Almost sounds as if in order to steal intellectual property, they had to go down the "traditional" route of talking to someone, making promises etc. If it turns out that a chatbot isn't the best tool for plagiarizing something, what is it even good for?
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
13 points (100.0% liked)
TechTakes
1987 readers
48 users here now
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Old McDonald had a startup, iyo io o[4-mini].
It's funny how just today in a completely unrelated context a generative ai enthusiast used an example of OpenAI getting sued by NYT as a reason why they wouldn't commit some other malfeasance because they'd get caught if they did.
@dgerard this reminded me that the Rabbit R1 exists and... they're still selling them WTF? https://www.amazon.co.uk/rabbit-Voice-Activated-Assistant-Device-Transcription/dp/B0DYK831XY
Pretty sure Altman is gonna get away with settling with Iyo. Hopefully they demand cold hard cash and not weird-ass OpenAI company scrip.