this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
640 points (93.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

35397 readers
1114 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For all their "christianity", republicans in the US are pretty hypocritical.

Jesus actually teached that everybody deserves to get fed and housed. That everybody deserves healthcare. That people should care for other people in their community. That is essentially the core principles of socialism.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 30 minutes ago

Socialism is an economic and political philosophy encompassing diverse economic and social systems characterised by social ownership of the means of production, as opposed to private ownership.

Socialist Jesus is

  • anachronistic (property+ownership, private vs social don't make much sense 2 kya),
  • incongruent with most of Christianity and Socialism,
  • propaganda.

bad look for socialism honestly

[–] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago

No no no. I see where you went wrong, you were thinking about Jesus from the bible, people dont really believe in him anymore. The Jesus followed today is Supply-Side Jesus, I know it gets confusing since they are both named Jesus.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

And then Jesus said:

"Thou hast nothing to lose but thy chains! Take all the tools from those that dare to enslave thee and build thy own communities where all of you equally decide what to do!"

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 hour ago

Lot of people during history fought for socialism but they always ignore that part somehow.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago

Teached -> taught

The problem was that the church needed to reach out to the nobles to spread, so promising wealth became a sticking point

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago

One of Marx’s biggest inspirations was the teachings of Jesus.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 45 points 9 hours ago

And Jesus did reach down to the leper, but the leper was not cured, because his monthly deductables did not cover it.

"Get a job, hippy", proclaimed Peter.

[–] p3n@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

The early Church is recorded as living that way:

"44 And all that believed were together, and had all things common; 45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need. 46 ¶And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart, " ( Acts 2:44-46 KJV).

However, tearing a political philosophy away from its associated worldview leads to trouble.

This is one of the things I find strange about the political parties in the U.S. the Republican party, which seems to claim the majority of members who claim to be Christians, largely espouse a capitalist economic system. Capitalism is much more congruent with a Darwinist world view than a Christian one.

Meanwhile, the Democrat party, at least the more progressive wing, espouse more of a socialist system but seemingly oppose Christianity and claim a world view more congruent with a capitalist system.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

seemingly oppose Christianity

Christianity doesn't even believe in Christianity. Behind the scenes in Churches, it's bitter old people, angry at each other, shaking down patrons for cash, and selling peace to grieving people. Most Democrats want universal healthcare. They want, but are afraid of UBI, and would like it if they could keep their current advantage in the playing field, not becoming poorer while spreading change.

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

Yeah that’s interesting. Though I do think the Bible is big enough and vague enough for either tribe to exploit. I’m convinced the Left could have sided with Jesus’s ways of life and been the Christian nation, while the right rejected it.

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

From a theological point of view, Jesus was indeed a socialist. However, he wasn't a socialist in a Marxist sense, he was a different kind of socialist. Christian socialism actually has a very interesting history that goes back quite back in time.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago

Exactly. There is a rich tradition of Christian socialism and Christian communism. Even the communist group that Marx and Engels joined up with practiced christian communism and utopian socialism before moving away to a more secular and materialist version. The Communist Manifesto marks this turning point well.

Of course, M&E argue that Christianity is a tool used to blunt the edge of revolutionary socialism and keep it back in line where it can't do any harm. Like the other forms of socialism (including that dreaded one) that are explicitly designed to recuperate the more radical ideas to a place where they can be more comfortably controlled by the ruling class.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 14 points 15 hours ago (6 children)

Jesus was middle eastern. Don't need to look further than that to find the hypocrisy.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›