the fuel system.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] JRaccoon@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 2 days ago (7 children)

One theory circulating online is that the pilots may have accidentally retracted the flaps instead of the landing gear. Apparently that would result in kind of a flight path seen on the published videos.

While this cannot be confirmed or ruled out with the information we have, in my opinion the available videos seem to kinda support this theory. Initially the aircraft appears to take off and climb normally, but for some reason the gear is not being retracted when usually it would be retracted right after the takeoff.

Naturally the gear could be forgotten or left intentionally down if there were a dual engine failure right after takeoff, for example, but as the videos show no evidence of this, I'm more inclined to believe in simple pilot error.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm not an expert, but pretty much every plane crash expert on the planet is watching the same footage and saying they don't know what's happened.

It's absurd to suggest the pilots accidentally retracted the flaps and no one figured that out yet.

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Damn, did I miss the plane crash expert unison chant again?

[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's less that you missed it and more that they chose not to invite you

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is what you get for questioning The Consensus

[–] JRaccoon@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I don't get what you mean by "and no one figured that out yet." As you said yourself, no one knows what happened yet. Pretty much all we have at this point are the videos, and all we can confirm from them is a rough flight path of the plane and that the landing gear remained down after what appeared to be a normal takeoff. I haven't seen any footage that clearly shows the state of the flaps with any certainty, but please correct me if I've missed something.

In my mind, that leaves us with three possible scenarios:

  • Pilot error (retracting the flaps instead of the landing gear)
  • Dual engine failure at the critical moment (there's no evidence of this in the videos, but also nothing ruling it out)
  • Something else (we don't know what we don't know)

From the two scenarios (pilot error, engine failure) that fit the flight path from the videos, the option one seems more plausible to me. But that’s just my armchair opinion, it doesn't mean anything. All we can really do is wait for the investigation and the preliminary report.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I did see one person commenting on the other video that they could see the flaps were in the wrong position. And it is conspicuous that the landing gear was not retracted - though could that be because the pilots realized they were in trouble and would need to attempt a crash landing, or were too busy with whatever else had gone wrong?

Are the 787's controls arranged in such a way that you could accidentally retract the flaps instead of the landing gear?

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

I think the simplest explanation, and the most likely one, is the pilots were too busy dealing with whatever shit was hitting the fan to raise the landing gear.

And, in my view, that's a loss of engine power for whatever reason, possibly bad fuel.

[–] torrentialgrain@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The plane was in takeoff config: https://imgur.com/a/JzS3ro9

According to type rated pilots the 787 doesn’t allow you to retract flaps immediately in critical flight after takeoff.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JRaccoon@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Are the 787's controls arranged in such a way that you could accidentally retract the flaps instead of the landing gear?

Not in a sense that someone could just grab the wrong lever in the dark for example. The levers are in different parts of the cockpit and also shaped very differently. But we humans can do all kinds of weird mistakes that are hard to explain. Almost everyone has experienced this sometimes. Think something like searching for you phone while it's in your hand. Afterwards it's very hard to explain why would anyone do such a silly mistake but it still happened. This would be similar.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›