this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
129 points (92.7% liked)

Linux

56620 readers
600 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I made the unfortunate post about asking why people liked Arch so much (RIP my inbox I'm learning a lot from the comments) But, what is the best distro for each reason?

RIP my inbox again. I appreciate this knowledge a lot. Thank you everyone for responding. You all make this such a great community.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kaidezee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Gentoo, because if it exists - compile it.

[–] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Ubuntu.

Why? - I guess I'm too lazy for distro hopping now :(

Besides, this was the 1st Linux distro I tried back in 2005. After the usual ditro hopping phase was over, I settled on it; somehow (irrespective of snap and other controversies) I feel at home.

[–] Aimeeloulm@feddit.uk 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

For me its Linux Mint, I'm no longer in position really to do distro hopping, so long as Linux Mint keeps working I will keep using it, I see no reason to change right now. I'm glad and happy that you have settled on Ubuntu, have fun, enjoy and be happy huuuugs 😉

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bluefruit@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I agree. I tried Fedora first, then Pop!OS, and then settled on Kubuntu.

Kubuntu has been the most stable so far, no big issues. I chose it for that and its Wayland support. Snaps can be disabled or even have auto update turned off which is what I did and I had no real issues with Ubuntu past that so overall a good distro.

Widely supported, plenty of tutorials, has my favorite DE as a spin, it just does what I need it to.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 weeks ago

Mint Cinnamon.

It's easy, stable and gets out of my way.

I haven't seen the need to dostro hop for years.

[–] bbleml@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

NixOS. I've gotten so used to the declarative nature of NixOS, that I simply cannot go back to a "normal" distro anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

My way of thinking and working is incompatible with most premade automatism, it utterly confuses me when a system is doing something on its own without me configuring it that way.

That's why I have issues with many of the "easy" distributions like Ubuntu. Those want to be to helpful for my taste. Don't take me wrong, I am not against automatism or helper tools/functions, not at all. I just want to have full knowledge and full control of them.

I used Gentoo for years and it was heaven for me, the possibility to turn every knob exactly like I wanted them to be was so great, but in the end was the time spend compiling everything not worth it.

That's why I changed to Arch Linux. The bare bone nature of the base install and the high flexibility of pacman and the AUR are ideal for me. I love that Arch by default is not easy, that it doesn't try to anticipate what I want to do. If something happens automatically it is because I configured the system to behave that way.

Linux is so great, because there is a distribution for nearly everyone out there (unless you are blind, then things are not that great apparently, but it seems to get better).

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago
[–] ar1@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I just want to learn more about what are the differences between distros, so that they will be better or worse? Are all the distros having the same GNU/Linux kernel so that if I replace all the Arch userland files into Debian's, the system will become Debian?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've discovered that I don't much care which distro I'm using, it's the DE that matters most. I have Fedora GNOME, Debian GNOME, and openSUSE GNOME running on different machines. I can't really tell much difference until I enter the command line or package manager, and even then, it's the front end of the command that changes while the backend stays mostly the same. Flatpak has made the difference between distros even fewer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheCynicalSaint@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Fedora is quite unremarkable, no issues of late. Or ever, for that matter. It's glorious.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Crabhands@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

EndeavorOS. It runs smooth, i dont get errors, all my games work, the taskbar and notifications work like I would expect them too. Switching from Windows 2 months ago, I cycled through a few distros but they all were giving something up until i found EoS.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pyssla@quokk.au 3 points 2 weeks ago

A bit of tinkering. Thoughts?

Obligatory "There is not a single distro that's the absolute best for each and every one." disclaimer aside, my personal favorite is definitely secureblue for being a hardened-by-default distro that adheres to the ~~'immutable'~~ reprovisionable, anti-hysteresis paradigm while enjoying a healthy stream of improvements pushed out by an active group of contributors.

[–] yaroto98@lemmy.org 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Garuda - all the benefits of arch with an easy installer. And it's prettier (in my opinion) than EndeavorOS. Gaming is pretty great.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

having tried many distros over the years, Arch (and most derivatives) is best for me
pacman is the best i've used, packages are very up to date, and it's pretty easy to troubleshoot with the enormous amount of info on the wiki and elsewhere

[–] Drito@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Since I was tired of distro hopping I just use MX Linux.

[–] menemen@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I use Kubuntu. It is defintly not the best Distro. I am just used to it and too lazy to get used to another distro. My days as a distro jumper lie 15 years back...

Tbh though, I might switch to Debian stable whenever Trixie comes out.

[–] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

Endeavour OS is the best because you get all the benefits of Arch combined with a familiar and friendly installer, a good out of the box setup with the desktop of your choice. Not to mention the outstanding community that's built up around it.

[–] callcc@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Since I'm old and need to deal with administrating a bunch of machines for work, I settled on the most dull and unsurprising distros of all: debian. Sure, when I was younger and eager to learn and with much time on my hands, I used gentoo (basically what is now arch) and all the others too.

[–] procapra@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

Because I don't have a fickle heart, and My distro is the best, right now, for me. There's nothing more to it. I do like Mint - but a few apps are out of date, and that's annoying. But it's stable, looks great, and works like a charm.

Mac OS is my favorite Linux distro.

[–] Frederic@beehaw.org 3 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

MX Linux (Debian based), using it for almost 10 years now (before, it was Ubuntu). Based on Debian, very stable, always up to date for every kernel/apps, use native .deb no snap no flatpak no systemd. Also it is using Xfce by default, the best DE.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Azzk1kr@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago

I've been using (X)Ubuntu for ages. I just wanted something that "just works". Tired of too much tinkering and there's plenty of (non commercial) support. Mixing it with i3 as my window manager.

Roast me ;)

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Because it uses the best desktop environment (GNOME) and im the most familiar with

(I wonder how many downvotes i will get)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] banazir@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

My choice of distro is just a compromise and close enough to serving my needs. All distros have pros and cons, and I use different distros for different use cases.

[–] dysprosium@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Arch.

Do I need to justify myself any further?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

ZorinOS is the best for me, because it works out of the box, looks a lot like Windows which i'm used to, is relatively configurable and is free (the paid version is just cosmetics and prebundled additional software). I consider looking into Arch though, thanks to your post and the comments there ;)

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›