this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
201 points (92.8% liked)

Fuck AI

3309 readers
957 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A year after Elon bought Twitter there was a study done that found out roughly half of all Twitter users are fake.

Most reddit users are fake now.

The spam from AI bots are draining more electricity than cities, it is quickly becoming the majority of global power usage.

These datacenters need to be burned down.

[–] leftthegroup 3 points 1 day ago

With the owners inside, preferably.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No thanks. I model my speech after movie/TV show characters like a normal person.

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 5 points 1 day ago

Like Yosemite Sam and Foghorn Leghorn, hopefully

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 4 points 1 day ago

Why re invent the wheel when there ready made templates for any identy one would think of!

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

I'm pretty old, so I still speak Dan Rather / Tom Brokaw English (American?). Might have a touch of Walter Cronkite even, although I was pretty young when he retired. I have no skibidi toilet, but I like to misuse it in the hopes of killing it off with my uncoolness. I am definitely excited about the world going to Ohio in a handbasket.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

"You can totally trust things that sound like they're AI generated, that's just how people talk now! Trust us!"

Was this funded by ChatGPT?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I probably would be among the last to notice, as I have never used this.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I understand, and there is no need to feel out of place. It is perfectly fine to engage at your own pace. Should you choose to explore this further, I am here to provide any assistance you may need with utmost support and encouragement.

[–] Liberal_Ghost@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Comment of the day 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[–] fargeol@lemmy.world 133 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're totally correct! People really start talking like ChatGPT. Here's an explanation why...

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 63 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That is an excellent point, you're making. I would like to add that ...

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm so glad to have you both in this conversation. May i suggest ...

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're correct. As you know, I am still learning...

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago

Sure! How would you prefer I make it stop, or would you like to talk about something else?

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I was admittedly pulled in by the clickbait title but then saw that it's a Vice article and realized that reading this crap would be pointless as it will all be absolute bullshit.

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I think i've seen more people use "-" in emails and what have you more within the past year than ever before and it makes me wonder "did they use chatgpt to write this?"

or I've had project managers on jobs I'm consulting for use "final thoughts:" in docs/emails and I know for a fact they didn't write it. When you use AI pretty much daily for your job like I do you can spot people using it from a mile away. Blog posts, game/movie/book reviews, proposals, emails, etc everyone is using it. Hell you can spot it here on Lemmy and on Reddit very easily. it's harder to find actual real person written content these days then AI content.

and if they use EM Dashes? 100% it's AI.

[–] scott@lemmy.org 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

cries in using emdashes since years before LLMs existed

Edit: misspoke, AI doesn't exist

[–] Eyron@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I used dashes for decades. I've removed all of them all since ChatGPT became popular. It doesnt help that I think ChatGPT overuses them.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

and if they use EM Dashes? 100% it's AI.

Sorry to disappoint you, but I regularly use em dashes. (It's ALT+0151 on PC.)

Remember that the models do model on the writings of actual people. They're just regurgitating it really badly.

[–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Applications such as Exchange/Outlook turn a double dash to an em dash when you type it. I've used them for a couple decades.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Oh, that's kinda useful to know. Thanks.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Libre office always extends my - - - little dashes - - -

[–] SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

This isn't even ai in itself, it's roughly similar to the axios smart brevity format. So many business communications work like this today.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 59 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I haven't noticed this yet fortunately. Anyone?

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It's a Vice article so it's all bullshit anyhow.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 35 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Not really. There's a lot of Eastern Europe where the kids speak English they learned from YouTube, so they all have American accents and call people "bro." Speach patterns like ChatGPT would be too cheery to be taken seriously by anyone.

Like, in this world right now, are there people that respond to a question with a chirpy, "Certainly! Let's dive in to that!"

Doubt.

[–] octoshrimpy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Like, in this world right now, are there people that respond to a question with

Certainly! Let's dive into that:

As the ChatGPT platform has grown in userbase over the years, it can be assumed that younger foreign users would pick up on the language patterns — specially if they are communicating with the platform on a daily basis.

Much like the already-existing effect of children picking up on Youtuber's mannerisms and verbal styles over time, this brings up Nature vs Nurture1 methods of learning.

Would you like to explore more about how this comment was generated by a human with no LLM help, or tricks to make your own written text sound like you're fake?

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you truly didn't use LLM, kudos to you. You managed to switch my brain off in the first paragraph like only slop does. I had to force myself to read it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That first bit always feels so false and icky. Like, no I didn't open up chatGPT to have my butt licked every other sentence. I just need the syntax for X or Y, and no I'm not delving into interesting depths of typescript. I'm monkeypatching the code to make a certain thing work and probably leaving a trail of wanton destruction behind every step I go.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 22 points 2 days ago

Just the occasional garbage comment or message where someone has clearly just copied and pasted a direct LLM output.

I do feel like lately I have people more bluntly asking me for stuff though and getting frustrated respectfully respecifying what they want but that also started before covid. People just want answers they think should be readily available for a while now.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Got it, we need to rename Gen Alpha to Gen NPC.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

fr fr thats no cap bussin

... or something like that

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What was that sonny? Yer speakin inteh m'bad ear.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

/* holds up video of skibidi toilet */

/* does the fortnite floss dance */

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Hey grandpa, is your bussy bussin' or bustin'?

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There's so very much in that paper that doesn't seem to suggest what they are saying it does. It suggests people are directly using those tools to create scripts for academic videos instead of their fundamental speech changing. They state that they manually reviewed for "reading vs spontaneous" and found about 30 percent were directly reading a script, but extrapolating the non "reading" samples to not have used AI copy edited outlines in this context is a leap. It would make more sense that they did. These lecture videos were not examples of natural language use in any sense.

Our study is focused on academic communication, yet we anticipate that similar patterns may extend to other communicative contexts.

Seems particularly unfounded (though it really has enough hedges to make it a non statement "similar" "may" with no reference to what context they're thinking of). It's also a preprint that gets most of its models from preprints.

Then the vice article takes every weakness of the paper and actually amplifies them to a really profound degree. We've got researchers trying to push an AI is transformative narrative and a journalist trying to push an AI makes you stupid narrative right off a cliff into "popsci journalists reporting on preprints make stupid claims" pit.

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Literally don't talk to enough people to notice. 🤷🏿‍♀️

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 day ago

AI shills are coming for you... Dont you want a friend who lives in data center?!

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago
[–] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 days ago

Joke's on them, I already talked like that 😆

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's just a case of art imitating life imitating art imitating life imitating art imitating life. What's so hard to understand about that?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The words they studied were, delve, realm, meticulous and adept.

[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago

Which sucks, because those were words I used before ChatGPT came along.

load more comments
view more: next ›