this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
271 points (98.9% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

13439 readers
423 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago

I predict him... mistaken.

[–] _core@sh.itjust.works 29 points 6 days ago

He says that the police will be under constant surveillance. They already are and they still get away with crimes. Unless being a criminal is a cops best behaviour.

[–] Rubisco@slrpnk.net 29 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Hey man, nice shot.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

while billionaires keep raping kids? yea no, go fuck yourself. this sounds like ravings of a person afraid of losing his possessions and life.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Why do billionaires always look like creepy Madame Tussauds wax statues?

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago

He's literally 80 years old. You can only do so much to hide your age before you start looking absurd.

[–] ButtermilkBiscuit@feddit.nl 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Someone should Luigi this fuckwit

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

~~Sci-Fi Author~~ George Orwell: In my book I invented the ~~Torment Nexus~~ telescreen as a cautionary tale

Tech Company: At long last, we have created the ~~Torment Nexus~~ telescreen from classic ~~sci-fi~~ dystopian novel ~~Don't Create The Torment Nexus~~ Nineteen Eighty-Four.

[–] chris@lemmy.zip 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Can we have a crowd-sourced bounty system for billionaires? The more billions they have the higher the bounty. I think it would be a good investment of public funds and benefit mankind greatly.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Be the change you want to see in the world.

[–] capsdroopy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 days ago

Truly nothing like Big Brother telling you he's gonna big brother you. And of course don't forget that those in power will never be subjected to this, it's only for the little peasants in case they may decide to not fully conform to their ideal society (wageslaving to make the rich richer until you drop dead)

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The 0.1% are like turbo hedonists. If they beat the population into being severe ascetics then the ones who stick out will be: elites, politicians, authorities, politicians, suck-ups, spoiled heirs, politicians, etc.

I think all the little things people "get to do" help contribute to the "temporarily embarrassed millionaire" mentality. Take that away and there's going to be significantly less tolerance for corruption.

And the elites will create a system where the only way to vote is to spill blood.

Isn't that literally the premise of 1984?

[–] Kurious84 7 points 6 days ago

Melt face son and a bitch. You can't take that wealth with you scumbag.

[–] appropriateghost@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

lol is this guy seriously discounting that people, fully non-anonymous and out in the public view, can be assholes?

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

Also discounting what the rest of our definitions of assholes are.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Or that the current administration is holding up and defending a child rapist? Lmao.

[–] shaggyb@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Suck my best behaving ball

[–] Kurious84 2 points 6 days ago

I'll throw in a low hanging hairy one as well.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Like hell I will. I’ll be free until the clankers come for me

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How was the Victorian era a surveillance state? Getting away with murder was basically a sure thing unless you were literally caught while sticking a knife into someone in broad daylight.

Idk what you're smoking but can I have some as well

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I was relating "best behaviour" to the strict moral standards of the Victorian era. Is the surveillance related to breaking the law or catching you in an embarrassing situation? If it's the second case then we'll all surely be vexed.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think you're probably imagining life in high society after watching everything Julian Fellowes has written.

Victorian prudishness is somewhat a myth. Not like completely, ofc, but way overblown.

If you'd make your argument just for Victorian high society, I might be inclined to agree. If you make it also for the middle classes, I'll be skeptical. And if you argue that the working classes would've all shared in those strict morals, then I'll disagree.

Although I'd like to point out that those Victorian high society or upper-middle class people, especially women, would've been de facto under surveillance most of the time, constantly having other people or at least servants around watching them.

But like we know from Downton Abbbey and the Gilded Age etc, they found ways around it as well. To answer your question about breaking the law or being embarrassed, being embarrassed would be why getting in trouble with the law would be troublesome and being embarrassed might mean being thrown out of society, which would be way worse than having to pay some fines.

Ooh I think there's a new gilded age episode today btw

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Lots of words based on current tv culture. I don't watch the shows you are getting your information from. You may be right though. Human nature has been the same forever but there are pockets of collected, contrived, and derived behaviour, hither and yon, throughout history. Look at the USA today as a recent example that takes place in the television age (so you should be aware of that at least). I hope you enjoy your television episode you are excited about. Don't make assumptions about me and what I watch. It makes you seem stupider than your fancy words imply. You seem like you are talking down to me in your answer so in the best historical context I can muster I would say...fuck off you arrogant piece of smugness. That took a turn, didn't it?

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I don't get my information from TV-shows, you shouldn't do that kid. I get my information from actual sources so I can spot anachronisms in tv-shows. Now that you'd understand since half the vocabulary went over your head by your own admission despite "the Gilded Age" being a literal and actual period of history.

I don't have a TV and I would never put some reality TV garbage in it, which you're clearly addicted to.

in the best historical context I can muster I would say...fuck off you arrogant piece of smugness.

Ooh, babby a lil' mad that I pointed out how little they know? :(

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You guys who deny you watch television but constantly reference it are a dime a dozen. I think I heard that screed you wrote on an old "Fridays" skit. Try an original thought once in a while and show some authenticity. Ooohhh....I'm so mad and toddlerish right now! My "fuck off" still stands though. Bye sweetie.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I reference shows which I watch.

I haven't had a broadcast TV in my apartment for like 15-20 years, got tired of the ads and never went back.

I download shows I choose to watch, to watch when I so choose.

You really thought you had a gotcha there, didn't'ya?

I think I heard that screed you wrote on an old "Fridays" skit.

I've no idea what this means. Are you having a stroke? Should I alert the authorities?

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 95 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Says a wealth-hoarding, mass carbon-polluting asshole. His ethics and those of everyday people are vastly vastly different due to his inability to pay taxes.

*You best start believing in Technofeudalist societies, you're in one. *

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Inability?

Larry Ellison pays less taxes than you because he is a parasite on society and we let him steal from us.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Yeah, right. His inability is a choice, an ethical one.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (3 children)

How about the billionaires? Any rules for them?

[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago
[–] jonne@infosec.pub 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If the billionaires want the Chinese model for us, it's only fair they fall under that same model.

[–] Subdivide6857@midwest.social 2 points 6 days ago

Mr. Ed Snowden would like a word.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You know what? Seeing as how we're getting it anyway whether we like it or not, I think I'd voluntarily take the surveillance state and censorship if it comes with rich people getting absolutely stomped by the government when they get out of line.

Maybe we can adopt the Vietnamese model where that billionaire either pays back $9 billion of embezzled funds or gets executed.

If we can't have a real democracy with real freedom I at least want blood of vengeance to bathe in from time to time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is a reminder post. Remember when tech billionaire Larry Ellison said this?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 36 points 1 week ago

Oracle is one of the worst companies in history and it's products are ass.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 week ago

ORACLE: One Rich Asshole Called Larry Ellison

[–] Zier@fedia.io 27 points 1 week ago

LOL! So republicans will stop committing crimes? Can't wait to see your son destroy CBS/Paramount.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What a coinkidink!

I just predicted this morning that the way things are going his and his billionaire friend’s heads will be on pikes before the end of the decade

It will be declared an international monument that will be visited by schools for decades to come to learn about the importance of regular class wars to keep the parasites in check in a society.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EntropyFlux@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Golly, sounds like it’s time to watch Larry Ellison a lot closer too.

[–] Album@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Must be nice to say from your private Hawaiian island

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] einlander@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Does he count as a citizen? Will he be surveilled also to keep him in line? Will it force them to be kind to their employees and not cheat them?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›