this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
214 points (96.9% liked)

News

32322 readers
4017 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 66 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We got line 2k troops in DC right now that could end Trump and the fascists. They just need to wake up and remember their oath to the constitution.

[–] Sgarcnl@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sounds a lot like the plot of that film ‘civil war’

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I feel like that film didn't really have a plot. Maybe I'm miss remembering.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah, that movie sucked. The only almost good scene was the "What kind of American are you?" scene, which was entirely undermined by the fact that it ended with the guy choosing to kill the only genuine foreigners in the group instead of any of the Americans, regardless of what "kind" they were ??? Maybe I'm the one that completely missed the point.

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, I remember being underwhelmed with the lack of a coherent plot.

My armchair critique is; It didn't make any political prescriptions, or communicate any sincere analysis of real life shit. That's me being insufferable, though.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think the only message I took away from it was some sort of commentary on war journalists and maybe by extension the people who watch their coverage for conflict voyeurism. The main lady called their purpose showing the world so they can make decisions, but you can tell that's not really sitting right in her head throughout the movie, and the other two are riding an adrenaline high like it's all just exciting.

The only reason it would need to be set in America would be that if it was a war in Africa, we'd be even less inclined to see the detachment of the journalists as an issue to examine. There wasn't even all that much American on American action. The antagonists are either faceless or implied to be clinging to a lost cause on the wrong side.

The most humanized antagonist... (spoiler).The most humanized antagonist might be the brief close up on the young female suicide bomber at the start of the movie.

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Happy cakeday

[–] joker125@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

We are the plot

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

It did, but it wasn't what most people went in there for, so they didn't recognize it. It wasn't about one side or another, it was about the role of remaining neutral in a polarized situation. In the end, we still aren't sure if the president was Right or Left, but the media was clearly neutral.

[–] ClownsInSpace2@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is there a mister remembering?

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Nope, I just can't english.

[–] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So yet more actions they could have taken before trump won but chose not to because ...

[–] Tahl_eN@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

California has an indepenent committee that draws the maps. This action will require a statewide vote to temporarily override that committee's maps for this purpose. I don't think the vote would have succeeded before Trump won. Remains to be seen if the vote will succeed now.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

California held out hope that America was a representative democracy?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

…despite an absolute deluge of evidence to the contrary.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Dude has balls. Let 'em drop!

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's amazing how many Americans seem to have wanted the Democrats to stage a coup to keep the Republicans from staging a coup.

[–] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

Its not staging a coup, they could implement fair districting or ranked choice voting years ago but it would lead to people being able to support and run on policies that are more socialist then the democrats are allowed by their capitalist owners. See whats happening in NYC now due to ranked choice, that could be across the US but both parties are strongly against it.

Both parties have this issue, its just that for the republicans they decided to embrace the far right instead.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

Protecting their nation from falling into the hands of Traitors/ Criminals/Pedophiles/ Rapists/ Racists/ Morons isn't a "coup," it's obeying their paths of office to defend America "against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Those "domestic enemies?" That's MAGA.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

MAGAs are so fucking stupid, it NEVER occurs to them that the Dems can wield these same weapons in return.

The problem is, the Dems seldom do that. SCOTUS gave the president immunity superpowers, and we knew Trump would exploit the shit out of that, yet Biden didn't bother to take advantage of it, even though they knew that they were allowing an absolute proven Treasonous Criminal Pedophile Rapist to have another shot at the White House. He is literally America's biggest national security threat, and Biden should have treated as such, but he didn't. If he had, the MAGAs would have gone nuts, which would have been a good excuse to deal with them. That's how MAGAs think, Dems have to return it.

Dems don't have to match the Treason and Corruption of the MAGAs to win, but they can play Hard Ball, which only forces everybody to play strictly by the rules, and includes the Dems playing by the exact same rules. If they can redistrict the only state that will make a difference for them, then the Dems can do the same thing in the 2 or 3 states that WILL make a difference for EVERYONE.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 1 month ago
[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 5 points 1 month ago

TRUMP NEEDS TO HAVE HIS ORANGE FACE RUBBED IN THE SWAMP NEXT TO ALLIGATOR ALLEY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS ISSUE -WORLDS GREATEST COMMENTER-

[–] who@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Is this possible? My understanding of US democracy is incomplete, but I thought California alone lacked the influence to unseat a president, even if all their representatives were united.

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

True but the house is very close right now. California can take more democrat seats from republicans than Texas can take from democrats.

This isn't about removing the president that takes a simple house majority and a 2/3 senate super majority. California can't change the senate balance in favor of democrats.

Part of the reason Trump is able to do what he is doing is republican control of the house, senate, and supreme court. So talking even one of those from republicans could make a huge difference.

Assuming the democrats actually act like an opposition party.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Assuming the democrats actually act like an opposition party.

Im betting they'll take it right up to the finish line and then pretend to fall down so the Republicans claim victory. Liberals far and wide will cheer them on for "trying" and then excuse their failures because "Democrats dont have the power to do anything."

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

The Dems are famous for Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. It's their primary election identity, just like MAGA's primary election identity is Election Fraud.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago

He's exaggerating his ability to "END TRUMP'S PRESIDENCY" by mocking Trump's notorious social media post style. He doesn't really believe that, but Trump would make those same sorts of extreme predictions.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm fairly certain the implication here is making it so that there's enough to impeach him. Since Illinois is looking like they'll follow suit, it's not an idle threat. Though who knows as Republican states do the same

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

If its anything like the vote to impeach trump from weeks ago, half of house dems will vote against it.

[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Impeaching does nothing if the senate won't remove him though.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

My ass you will do! Revolution is the only solution, but the sheep's are sleeping long time now.
Waiting for the next post of how you will overthrow Trump.