this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
221 points (99.6% liked)

News

30260 readers
4977 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A resolution by Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia would require congressional approval before U.S. troops could engage in hostilities against Iran. He said Americans don’t want another “forever war.”

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue@lemmy.world 17 points 17 hours ago

This is supposed to be the default!

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 18 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

A resolution Mr. Kaine introduced Monday would require explicit congressional authorization or a formal declaration of war before U.S. forces could take direct action against Iran. It faces long odds on Capitol Hill given Republicans’ reluctance to challenge Mr. Trump’s power, but it could prompt a vibrant debate as lawmakers in both parties warn against involving the United States in the escalating conflict.

The measure is a direct invocation of the War Powers Resolution, a 1973 federal law intended to be a check on the president’s power to enter an armed conflict without the consent of Congress. While it would still allow Mr. Trump to authorize military action in self-defense in the event of an imminent attack, it would compel him to seek approval before carrying out any offensive operations against Iran.

So that video claiming to be from anonymous, saying they have have knowledge a false flag attack will be used as an excuse to go to war...

Not saying that is actually anonymous or that they actually have any evidence, but also not sure how much evidence you really need to make a fairly accurate guess as to what the writing on the wall will be.

On the one hand needing congressional approval might not even matter bc Republicans have done just about everything asked of them up to this point. However, it does seem like we may be seeing some Republicans questioning if being loyalists will really help them retain their power when the midterms roll around.

If something were to happen like what anonymous/whoever is posing as anonymous is claiming, it could quickly swing in the other direction. Everybody was antiwar by the time Bush finally left office, but nobody wanted to be accused of not being a patriot in 2001.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 7 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Like a false flag attack on US soil or base?

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 7 points 17 hours ago

Or sinking an aircraft carrier off the coast of Yemen. They've been practising by dropping some planes overboard first.

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

They are claiming us soil, but there is no indication the person in the video is credible. https://lemm.ee/post/66966221

Then again who the fuck knows what's going on anymore.. https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/1ld959k/the_amount_of_people_trying_to_evacuate_tehran/

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 12 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

A resolution by Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia would require congressional approval before U.S. troops could engage in hostilities against Iran.

Isn't that literally already the law?

[–] feannag@sh.itjust.works 9 points 16 hours ago

Sorta. Congress has the power to declare war, but the President has the power to direct the military in war and in "peace". The War Powers Act was supposed to constrain that power, which limits military action without Congressional Approval to 60 days (plus 30 for withdrawal). But no President has acknowledged that that law is constitutional. Plus 90 days is a long time in modern warfare.

[–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 17 hours ago

Only legally

[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I would like to see him in a padded cell but I guess we have to start somewhere.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Take the pads out and we've got something. Put him in that cliffside jail cell Tyrion got put in on game of thrones. If he gets to the level of hopelessness that he jumps, I'll call it good. I just don't think he has that level of awareness to understand... Almost anything really, but specifically that things aren't just going to somehow work out for him like he's some kind of fat, evil Sterling Archer.

[–] rumimevlevi 4 points 19 hours ago

Basically he want everybody to be involved in when and how to fight Iran

[–] graycube@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago