Mouse -> Mice
Louse -> Lice
House -> Hice
this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
643 points (99.4% liked)
Curated Tumblr
6043 readers
2 users here now
For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.
Here are some OCR tools to assist you in transcribing posts:
-
FOSS Android Recs per u/m_f@discuss.online: 1 , 2
Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ox - oxen
box - boxen
equinox - equinoxen
xerox - xeroxen
Die - Dice
Pie - Pice
Tie - Tice
Lie - Lice
All these lice and misinformation....smh
Lice <- Louse
Tice <- Touse
Pice <- Pouse
Dice <- Douse
But also
die - dies
If we're talking about tools.
Check out this sweet moof!
I checked out your ma's sweet moof last night 👉😏👉
I'll accept groof if it means we get moof and rooves.
Language is descriptive, so there’s nothing stopping you from using “rooves”, other than what typically results from using words others may not understand. Get enough people over long enough a timeline, and “rooves” becomes the norm, and “roofs” becomes archaic. Just gotta put in the effort.
I can groof to that!
Ew! Perv.
Not really, unless they're booving that groofy moof. Then, they're lost to us, in the land of boxen and meeses.
That sounds exactly like the kind of thing a dirty groofer would say!
MODS BAN THIS ONE RIGHT NOW WON’T SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!
Dialectic morphology is a mofo.
eg. "w00t" is a word. 🤮
🤮
is a word
load more comments
(5 replies)
Because the English language is known for its rigid consistency of pluralization.
This dude thinks that the singular of hooves is "hoove"
I am Groof.
rooves and roofs are both accepted as correct though? Roofs being the standard is a pretty new thing, and not the more common one everywhere
I haven't once seen 'rooves' used, let alone be considered as correct.
Wiktionary says it changed in the 17th century, so depending on your definition of "new", sure. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/roofs
It doesn't sound weird to me personally, although it does look weird when written out.
It is how I was taught in the 80s, and I went to school in Europe, and the US. So, pretty recently it was quite common.
Groofy.
Okay, but think about this: Groofy.
As soon as I typed that, I changed my mind. No longer defending groof.
One might say it sounds ... goofy.
They're on the roof, they've found the groof
You beat me to it. When I saw this post I wondered if this is where they got the word from lol
Would most native speakers actually pronounce "rooves" differently from "roofs"? Is "grooves" already pronounced differently from a hypothetical "groofs"?
There is a difference, but it depends on accent. I don't think anyone would notice in speech if you switched though
I think there is a slight difference. Ooves is slightly longer and softer sounding than oofs.
f is the voiceless labiodental fricative and v is the voiced labiodental fricative.
Basically for roofs your vocal cords don't vibrate on the final f sound. For rooves your vocal cords vibrate on the final v sound.
I know the difference between f and v, the question is whether it makes a difference in this specific case and if yes, whether most native English speakers actually know that. I'm not a native English speaker and words that end in -ooves aren't that common (when is the last time you said "grooves" or "hooves"?).
English is famously inconsistent about how written letters are pronounced, and it has a lot of different accents.
Grooves and hooves are more common words than roofs.
I think I would notice if someone said groofs or hoofs (although that's also a word with a different meaning), but I'm really not sure I'd notice rooves vs roofs.
I am a native speaker. The pronunciation difference between those two words, even though one doesn’t actually exist, is only the vibration of vocal cords in the final sound. It’s like belief and believe.
load more comments
(4 replies)
the plural of roof should be roof. fite me
Reef
milf - milves
We are groof.
I propose we use roofies! It sounds cute and probably isn't taken already.
view more: next ›