this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
1598 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

73877 readers
3775 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 7) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 325 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (35 children)

Age verification is a great success I see. I feel so much safer now with this shit in place so kids can't watch porn...

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 135 points 1 week ago

...on major/regulated sites only.

[–] PushButton@lemmy.world 117 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The worst was watching porn on spotify...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago

It has absolutely nothing to do with kids watching porn.

Of course.

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

*so that the government can say kids won't watch porn.

Rule 1 of computers that everyone who has taught an ICT class learns - if little Timmy wants titties, he finds a way.

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 185 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

ah from shady porn sites, like spotify and wikipedia. definitely protect kids from porn there. /s

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is wikipedia on the list? I see reddit is, lol. We might see an influx soon.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 60 points 1 week ago (1 children)

not yet, but the wikimedia foundation has been fighting against it expecting that it would be a class 1 site and require it.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We have to protect wikipedia

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Here's one way to help: https://kiwix.org/en/about-us/#our-story

Download Wikipedia to your own device. If it's ever blocked or taken down you still have access and can help share information with others.

You can download different versions (e.g. without images) and different languages based on your needs.

There's other resources available via kiwix as well but I've not really explored them to be honest

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So I feel like I'm now hearing more successful pushes for censorship through this stuff.

Just last week I learned how Texas has a bill that makes it so if anyone ever invested in green technology that they wouldn't be allowed

https://www.texastribune.org/2022/08/24/texas-boycott-companies-fossil-fuels/

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 140 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let this be a reminder to never turn away from piracy. It needs to constantly be in the background and if any company gets like they always do, then it comes back out. But if we let the knowledge fade away then it's impossible to rebuild it.

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 72 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Piracy preserves media.

Piracy preserves art.

Piracy makes sure, that future generations still have access to the creations of humanity.

Data hoarding is a service to the public.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 77 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Or you know you could punish parents for not parenting. Like if kids are watching porn and caught and if it's actually against some law then go after the parents.

It's not hard to teach parents how to implement a filtering DNS. But no, countries think they need to be the nanny.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 125 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

"Protecting children" is just the pretext under which governments can sell increased surveillance. The fact that there are more effective ways they could act to protect children, yet governments everywhere continue to push for ID checks and monitoring online activity, shows that the aim isn't what they say it is.

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 48 points 1 week ago

Don't forget trying to kill e2e encryption like what the EU wants to do, both to "catch criminals" and "protect the children"

https://www.theparliamentmagazine.eu/news/article/the-end-of-encryption-as-we-know-it

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Protect from what? I mean seriously. Most of us (guys at least) probably saw porn way before we were old enough and most of us probably didn't end up as rapists or pedophiles. It's not a good thing by any means, but it really feels like we're trying harder to keep sexual material from entering their brains than we are trying to keep them fed, clothed, educated, housed, healthy, loved, and physically safe. Of all the things I mentioned the last seven have a monumentally greater affect on their success and well-being as an adult.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's just the pretext they give to justify it. The real reason is surveillance. Now they have a way to confidently tie your accounts to your individual identity. And most of these solutions use third parties which will then sell that data as well, so now anyone can tie your account to you without you ever knowing.

Even if the government is barred from surveilling citizens in these ways, third parties aren't, and the government can just buy that information, no warrant needed anymore.

And these laws never stop at porn, it's drugs, LGBTQ information, etc. and they can always easily add additional things later with little fanfare.

[–] Epzillon@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is it. Theyve been going after encrypted messaging apps for a long time, ig they realized theyre not getting anywhere and figured to just hit it head on.

The internet has always circumvented this kind of shit, just look at TPB. The ones who are getting really beaten up by this is the older generations and the ones lacking technical know-how.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago

It’s not about kids and never has been, it’s about surveillance of the internet and the death of anonymity.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 62 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that's like saying Amazon fans really lol

[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 19 points 1 week ago

Well.... ...gestures to apple fans...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 57 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (14 children)

Back to Piracy! ✊🏴‍☠️

Really though? It isn't necessary. Use Bandcamp, you probably have half your artists covered. The rest - one of those Spotify alternatives: Tidal? Qobuz?

Personally I do selfhost btw. Jellyfin, though I heard of a better alternative specifically for music recently - and forgot the name again 😥 Something lowercase, ~~like a verb... "normalize" or some such.~~ Navidrome! Thanks @0konomiyaki@aussie.zone

[–] kepix@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

more like 3% bandcamp availability. i know this is a linux/trans/selfhost/overpayeddev/westeu/foss echochamber, but im not wasting electricity and money on selfhost if a 1tb sd card in my phone can do the same thing offline.

[–] thedarkfly@feddit.nl -1 points 6 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (28 children)

Never stopped. Get your own mp3s kids.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] ashenone@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 week ago

Even if your not in the UK you should go back to piracy. Steal from corporations as frequently as possible

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 36 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I jerked it to the Hanson mmbop video back in the nineties.

Found out later the girl was a boy.

You can judge all you want, but the general thing is that horny teenagers will jerk it to almost anything.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (6 children)

..........genuinely trying to figure out how this relates to the topic at hand.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] bluecat_OwO@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

ngl, Spotify has become hot ass these days

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (5 children)

My favorite part is when the AI DJ plays some dumb song it's previously served up repeatedly, and then tells me how much I like it because I listen to it so often. I'd never choose to listen to it on my own, and the only reason I hear it is because Spotify keeps cramming it down my throat.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 week ago (22 children)

Just do it.

Flac > Spotify.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] fittedsyllabi@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Already using Spotify to pirate music.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They will be blown away by the quality increase they get🤭

(Pirate tend to share/prefere best quality content, while Spotify offers only 256kbit mp3 as far as I remember (or is it 320kbi now?))

[–] dunz@feddit.nu -2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Spotify uses vorbis if I'm not mistaken, not mp3. Mp3 sounds like absolute ass, even at 320.

Edit: why the downvotes? Spotify does use vorbis. Mp3 has weird artefacts, even at 320.

[–] moody 20 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Most people can't tell the difference between 128 kbit MP3 and high quality recordings.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 6 days ago

How about 48 kbit MP3? And more than that, for plenty of recordings that's sufficient.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

One more reason if you're still buying music, to start buying physical albums again while you still can.

CDs aren't age-gated and you can rip them to FLAC yourself. Vinyl also isn't age-gated because it's analog, and although it's a longer and more drawn-out process than just ripping a CD which will only take a few minutes as because vinyl is an analog format, you gotta record it in real-time, and then manually split the raw waveform up into separate tracks, manually input metadata, and manually generate a cuesheet from the split-up tracks before finally exporting*, you can still needle-drop LPs to FLAC as well.

*This isn't as big an issue with 78s, 45s, and EPs (which are 33-1/3rpm singles last time I thought) as it is with LPs as there isn't as much playback time on them, and at least 45s and EPs are singles rather than a full album like with LPs so you only have one song per side, and I assume 78s are singles as well, as 78s max out at 5min per side.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (10 children)

If something's finally going to force the industry to curb its bullshit, this might just be it. Once you annoy normal people, it's all over. They seriously underestimate how many people would just stop using Spotify, or Youtube, or whatever other platform it is

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›