this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
623 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

73567 readers
3569 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 2 hours ago

Buy EU, am I right?

Geezus...

[–] sircac@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

This is not the Europe I remember...

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 hours ago

I know right? Need more style to this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsFnLuqHa20

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 27 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Is the EU not subject to GDPR?

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 13 points 7 hours ago

Rules are for the people, not governments

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

The EU decides what's GDPR. And it seems recently it decided to not be buggered by those old ideas that are privacy, freedom, etc.

[–] hiramfromthechi@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I'm starting to edit idcaboutprivacy more and more often (and that's not a good thing)

[–] dynamoMaus@feddit.org 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I like the comapirson i heared at Anne Roths(https://systemli.social/@anneroth) talk(German):

You would never say: I don't need free speech because I have nothing to say. Everyone profits from data privacy and free speech and some people are depending on their life on it.

[–] belit_deg@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Dude, I decided to make a personal note with lots of similar links regarding privacy, so that I can provide the source when I discuss these matters with people. But yours in much more thorough - and public. Thanks for saving me a ton of work!

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's not the EU yet. It's a group of activists from Denmark. There wasn't even preliminary voting on it yet.
Doesn't mean we need to be complacent of course, but so far nothing happened.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

but so far nothing happened

Things happens frighteningly fast these days. It's not a matter of being complacent; it's a matter of budding things in the nip. Which won't work. Then tirelessly fight back against it.

Unless you've been sleeping under a rock these last few… weeks. Not even months. Some legislation can go from 0 to 100 extremely quickly if left unchecked.

[–] Trihilis@ani.social 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

How the fuck can you be pro censorship/pro big brother? What kind of idiot do you have to be? Do they just get bags of money to spout out this bullshit?

Does having a lot of money exempt you from this shit? I don't get it. I can understand detestable people being pro things that make the poor poor and the rich rich. But this affect everyone both poor and rich. The only one benefiting from this are fascist dictators.

[–] KumaSudosa@feddit.dk 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's not "Danish activists" but rather the government. As a Dane I know how horny these people are to create a fullblown police/nanny state. SVM (the name for the government) is terrible for all of us. Can't wait to see their voter share drastically diminish at the next election, but clearly they can do a lot of harm first..

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, Danish government comprised of people. And some people there are activists about this particular bullshit, so they're pushing it at every opportunity.
I should've been more specific that it's not just random group of people, but my point was that it's not the decision of the entire EU (or even the entire Danish government)

[–] KumaSudosa@feddit.dk 1 points 4 hours ago

The SVM government as a whole is huge on expanding surveillance and the police force - I don't see that it's just a small group of activists within the parties. I'm just glad other EU countries aren't biting on this bs

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

What activists? I need their names, for personal research reasons.

[–] join@lemmy.ml 99 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Maybe it’s time to restart some some old Greek traditions and propose a law that anyone proposing chat control - from here on out - gets banished for life from entering European soil ever again.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Thank god my OS doesn't care about EU regulation

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

As long as owning a device that allow full E2E encryption without spyware isn't illegal.

It bears repeating a lot of time : the technology to circumvent these things exist, and will continue to exist. However, there's nothing preventing obtuse lawmakers from making it illegal to own. And then, it's just a matter of catching someone and finding some rooted android phone in his pocket.

[–] sefra1@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Your OS doesn't, put the messaging apps that your friends/family/coworkers use do.

And no, you can't convince them to switch messager, I tried.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Currently, I, my entire Family and everyone I know use Signal. And everyone that doesn't want to, can contact me via Matrix or XMPP, which literally no one ever does, even thought I know a lot of IT and CS people. I keep them as options regardless, just to offer them to people.

I mean, there is also phone, SMS and email of course, but people seem to prefer a new messenger over actually contacting me in any of these ways. And then I'm always like "look, you can choose one of countless ways to contact me, if you like none of them, that's a you-problem".

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 2 points 7 hours ago

You don't have to say everything on those apps, tho, just do basic stuff and for longer convos request an encrypted chat app.

[–] cosmo@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

I, at least, managed to get most of my family to switch. I told them it was the only way they'd get pictures and updates of my son. The one small victory I'm satisfied with.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 23 hours ago

And no, you can’t convince them to switch messager, I tried.

Have you used the gambling addiction and honeypot comparisons?

Or opium smoking in China one?

If somebody makes a functioning NOSTR client similar to Telegram in experience - maybe that will be convenient enough.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago

And what do you think that means the moment your OS connects to, oh I don't know, the rest of the fucking planet?

[–] 332@feddit.nu 151 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Absolutely unacceptable and ridiculous.

[–] PiratPartiet@feddit.nu 1 points 23 hours ago

We couldn't have said it better!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mavytan@feddit.nl 108 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Ugh, this shit again...

Are there any initiatives out there to call a stop to this? Or even better, initiatives to introduce legislation that forbids setting up this kind of surveillance infrastructure altogether?

[–] PiratPartiet@feddit.nu 6 points 23 hours ago

Well we in the Swedish Pirate Party are strongly against this! We have been fighting since the beginning against Chat Control! Feel free to DM me and I can even try to find a Pirateparty near you or atleast a party who are aligned similarly!

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

The annoying thing is that some states like Germany pretty much prohibit surveillance of this extend by constitution. It couldn‘t be made any harder for a legislation like this to pass and yet they keep trying.

[–] Noja@sopuli.xyz 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)
[–] katkit@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Patrick Breyer with the pirate party is my go to example of why small parties and extraparliamentary opposition is important. 99% of the people don't even know him and he's just doing such an sucessful job of protecting them anyway.

[–] PiratPartiet@feddit.nu 5 points 23 hours ago

Thank you for helping us stop chat control! We from the Swedish Pirate Party are strongly against this!

[–] angelmountain@feddit.nl 29 points 1 day ago

Your local Pirate Party and organizations like Bits of Freedom can help out.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The fuck is happening over there? Was there lead in the water?

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

It's not lead, it's Russians

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 32 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Authoritarianism, duh. It’s a global thing.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›