this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
369 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

73331 readers
3654 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brunoqc@piefed.ca 101 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Clickbait title. Just say it's meshtastic.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I mean it's an article for people like me who have never heard of that

Sure, but they could at least put that in the title as well so people who are familiar w/ it don't need to click through.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 64 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Ok.......what's meshtastic? I still haven't clicked the article, and know nothing of which you speak.

I'd say this title is for people like me. I think it sounds cool.

[–] pezhore@infosec.pub 28 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

It is cool! The barrier to entry is relatively low. The only thing to really worry about is:

  1. What band/frequency is appropriate for you country.
  2. Are there others around to which you can connect?

If there's not a lot of people around it's not the end of the world. Nodes can connect over the Internet via MQTT servers. Yes, this defeats the purpose of having an offline/decentralized communication platform, but it is a good stop gap until more nodes are put up.

Here's a sample of what I can see in a somewhat large-ish Midwest City in the US (there's about 63 nodes I can reach by hopping through relays).

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Where'd you get that map from?

[–] pezhore@infosec.pub 2 points 4 hours ago

The official meshtastic app has a map view that shows all known nodes.

[–] themadcodger@kbin.earth 6 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I got mine recently in a dxent aized city and while there are plenty of nodes popping up on the map, the local channel is pretty quiet. Is that normal?

[–] pezhore@infosec.pub 4 points 19 hours ago

Yep, that can be normal. For my city, the local group has a private (but free to join) channel that's a bit more active.

Do a web search for meshtastic and your city and see if one pops up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brunoqc@piefed.ca 16 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

It allows us to make a mesh network (interconnected nodes where you can contact a node even if it's not in range for you, by using other nodes) with Lora radio devices. Lora is slow but has long range. I think it works better when you have line of sight, like if someone can put a node on a mountain, it would help everyone.

I think people might have sent audio with it but it's mostly useful for text messages. It could be useful if the Internet is down, maybe, but it's more like a toy.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 hours ago

It could be useful if the Internet is down, maybe, but it’s more like a toy.

Since LoRa devices use very little power this can be useful when there is no electricity.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Definitely clickbait. The phrase "send texts" as it's been used for the past quarter century means "sms texts" or maybe "text messages to other people on mobile phone networks", which is not at all what this is.

Exactly. I was hyped because I'd like to send and receive SMS w/o a mobile phone. I was hoping someone implemented the protocol so I could integrate it into my desktop, the "no wi-fi or cell service" was merely a bonus.

But no, this is just a way to communicate over a different radio protocol than mobile phone standards.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mbourgon@lemmy.world 134 points 1 day ago (38 children)

Nice article on Meshtastic. The problem is that, like anything, the actual distance is a lot more dependent on line of sight and the actual mesh existing. Which means we’d need a LOT more people to adopt these and put up repeaters for them to be useful. Which is doable, but not cheap.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 53 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Have a look at meshmap.net. That shows people who have voluntarily put themselves on a map.

Although it can be a serious underestimation, for example in my area, I'm the only one who lists myself on the map, but there are about 10 other nodes that don't

Edit: Also, the number of nodes on MeshMap has pretty much doubled in six months since I started playing with it.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 1 points 34 minutes ago

Nice, 0 within 25 kilometers of me lol.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I always thought these were more like walkie talkies for messaging than telephones that you can call anyone.

Like it would be good if cell serivce goes down.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 27 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

That's pretty much exactly what they are. Text message in walkie-talkies. With the added benefit that if your friend can't hear you, but another friend is in between, your message automatically gets relayed through their walkie-talkie.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

If I wanted to transmit, for example, temperature and humidity from a sensor once every 5 minutes, would the network be willing to carry my signals?

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 12 points 21 hours ago

https://meshtastic.org/docs/configuration/radio/device/

SENSOR is one of the defined device roles. And whether for personal automation or public information, it is a reasonable use case for the network.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)
[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 23 points 23 hours ago (16 children)

I maintain three of these devices, if anyone has any questions.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

What kind of data rate can they provide? Can it support audio? Low bit-rate video?

I've seen LoRa when Pine64 announced some related products some years back, but I haven't really gotten into it. If the community is big enough and the bitrate reasonable enough, I might get one to connect my home to my parents home (about 10 miles away, so at the edge of the range) for fun. It would be cool to set up some smart home stuff at both ends that I could host on my own so I can keep an "eye" on my parents stuff when the travel (mostly just door and occupancy sensors, no video).

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 1 points 56 minutes ago (1 children)

In theory the protocol can support those formats. With meshtastic it's only designed for text. You can get some really basic emojis though since they are Unicode.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 minutes ago (1 children)

If its simple enough, I could probably abuse it to send binary data by encoding everything in base64 or something, and writing a simple translator for whatever my app is.

But what does the usable bandwidth look like, and what about latency? If I'm going just out of range from direct communication, I assume I'd be going through other peoples' nodes, but is that intelligent enough to route messages through efficiently? Or could I see crazy latency spikes?

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 1 points 2 minutes ago* (last edited 1 minute ago)

You are at the edge of what I know :) If you find out, let the rest of us know. I only have vague and hand wavy knowledge at this point of lora slow means lots of latency. GL!

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

How does this differ from IP over ham radio? It seems like in general, it would just be lower distance and greater reliance on nodes near you, with the trade off being smaller equipment.

https://themodernham.com/ip-over-ham-radio-via-new-packet-radio/

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Its biggest + in my book is that you don't have to be a ham to make it work. There are better systems if you want more reliable communications. But its a fun side hobby and, in the event of a power outage, a decent little communicator. Although from personal experience, most of the devices piggy back of your existing cell phones and bluetooth. So ironically as long as the cell towers aren't blown to hell, your still fine either way.

[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You don't need cell towers. Your phone is just used as an input device for the radio.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

There may be some miscommunication. I ment that in order to use a majority of the meshtastic devices, they require the android or ios app + bluetooth. Not all, but a vast majority. And most of those will have access to a cell phone tower that will likely not go down, even in the event your neighborhood power goes off. At least where I am at. The devices have often been alluded to a disaster proof communications device. And an alternative to instant messaging. Its not as reliable as some other tech that is out there, but its a fun hobby!

Hope that makes more sense.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›