this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
281 points (91.9% liked)

politics

25300 readers
3138 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The poll indicates support for the more aggressive position Newsom has taken in standing up to Donald Trump, particularly over a plan by Republicans in Texas to redraw their state's congressional seat map in the hopes of winning more seats in midterm elections next year.

The battle to become the 2028 presidential election candidate will likely set the new direction for the Democratic Party as it struggles with net favorability at what one recent poll showed to be a three-year low. Newsom has not formally announced his candidacy.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Americans finally knowing when to throw the gloves off and dEcOrUm. You guys had Teddy Roosevelt and he was unabashedly unafraid of the vested interests. And even if there was no Teddy, you guys also mobilised to end the first Gilded Age. You can do it again!

[–] MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If this is the basket the Democrats put their eggs into I sense 8 years of the couch fucker in our futures. Newsome fucking sucks. At best he panders to progressives with one hand while he signs yet another shady bullshit deal behind closed doors like every single other politician alive with his other.

You think it's just a coincidence that all the money they raised with that benefit concert happened to go into non-profits that his wife runs? You think its been an accident that those effected by the fires haven't seen a penny from that concert?

California has some of the most corrupt and inept leadership it has ever had. More money than ever is being spent on things like homelessness and public transit projects, but strangely both the public transit and homeless problem have only been getting worse.

Fuck Gavin Newsome.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Newsom is, and always has been, a slimy neoliberal greaseball. Not only does he not pander to progressives, he is the pinnacle of Democratic Party leftward obstructionism. Newsom serves nobody but Newsom. His current act is nothing more than the latest strategy to bolster his Presidential prospects after openly pandering to the far right failed to gain him any ground.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 day ago

Idk how he would pander to progressives after mostly vetoing progressive laws in California then going on an anti trans kick once Trump won

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 day ago (7 children)

The DNC will die before it learns a lesson.

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Voters will die before they learn the lesson. Beating fascism is more important than getting a candidate who agrees with everything you want.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yeah, let's put up another California democrat that's too centrist to attract progressives and too California to attract middle America, it worked so well last time...

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It only makes sense to those who only think hilldog and Harris lost because they were women not because they ran God awful campaigns

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 13 points 1 day ago

It's almost as if the people who find Republican issues compelling would rather vote for a full Republican than a Republican-lite. Maybe if he curses while doubling down on Zionism he will somehow reach the 3rd rail 🙄

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, let's elect a Reagan republican dressed up as a democrat who will spend his whole term trying to reach across the aisle.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom torched his own political party and said Democrats have to speak to Republicans — and reject cancel culture — if they want to win.

Screw that. I enjoy watching Newsom bicker with Trump just like I enjoy when the Lincoln Project mocks Trump. But the next democratic candidate needs to be an actual progressive that supports workers and the disadvantaged in our nation.

[–] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (28 children)

I am very willing to debate this leading up to and during the primaries, but once those are done I am going to vote against the GOP no matter who is on the ballot.

[–] Laurentide@pawb.social 7 points 1 day ago

I am going to vote against fascism. If the Democratic party insists on choosing a candidate who agrees with Republican efforts to genocide me, then I am going to vote against their fascist too. And don't come looking for me to whine about it after; by the time the Niemoller poem gets to you I'll be long gone already.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 65 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My fear is that the politics-as-sport metaphor has become too literal. He's getting attention by hitting at Trump and more Democrats should be doing that, but his actual policies and stances are uninspiring and offensive. He's another pro-corporate, pro-wealth, pro-status-quo white guy whose best quality is he isn't Trump.

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Completely agree. I long for the day I can finally for FOR something rather than AGAINST something.

On the other hand, not-trump is a pretty damn good quality.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IdontplaytheTrombone@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There's no way he would win an election.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 47 points 1 day ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Great. He's gonna Hilary-up the election again.

[–] ChetManly@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Don't forget to pokey-mon-go to the polls.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

SEE! The ONLY way for Democrats to Win is to be as RIGHT WING as Possible!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (7 children)

After reading through the comments here, I’m no longer curious as to how we arrived at where we currently are. We’re an absolute mess! An embarrassingly arrogant and equally ignorant mess.

And while it’s true that our future remains uncertain, after reading through this thread, I’m not sure it’s a good idea that any of us hold on to any length of hope that this disaster will ever right itself again. That is, if it is to be believed that we are a microcosm of a larger collective.

It’s said, that hope is a luxury of those who have a choice. But we had a choice. And what did we do? We slept. We withheld votes in protest. We stayed home. We opted out. However it is presented- We made our choice.

And now here we are. Salivating at the chance to tear one another a new asshole while we marinade in the results of our inability to do the bare minimum to protect a nation’s democracy.

We didn’t just deserve this:

We earned it.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (22 children)

We had a choice between one monster, and another (there were other options, but both monsters fought to keep the non-monsters off the ballot). Sure, one monster was a bigger, meaner monster, but the other monster was still pretty damn evil. Maybe next time we should be allowed to pick someone that isn't evil, for a change.

It will never cease to amaze me that people blame the voters for being disgusted with the candidates, rather than blaming the parties for choosing such awful candidates.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Pretty sad to see all these bluemagas already prepared to lose and suck it up and vote for gruesome newsom. Why would the dems give you anything if you're prepared to do whatever they ask of you anyway??? Hey boss I would like a salary increase but dont worry if you cant I'm gonna work here forever no matter what...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Newsom is a corpo's idea of a progressive candidate. That is, he's not a progressive candidate.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Would I prefer a President Newsom to a President trump? Yes. Is Newsom trash that won’t actually change anything about how this country is broken or won’t change how corrupt the Democratic Party is, or won’t meaningfully improve Americans’ material conditions in a sustainable way? Yes.

People need to understand that what neoliberals like Newsom represent, is a perpetuation of everything that sucks about modern American governance. He might perform rhetorically in a satisfying way, some of the time, but he LITERALLY stands for NOTHING other than solidifying his own power and facilitating ’markets’. That’s it. While he is better at the speaking part of this job than some other Democratic Party leaders, understand that words are as deep as this dickhead gets. He and his corporate consultants will not actually improve anything, won’t meaningfully roll back fascism, won’t hold Republicans accountable, won’t reign in or regulate corporations, won’t give you healthcare, won’t stop the genocide, won’t fix media, won’t reform campaign funding, won’t build infrastructure, won’t prosecute business fraud, and on and on.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›