this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
572 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

74247 readers
4372 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

What's dumb about this statement is all Elon would have to do is market to all the places where broadband companies refuse to go and be affordable. tRump already killed the rural broadband initiatives. There's literally no competition and word-of-mouth could probably pull in more who are unhappy with their broadband provider.

However, capitalism and greed are cancers that know no limit...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago

Musk = POS Nazi.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 99 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Hmmm ditch lightning fast and stable fiber for the mediocre speed and unstable micro satellite internet connection controlled by a petty asshole...

What to do, what to do?

[–] d00ery@lemmy.world 19 points 13 hours ago

Just think how much control he can have if he owns the medium which people access the internet.

And he'd only do good things with that power /s

[–] baronofclubs@lemmy.world 45 points 15 hours ago

A society grows great when old men plant fiber whose speed they know they shall never download from.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 9 points 11 hours ago

Goat says garden needs more carrots.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Well I say starlink and f'elon can suck my ass.

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Lol, lmao even

[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 47 points 18 hours ago

Fiber fucking rules

[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 63 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Fibre is an investment that can be used and upgraded for decades. Starlink is a subscription service forever to a private company.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 26 points 18 hours ago (8 children)

And upgrading is piss cheap. Just change transceivers.

Same fiber cable that does 1gbps can do 100tbps.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 27 points 17 hours ago (10 children)

Honestly, I think starlink is a fantastic idea in general, but this is clearly bullshit. Starlink works well in tandem with fiber, not as a replacement.

It's just never going to be as cost effective as installed fiber. Fiber is obviously the right technology to use in heavily populated areas i.e. for the vast majority of Internet users. And where the population is sparse and laying fiber for individual customers is cost prohibitive, that is where satellite connectivity shines. If SpaceX or anyone else is pretending otherwise, they're being blatantly deceitful and malicious. That's not in Internet users' best interest.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

In France they authorised air hanging fiber, so they just use electric poles and hang the fiber under the 220 volt lines, as a last resort.

Cheap as hell. Or, where there's a will there is a way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Saleh@feddit.org 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

As fiber is rolled out more, i see less and less why it would be cost prohibitive?

All you need to do to connect a remote place is lay a cable. More expensive if you need dig a trench and put the cable in there. But if it can be done for electricity it can be done for fiber.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 15 hours ago

lets get down to the real reason he wants to do this. he would be able to turn off connection for millions if they piss him off, or hand over the data to said political actors like putin or trump, also to manipulate future elections like he did last time.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] _lilith@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago

That will work out as well as the death tunnel (formerly hyperlink)

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 183 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

all you can eat latency and an oversaturated network on devices with a limited lifespan.. what else could you ask for!

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 66 points 22 hours ago (38 children)

Starlink has much better latency than most satellites, but still 10 to 50 times as much as fiber.

load more comments (38 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 107 points 22 hours ago (14 children)

I’m a starlink customer and think it’s one of the best advancements in the past decade as it provides real access to rural addresses. The side effects of this is nearly immeasurable.

Spacex needs to STFU about this though. Fiber should continue to be deployed where possible.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 107 points 21 hours ago (8 children)

Fiber should be deployed to rural addresses like yours (and should've been a long time ago). Instead, that money was funneled to the likes of Time Warner and Comcast who never even followed through on their part of the deal. Now, SpaceX is getting funneled the cash.

I'm super thankful that WA State supports and gives assistance to counties building out public LUDs for fiber access, many paying attention to rural communities first. I escaped Comcast two years ago because of it.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 33 points 19 hours ago

Time Warner and Comcast need to have all that grant money clawed back. They contracted with the taxpayers to deliver a service and they didn't even make a good faith effort to start.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 24 points 18 hours ago

Alternative Headline: Billionaire Signals States Should Speed Fiber Rollout

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 29 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Yeah! I want my internet connection run by a man baby who turns off your access if he doesn't like you!

[–] Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Of course. In a month or two he can tell trump Dem statez are stupid and he should force them to do that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 71 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Basic physics says satellites using Ku-band or whatever they use can't compete with fibre.

Satellite internet has its uses like for ships at sea.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›