this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
267 points (95.9% liked)

196

18027 readers
636 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How much crap are you watching if you have to speed it up to get through it all?

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

The dopamine must flow!

[–] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

I can kind of understand the people who speed up audiobooks and podcasts. But movies? That's nuts. |

I wonder if OP was alive during the VCR era. I bet they would have loved the FF button. AKA chipmunk mode.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I hate watching anything faster than normal. I want bad things to happen to this person.

[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

do you want bad things to happen to OOP at 1.5x speed?

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 10 points 1 day ago

No, more like 0.5x speed so we can savour it

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 7 points 1 day ago
[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

this user, right here, what?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

this person needs to beblocked into the Clockwork Orange device

[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world 185 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Why waste time like this? Wouldn't it be better if cinemas would use vertical screens where a popular youtuber would describe the plot of the movie in like 30 seconds while talking at 2x speed?

[–] Quokka@quokk.au 66 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Or they could put subway surfers on the bottom half of the screen.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

What is a subway surfer

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

And you can pay extra for a chinese voice counting numbers as back noise.

[–] Luccus@feddit.org 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

*an AI describes part of a scene in a movie, badly.

And the title is something like “HE USES SUPERPOWERS TO SAVE HIS FRIEND #MOVIE #FILM #CINEMA #SHORTS”. Also, the name of the channel is any two word combination of: movie, cinema, star, summary, domain or reels. And each upload is either 15 to 25 minutes or a short and the channel uploads something every day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 77 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why waste time watching an entire movie when you can just read the spoilers and know what's it about in less than 5 minutes?

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Absolutely not me watching cinemasins as a substitute to watching the whole movie.

[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 101 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Look, I am the type who watches lectures at 1.25x or 1.5x speed or something. But movies? It'd ruin the pacing. If you can't bring up the attention to watch a movie then maybe you just shouldn't

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What if we invented drugs that allow you to enjoy any content 1.5 times faster?

[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago

Maybe that'd just make the content 1.5 times longer and 1.5 times more expensive

[–] istdaslol@feddit.org 146 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And also add a subway surfer with family guy funny Momentes for the ultimate goldfish experience

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 50 points 2 days ago (3 children)

And a live comment section. Or even synced commentary streams by YouTubers you can view on your phone via their Wi-Fi? You're paying to see the movie anyway, so they won't be limited by fair use.

[–] RandomTester@lemmybefree.net 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I kinda want this (live comment section)

am I okay?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Does this person not pay for their ticket? It costs 15$ for a ticket at our theater. Why would I want to waste that money by having it sped up? It's hard enough finding movies that are worth watching in the first place.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The industrial revolution and it's consequences....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rollerbang@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

For obvious reasons this will never happen. That being said, I do the same with most content. When YouTube I use from 1.25 as an absolute minimum to 2.0 a lot of the time. Average being 1.5. For movies/series I tend to opt for 1.25-1.33.

But this all fails when any music is involved - then I dial it down to 1.0.

[–] phantomwise@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 days ago (9 children)

If you look at old silent movies, they were played at different speeds in different cinemas and projections. There wasn't a standard way to play a movie, no "you NEED to play the movie at this specific speed or it will be ruined". I'm not saying the same should apply to modern movies, but I find it interesting.

[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

That is not true. There was a standard, which is different from todays standard. Which is why it looks funny being played at todays standard, but mostly they get digitally fixed and they look completely natural now.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Theaters and opera, too. I'm sure the actors will be willing to get their shifts cut by 20-50 % if we help them negotiate the same pay per performance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I... what? I'm suddenly very happy for David Lynch, that he didn't live long enough to see this catch on...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›