Acknowledged governance topic opened by https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/u/fxomt
This is a non-voting post. Known users should leave comments with your thoughts on the subject.
A community for discussion and democratic decision making in the Divisions by zero.
Anyone with voting rights can open a governance thread and initiate a vote or a discussion. There's no special keywords you must be aware of before you open a thread, but there are some. here's the governance thread manual.
Acknowledged governance topic opened by https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/u/fxomt
This is a non-voting post. Known users should leave comments with your thoughts on the subject.
I mean, unless you're closing here I don't mind what you do. I think this is the best instance. I think the leadership is top notch.
I'm a happy guy
I think that, for most dbzer0 users (and quite a few landlubbers like me), being able to choose between a Lemmy and a PieFed instances is only positive. What you need to take into account is the additional work this incurs towards you guys, the admins; you'll be maintaining two instances instead of just one.
Maintaining the instance isn't too big of a problem, but thank you for your input!
I don't trust Piefed at all - they're far too eager to curate my experience, and they've reintroduced all of the reputation anti-features (plus more) that were part of what drove me away from Reddit and the absence of which is part of what I like about Lemmy and Mbin.
If you're contemplating a second instance, I don't much care, because I can simply not use it. If you're contemplating a move, I think it's an awful idea.
iirc Piefed started as a small personal project, so it was quite opinionated. Now that there's more users rimu has said he'll make it more neutral, and give more power to instance admins.
And yep, it's a second, separate instance
rimu has said he’ll make it more neutral
I'll believe it when I see it.
It's an odd thing - the Lemmy devs are notoriously opinionated and intolerant, and are constantly castigated for it, but I don't recall ever seeing even a single hint of their opinions or even their intolerance baked into the Lemmy software.
Piefed, meanwhile, is a direct reflection of the dev's biases right from the start, and with everything from the curated subscription lists to the karma and private voting, seems designed explicitly for the purpose of empowering bias.
Say what you will about Dessalines and Nutomic - at least they keep their biases to their own instance and out of the Lemmy software. And further, they appear to have gone to some lengths to make the software as neutral as possible - not only not reflecting any specific bias but limited in ways that make it difficult for it to even be used to impose bias.
And the same can NOT be said for Rimu and Piefed.
Perfectly put, .world is already turning into a new Reddit and Piefed is perfectly made to encourage turning into a new Reddit once all the .world'ers move there
That's exactly my concern. It's gotten too much exposure too quickly recently, so it doesn't feel organic, and between subscription gatekeeping, software level censorship snd the reputation anti-features, it just feels like it's been cynically designed specifically to undermine the benefits of the fediverse and turn it into another place where narratives can and will be shaped and controlled.
private voting
After having discussed with a few people, Rimu agreed to drop the private voting. The system will switch to two votes button
a local one that will stay local
a federated one that will be sent to other instances
https://chat.piefed.social/#narrow/channel/5-admins/topic/Private.20voting/near/332
This provides better transparency than Lemmy, as users are now complaining about tool like lemvotes: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/48233901/19876557
I don't know much about Piefed. What anti-features are you talking about?
It tracks karma, automatically collapses replies and hides threads based on downvote thresholds and attaches icons to usernames to tell other users in advance that they have been downvoted in the past. And alongside that, votes are hidden. So a few determined users (or even one determined user and a few bots) can easily silence other users or even effectively censor content just by mass downvoting.
Just like Reddit, and notably NOT like the rest of the threadiverse which has done away with karma, doesn't auto-hide downvoted users or content snd makes votes public.
I was hoping a dbzer0 piefed instance would happen sometimes in the future! I would totally use it, since it has some pretty cool features that Lemmy has been quite slow in implementing. For example, merged communities that cover one specific topic.
A comment I came across a while ago puts it quite well:
I haven't used piefed myself but I wouldn't want to switch to it because I feel like it gives more power to downvotes and karma (or "reputation" as they call it):
- Comments with -10 score are collapsed by default.
- People who get downvoted a lot end up with a ‘low reputation’ indicator next to their name. You’ll know it when you see it.
- Upvotes in meme communities do not add to reputation.
Those are three of the twelve points listed as differences to lemmy on their features page.
I also don't agree with some of the points in their article on "PieFed features for growing healthy communities".
from: https://sopuli.xyz/comment/17119490
the comments' thread is also quite interesting
Plus it's written in Python and has only 1,6k MAUs, so we can only guess how well it scales
Slightly edited from an older comment of mine:
EDIT: as such I believe that operating a Piefed instance would be a waste resources and actually harmful considering the fragmentation it would cause for little to no benefit at all (also it seems much better set up for a new Reddit with all the .world'ers flooding over there and the anti-features)
I think rimu has made the karma system to be optional (i.e. in the admin settings, not hardcoded) so we'd just disable it anyway. I think the second feature should only apply to mods/admins, since its a very useful tool. #1 #3 i agree, they are not good.
I'll address each point in the Piefed Features for growing healthy communities:
This applies to admins, and while not really that effective, its okay to have.
This is a very useful tool, since this is a big problem on lemmy. Same thing; only for admins
Sounds like a good idea; but with feature #3 as you pointed out, this might cause some new-user shitposters to get falsely flagged, but we would disable it anyway.
This is now opt-in, and we would disable it.
https://chat.piefed.social/#narrow/channel/5-admins/topic/Low.20reputation.20communities/near/1872
We would add nothing to communities, anyway; users are free to do whatever they want, themselves. (maybe to our own instance communities like /0 and governance? But not much honestly.
As i said before, probably should only be seen by admins/mods.
No problem here; most clients do this anyway.
Sounds very useful, and which is why piefed didn't struggle at all with nicole.
Good idea.
We have this on lemmy too
Not a good idea imo. We'd disable it.
Plus it's written in Python and has only 1,6k MAUs, so we can only guess how well it scales
We'll always have this lemmy instance anyway :) but afaik it scales fine, and has some optimizations coming along soon.
i like lemmy a lot. i also like that piefed seems to have better mod tools (at least i am told so). as one of the many people who lost their lemm.ee account to mod burnout, i think the important thing is what you like to work on.
if you can only support one plattform, choose the one you like better - i will most likely follow db0 for its governance.
if you can support both platforms and have fun doing so, i don't see a downside in it.
Thanks for your input! Don't worry, we'll keep both instances alive.
I think I'm for it, but I also don't know if I understand the implications. So, some questions:
Is there a downside?
Would this be in addition to lemmy or a replacement?
If it is in addition to, is that the permanent plan, would this be working toward an eventual switch-over?
I should probably try piefed a bit so I understand it a bit better, but it's just a different Lemmy basically, right? Does it federate with existing Lemmy?
If it doesn't federate with what we already have, I'd have to keep up with two things, and two is a big number, so I'd probably just pick one and stay there.
Anyway, exciting nonetheless. I'll go eat some pie now and see what that's all about.
Piefed federates with lemmy, it's basically a clone written in python instead of rust, with advanced moderator tools, and developed by people who aren't braindead Stalinists.
Thanks for the explanation!
I did some pierusing and liked what I saw, too.
Is there a downside?
Not really, i think. We have the resources, and being an admin isn't too time consuming; surely we can make time for an extra instance.
Would this be in addition to lemmy or a replacement?
Addition
If it is in addition to, is that the permanent plan, would this be working toward an eventual switch-over?
Probably not. There would be way too many potential issues and it's risky.
I should probably try piefed a bit so I understand it a bit better, but it's just a different Lemmy basically, right? Does it federate with existing Lemmy?
Yep. Try https://quokk.au/ (anarchist instance, too!) which is basically the closest thing we have right now
Some of my thoughts:
I value the community that we have and the style of communication that makes Lemmy different from other forum type software.
I very much dislike the political views of its creators.
I have an account on Piefed and while it's not terrible, it's still not as nice as here. I think it can get there over time.
I don't think it's a good idea, but i don't care so long as the lemmy instance stays open.
I think people's concerns over the politics of the developers are overblown and fragmenting into a new project weakens the fediverse - especially when I don't see anything wrong with the software that is being done differently in piefed.
I think people's concerns over the politics of the developers are overblown.
It seems a little unnatural because people are trying to hide their racism, xenophobia, western superiority mentality, but the developers also made a lot of political posts to frame them as CCP talking heads. They should have just used alt accounts like rest of the internet platform owners. Rookie mistake.
But, at least they're honest about what they are and not covertly creating a foss product by hiding some sinister motive to rugpull later, like bluesky.
If admins are okay with running both Lemmy and Piefed instances simultaneously then it seems fine IMO.
But otherwise don't feel strongly about it, I don't know that I'd actually use the Piefed instance unless something happens within the Lemmyverse side of things or issues with the dbzer0 Lemmy instance itself.
Against this idea as it merely causes significantly more work the instance maintainers with (imo) quite limited benefits. I'd only be in favour if lemmy began crashing and burning for whatever reason.
Here's my two cents:
Because there's no direct integration with Lemmy, and we start with an empty piefed instance. I'll have to create a user and all that, and I "just" quit Reddit so it's not very appealing to me, even if piefed has better features.
I would create an account if everyone migrates, or if I can click a "move to piefed" button that copies all my comments and posts.
I dont really care, but I won't be using piefed. the default UI doesn't allow me to adjust the size of thumbnails as i see fit: tiny and on the left. that's a deal breaker for me, even if it's petty.
I do not like new reddit and i have never liked new reddit and i have tried new reddit and will not be using new reddit. piefed UI is a new reddit ripoff.
or i guess a lot of social media platforms do that layout, Twitter FB insta. thankfully i dont waste my time with that shit either. I waste my time with YOU nerds and I am happy with that
Piefed has a custom CSS section in the settings that allows you to resize the thumbnails as you see fit
Why would you go through the pain of maintaining another service? What is the actual benefit for you as an instance manager, but also for the user?
I’d rather have few very good maintained services, than the opposite.
From my admin POV, lemmy lacks in a lot of ways that just makes it harder for me to get stuff done.
From my user POV, lemmy lacks features like flairs/tags, actually working blocking, feeds, etc.
It's not too much of a pain, since dbzer0 doesn't take much work to keep running.
I think this may be a good idea. The questionable performance/behavior of the core Lemmy devs does not give me confidence for the long term prospects of Lemmy as a code base and service.
piefed seems to be growing rapidly while Lemmy has stagnated. There's obviously a reason for that.
Yes, I'm all for it (assuming it wouldn't create too much work for you guys). Not supporting the Lemmy devs is a great idea. Heck, I would have moved completely to one of my piefed accounts if it wasn't for not wanting to abandon this account on db0.
Out of curiosity, would it ever be possible to migrate everyone here over to a piefed instance, allowing you to shut down the Lemmy instance? I'm not suggesting doing that (well, maybe lust a little), but more interested in the technical nature.
It is possible, but piefed isn't 100% backwards compatible with lemmy, so stuff like custom-emojis (we don't use them much, but threativore relies on it) wouldn't be imported, since piefed doesn't support it.
And piefed/lemmy use different encryption, so each user would have to reset their password.
Absolutely! The sooner we have the option to be free of the issues with Lemmy development (or not to the point, developers) the better.
I really hate fragmentation. Linux suffers heavily from it. It creates redundant work. I think duplicate projects are curse on the open source so thats why I am not in favor of that.
I agree but at the same time Lemmy devs are problematic to say the least and nothing bad has been uncovered about piefed so far.
I don't know a ton about piefed , but wouldn't that be more likely to divide the community?
No, it's compatible with Lemmy. There are some differences, but they are relatively minor.
Lemmy users can partake in Piefed instances/communities and vice versa.
Growing is usually good. Do the expanded tools to the admins warrant the additional headache?
Sometimes being small and having your own dark little corner of the internet where the “normies” don’t hang out is OK too.
A lot of forums started with a barrier of entry that required a small bit of tech savvy to get there. Not that picking an instance to get on the fediverse is that hard, but if it’s keeping someone at bay, that might be preferable.
We don't have interest in being mainstream, we like dbzer0 how it is. It's mainly about the faster development/extra features, and shouldn't be a problem to manage
Yes please! I've already joined piefed.ca to be able to support a platform without sponsoring communist propaganda, but they seem to have issues federating content properly, it takes over 24h to see new posts from Lemmy, and many discussions will be over at that point.
This very post for example is not visible there at all.
Would hope that with more instances we'd also get to see content sooner.