this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
55 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

3857 readers
407 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Across the internet, users rely on browsers and extensions to shape how they experience the web: to protect their privacy, improve accessibility, block harmful or intrusive content, and take control over what they see. But a recent ruling from Germany’s Federal Supreme Court risks turning one of these essential tools, the ad blocker, into a copyright liability — and in doing so, threatens the broader principle of user choice online.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Germany seems to be speed-running becoming another shit-hole dystopian country.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

___________ seems to be speed-running becoming another shit-hole dystopian country

I don't know what the f happened It's like somebody just flipped a stupid switch

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago

A "copyright liability"?

Another reason we need to overhaul patent/copyright law.

Ad blockers violate copyright law like breathing violates patent law.

[–] jojo@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sooooo, AI doesn't violate copyright but ad blockers might do? That checks out for sure

Edit: weird phrasing corrected to a bit less weird

[–] polle@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

What's not mentioned here is that the overall thing started because adblock plus is a addon by a company that is making money by selling it. This is not about ublock origin.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

Nein danke.