this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
1219 points (98.4% liked)

196

18151 readers
530 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1219
boytoyrule (piefedimages.s3.eu-central-003.backblazeb2.com)
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JayObey711@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This actually happened to me when I worked at McDonald's. Guy wanted a toy for boys. I listed all the stuff we had and asked to pick. None of the toys were really gendered at all. He kept insisting that I should just pick a toy for boys.

[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes sir. A toy for boys. Are we speaking of a genderfluid boy maybe or an honest god-fearing, completely heteronormative boy - no shame in that, sir, it's not your fault.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago

"Bless your little heart sir. I know it's not easy choosing the "boy toy" when one isn't pink. But I need to reach deep down into those man genes and deduce which one is the boy toy. If you choose poorly then you and your kids are super gay now. Dems da rules sir!."

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well obviously the boy toys are the ones I use my penis to play with.

Coukd also be for the they/them's though.

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 200 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This triggers a memory!

Once when I was a kid, I went with a friend to McDonalds while they were doing some Disney promotion or another. We got the "girl or boy toy with your happy meal?" question. We were both girls so we automatically answered "girl toy." After eating we looked and saw that we both had Jasmine from Aladdin, and if we had said "one of each please" we would have had both Aladdin and Jasmine, which would have been a lot more fun to play with while we waited for our parents to wrap up whatever they were doing. So we decided that next time we would ask for one of each. Well the next time was toward the end of the promotion and all they had left were the girl toys, meaning we ended up with four Jasmine figurines.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 60 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I can feel the lingering pain you still carry about having these 4 useless Jasmine and not a single Aladdin when reading this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Newsteinleo@midwest.social 126 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Some will see this and think this is a sign of progress, that we are transitioning into a society where your genitals don't determine what toys you get to play with. Others will look at this and think the world is slipping in anarchy and moral decay.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Whats wrong with anarchy? Talk all the shit you like; it works better than kleptocracy or fascism.

[–] Newsteinleo@midwest.social 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Interesting question, is anarchy better than Kleptocracy? How does money function without the backing of a government, would you have to go back to a bartering system? Could you even have a global supply chain in the absence of a stable government? Could people be able to self actualize in an unstable society?

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

money

Plenty of ways, it's older than governments.

But also we don't need it, and while it does setve a purpose, there are other ways to do that, most of which are less trouble.

global supply chain

Yes? Most of them arent at the behest of governments right now. I have personally put together a supply chain that covered a couple thousand miles, and that was me being a stoner; far from an expert.

[–] Newsteinleo@midwest.social 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

For your "stoner supply chain" did you exchange currency backed by some organization or did you exchange precious metals? How did you and other parties agree on the value of what was exchanged?

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Well it was drugs(legal now, i think legal then), refined drugs, and candy that was drugged with the refined drugs. I paid in candy. Everyone was hippies, and mostly happy with the arrangement while it lasted.

Like i said; i did this because i wanted to get high on hard candy.

Its not all that complicated, but there were intermediate processing steps, a bit of distance, and a finished product with a couple inputs. I did this as an unhoused stoned 20 year old with zero education on the topic. It's hard, it's not magic.

Everybody involved wanted the product (hard candy that gets you high) to get made, and so they made it.

We live in a world that traps everything behind money. That makes money seem important. It's not.

I want computers to exist. If nobody's making them, im gonna ask an electrical engineer if they're doing anything, and out a team together to build the thing. I don't need money. I need computers to exist. If i need rare earth bullshit, ill ask who has that, and if they want computers to exist.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There was moral outrage when faster, cheaper printing presses were invented because they were worried people wouldn't learn or memorize anything anymore if they could just write it down & it made literacy accessible to the common person.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 64 points 3 days ago

I'm glad I wasn't sober when someone incidentally compared happy meal toys to the invention of movable type.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There was a moral panic in the 19th century where people were outraged that young girls from good families kept reading novels. They said it would lead to social self-isolation and bookishness and distract from apropriate activities like knitting, socialising, looking pretty and smiling.

And young women were thought to be largely unable to discern fact from fiction and hold their gentlemen callers to the same standards as the men in their novels. And you know, women having standards... the 18th century couldn't have that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 10 points 2 days ago

Some of those "morals" need to decay.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The third group of us secretly want both toys

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I wish they just didn't give out crappy plastic toys at all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Would you like the Fashion Police Annihilator Pistol or the Commando Laser Hairbrush?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 72 points 3 days ago (1 children)

neither of them are boys. One is a doll the other is a toy car.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago

So... give them a Ken? Lol

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I'd be a great boy toy ;) One at a time please, ladies.

load more comments
view more: next ›