That's not the point. Don't be pedantic. The point is that she shouldn't be in custody at all. They had the option of letting her go home with a court date. They chose to lock her up for weeks instead.
Typhoon
joined 2 days ago
We have idiots up here too.
Also we didn't stop counting cases.
It just comes off as cruel and judgy like a juvenile tween.
Just how conservatives like it.
Sounds like the meeting was just long enough for Trump to receive his new orders.
Wikipedia defines an invasion as:
An invasion is a military offensive of combatants of one geopolitical entity, usually in large numbers, entering territory controlled by another similar entity, often involving acts of aggression.[1]
Attacking Mexico would be an invasion.
Just don’t call any of this a plan for an invasion, U.S. government officials implore.
Go fuck yourself. It's an invasion.
Team Trump Is Actually Drawing Up ~~Attack~~ Invasion Plans for Mexico
Thorward said border officials had the discretion to grant Shaw humanitarian parole rather than detaining her.
There was no need to imprison a non-violent offender who had been doing everything legally and made a mistake in not renewing the travel authorization.
They should've released her and given her a mandatory court date.
How could anyone look at what's happening in the US right now and think "count me in!"?
A "copyright liability"?
Another reason we need to overhaul patent/copyright law.
Donald Trump is heavily linked to Jeffrey Epstein.
Just following orders.
People still use Google search? It's been terrible for years now.
view more: next ›
No, most administrations would recognize she's not a threat and would let her go home and make her attend a court date in the future to sort it out. Locking her up for weeks doesn't protect anyone and it doesn't solve anything. They're doing it just to be cruel.