this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
56 points (96.7% liked)

Linux

7897 readers
332 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

OC by @merci3@lemmy.world

Single core, 32 bit CPU, can't even do video playback on VLC. But it kinda works for some offline work, like text editing, and even emulation through zsnes! It's crazy how Linux keeps old hardware like this running.

Thankfully though, this laptop CPU is upgradable, and so is the ram, so I'm planning on revitalizing and bringing this old Itautec to the 21st century πŸ˜„

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Shareni@programming.dev 1 points 4 minutes ago

Have you tried antix? It's basically Debian for old computers.

Very weird it can't play videos at all. I installed Linux on a friend's old <1gb ram laptop and it's even able to play 480p YouTube.

Also, I wouldn't run xfce on it, it's barely lighter than KDE.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 1 hour ago

I was trying to think of the oldest hardware I have run modern Linux on (probably an old Pentium II) when I remembered that I used to run SLS on a 486 (33 MHz, 4 MB of RAM).

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 2 points 5 hours ago

The lowest end hardware you ever ran Linux on, so far!

If you have enough resources for a GUI there’s too much bloat.

[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 12 hours ago

Intel 486sx at whooping 33MHz, 4Mb RAM, 650 Mb HDD. Was some Red Hat flavor and took a couple of minutes to launch Netscape Navigator.

[–] orionsbelt@midwest.social 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Are those odd choices? My knowledge of emulators is more outdated than OP's hardware.

[–] orionsbelt@midwest.social 3 points 11 hours ago

hahaha, hilarious comment :D

nah, not odd at all! it was one of the first things i noticed before i got down to the hardware specs, so it got my attention.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 41 minutes ago) (1 children)

Probably the slowest I've used was a 25 MHz(?) sparcstation 1, 500 MB drive, 16 MB RAM. Or some 90's arm box. Netwinder? iPAQ?

It's kind of terrible how huge even tiny distributions are these days. But these days there's cheap low power draw hardware and big storage available that works great and that's nice. I don't miss the bad old times.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago

Mine was a SPARCclassic. I had two of them, one ran OpenBSD as the gateway and I put early Gentoo on the other one. It took days to build initially.